### What problem does this PR solve?
If a query is canceled before fragment contexts are prepared, no
fragment context will be found. So we should set execution ready to
ensure tasks will not be blocked.
…ke select core (#48625)
fix invalid jsonb value write into segment file which make select core,
so we add a check for jsonb value when convert_to_olap which value will
be written into segment file
### What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #xxx
Related PR: Pick #48554
Problem Summary:
### Release note
None
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [x] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [x] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [x] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
This reverts commit #48207 for branch2.1 and #47841 for master
### What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #xxx
Related PR: #xxx
Problem Summary:
### Release note
None
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [ ] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
### What problem does this PR solve?
Related PR: #45041
Problem Summary:
If we set hudi_jni_scanner to an incorrect value, jni_connector will be
null, causing a core dump.
So we set Spark Hudi JNI scanner as default and the hadoop hudi jni
reader will be supported in future
### What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #xxx
Related PR: #xxx
Problem Summary:
They are only useful when there's a query hanging in BE. When it occurs,
we can dynamically change the vlog level.
### Release note
Reduce query-side INFO log quantity
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [ ] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [x] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [x] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [x] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [x] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
### What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close#41460
Problem Summary:
When reading the Iceberg table, previously read `DeleteRows` should not
be released immediately, as the Iceberg data file is split into multiple
`IcebergSplit`s for execution. These `IcebergSplit`s belong to the same
data file, meaning they share the same `DeleteRows`. Therefore,
`DeleteRows` in the `DeleteFile` should not be released prematurely.
Instead, they should be released when the shared_kv is reset, at which
point all `DeleteRows` will be freed along with the cached `DeleteFile`.
### Release note
None
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [ ] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
### What problem does this PR solve?
sql
```
SELECT *, ROW_NUMBER() OVER ( PARTITION BY orderid ORDER BY v DESC ) AS row_idfirst FROM test_v_legacy order by orderid;
```
core:
```
F20250225 11:23:08.735848 1788347 column_object.h:439] should not call the method in column object
*** Check failure stack trace: ***
F20250225 11:23:08.736686 1788345 column_object.h:439] should not call the method in column object
*** Check failure stack trace: ***
@ 0x5555fa0821b6 google::LogMessage::SendToLog()
@ 0x5555fa0821b6 google::LogMessage::SendToLog()
@ 0x5555fa07ec00 google::LogMessage::Flush()
@ 0x5555fa07ec00 google::LogMessage::Flush()
@ 0x5555fa0829f9 google::LogMessageFatal::~LogMessageFatal()
@ 0x5555fa0829f9 google::LogMessageFatal::~LogMessageFatal()
@ 0x5555dd722b1c doris::vectorized::ColumnObject::get_permutation()
@ 0x5555dd722b1c doris::vectorized::ColumnObject::get_permutation()
@ 0x5555dd6b933c doris::vectorized::ColumnNullable::get_permutation()
@ 0x5555dd6b933c doris::vectorized::ColumnNullable::get_permutation()
@ 0x5555dde3997f doris::vectorized::sort_block()
@ 0x5555dde3997f doris::vectorized::sort_block()
@ 0x5555e2f13646 doris::vectorized::Sorter::partial_sort()
@ 0x5555e2f13646 doris::vectorized::Sorter::partial_sort()
@ 0x5555e2f1503b doris::vectorized::FullSorter::_do_sort()
@ 0x5555e2f1503b doris::vectorized::FullSorter::_do_sort()
@ 0x5555e2f15a2f doris::vectorized::FullSorter::prepare_for_read()
@ 0x5555e2f15a2f doris::vectorized::FullSorter::prepare_for_read()
@ 0x5555f97fb76a doris::pipeline::SortSinkOperatorX::sink()
@ 0x5555f97fb76a doris::pipeline::SortSinkOperatorX::sink()
@ 0x5555fa018798 doris::pipeline::PipelineXTask::execute()
@ 0x5555fa018798 doris::pipeline::PipelineXTask::execute()
@ 0x5555fa04efe5 doris::pipeline::TaskScheduler::_do_work()
@ 0x5555fa04efe5 doris::pipeline::TaskScheduler::_do_work()
@ 0x5555fa052f2b doris::pipeline::TaskScheduler::start()::$_0::operator()()
@ 0x5555fa052f2b doris::pipeline::TaskScheduler::start()::$_0::operator()()
```
Issue Number: close #xxx
Related PR: #xxx
Problem Summary:
### Release note
None
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [x] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
### What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #xxx
Related PR: #xxx
Problem Summary:
### Release note
None
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [ ] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
