Refactoring the filtering conditions in the current ExecNode from an expression tree to an array can simplify the process of adding runtime filters. It eliminates the need for complex merge operations and removes the requirement for the frontend to combine expressions into a single entity.
By representing the filtering conditions as an array, each condition can be treated individually, making it easier to add runtime filters without the need for complex merging logic. The array can store the individual conditions, and the runtime filter logic can iterate through the array to apply the filters as needed.
This refactoring simplifies the codebase, improves readability, and reduces the complexity associated with handling filtering conditions and adding runtime filters. It separates the conditions into discrete entities, enabling more straightforward manipulation and management within the execution node.
Currently, there are some useless includes in the codebase. We can use a tool named include-what-you-use to optimize these includes. By using a strict include-what-you-use policy, we can get lots of benefits from it.
# Proposed changes
Issue Number: close#6238
Co-authored-by: HappenLee <happenlee@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: stdpain <34912776+stdpain@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zhengguo Yang <yangzhgg@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wangbo <506340561@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: emmymiao87 <522274284@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Pxl <952130278@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: zhangstar333 <87313068+zhangstar333@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: thinker <zchw100@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Zeno Yang <1521564989@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Wang Shuo <wangshuo128@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: zhoubintao <35688959+zbtzbtzbt@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Gabriel <gabrielleebuaa@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: xinghuayu007 <1450306854@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: weizuo93 <weizuo@apache.org>
Co-authored-by: yiguolei <guoleiyi@tencent.com>
Co-authored-by: anneji-dev <85534151+anneji-dev@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: awakeljw <993007281@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: taberylyang <95272637+taberylyang@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Cui Kaifeng <48012748+azurenake@users.noreply.github.com>
## Problem Summary:
### 1. Some code from clickhouse
**ClickHouse is an excellent implementation of the vectorized execution engine database,
so here we have referenced and learned a lot from its excellent implementation in terms of
data structure and function implementation.
We are based on ClickHouse v19.16.2.2 and would like to thank the ClickHouse community and developers.**
The following comment has been added to the code from Clickhouse, eg:
// This file is copied from
// https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/blob/master/src/Interpreters/AggregationCommon.h
// and modified by Doris
### 2. Support exec node and query:
* vaggregation_node
* vanalytic_eval_node
* vassert_num_rows_node
* vblocking_join_node
* vcross_join_node
* vempty_set_node
* ves_http_scan_node
* vexcept_node
* vexchange_node
* vintersect_node
* vmysql_scan_node
* vodbc_scan_node
* volap_scan_node
* vrepeat_node
* vschema_scan_node
* vselect_node
* vset_operation_node
* vsort_node
* vunion_node
* vhash_join_node
You can run exec engine of SSB/TPCH and 70% TPCDS stand query test set.
### 3. Data Model
Vec Exec Engine Support **Dup/Agg/Unq** table, Support Block Reader Vectorized.
Segment Vec is working in process.
### 4. How to use
1. Set the environment variable `set enable_vectorized_engine = true; `(required)
2. Set the environment variable `set batch_size = 4096; ` (recommended)
### 5. Some diff from origin exec engine
https://github.com/doris-vectorized/doris-vectorized/issues/294
## Checklist(Required)
1. Does it affect the original behavior: (No)
2. Has unit tests been added: (Yes)
3. Has document been added or modified: (No)
4. Does it need to update dependencies: (No)
5. Are there any changes that cannot be rolled back: (Yes)
