Currently, there are some useless includes in the codebase. We can use a tool named include-what-you-use to optimize these includes. By using a strict include-what-you-use policy, we can get lots of benefits from it.
1. Add metrics to `used permits` and `waitting permits` for compaction.
It would be useful to monitor `permits` hold by all executing compaction tasks and waitting compaction task.
2. Add log which can be chosen by config for merge rowsets.
It would be helpful to track the process of rowsets merging for compaction task which lasts for a long time.
Currently, there are M threads to do base compaction and N threads to do cumulative compaction for each disk.
Too many compaction tasks may run out of memory, so the max concurrency of running compaction tasks
is limited by semaphore.
If the running threads cost too much memory, we can't defense it. In addition, reducing concurrency to avoid OOM
will lead to some compaction tasks can't be executed in time and we may encounter more heavy compaction.
Therefore, concurrency limitation is not enough.
The strategy proposed in #3624 may be effective to solve the OOM.
A CompactionPermitLimiter is used for compaction limitation, and use single-producer/multi-consumer model.
Producer will try to generate compaction tasks and acquire `permits` for each task.
The compaction task which can hold `permits` will be executed in thread pool and each finished task will
release its `permits`.
`permits` should be applied for before a compaction task can execute. When the sum of `permits`
held by executing compaction tasks reaches a threshold, subsequent compaction task will be no longer allowed,
until some `permits` are released. Tablet compaction score is used as `permits` of compaction task here.
To some extent, memory consumption can be limited by setting appropriate `permits` threshold.
