DEV: Have contract take a block in services

Currently in services, the `contract` step is only used to define where
the contract will be called in the execution flow. Then, a `Contract`
class has to be defined with validations in it.

This patch allows the `contract` step to take a block containing
validations, attributes, etc. directly. No need to then open a
`Contract` class later in the service.

It also has a nice side effect, as it’s now easy to define multiples
contracts inside the same service. Before, we had the `class_name:`
option, but it wasn’t really useful as you had to redefine a complete
new contract class.
Now, when using a name for the contract other than `default`, a new
contract will be created automatically using the provided name.

Example:
```ruby
contract(:user) do
  attribute :user_id, :integer

  validates :user_id, presence: true
end
```
This will create a `UserContract` class and use it, also putting the
resulting contract in `context[:user_contract]`.
This commit is contained in:
Loïc Guitaut
2024-10-01 17:17:14 +02:00
committed by Loïc Guitaut
parent 76ad581f67
commit fc1c5f6a8d
45 changed files with 369 additions and 498 deletions

View File

@ -38,18 +38,17 @@ RSpec.describe Service::Runner do
class FailedContractService
include Service::Base
class Contract
contract do
attribute :test
validates :test, presence: true
end
contract
end
class SuccessContractService
include Service::Base
contract
contract {}
end
class FailureWithModelService