PR #26784 adds the scroll lock in the modal which renders this second scroll lock for SK component redundant. Having it there in fact causes issues on iPads, where it isn't necessary.
Background
When creating webhooks on a site without the Discourse Category Experts plugin installed, the category_experts_unapproved_event and category_experts_approved_event webhook events are getting automatically added to webhooks without a way to disable them.
The category_experts_unapproved_event and category_experts_approved_event webhook events are associated with the Discourse Category Experts plugin so I am moving these webhook events into the Category Experts plugin.
Changes
This PR deletes Category Experts plugin specific webhook event types added into core.
This endpoint used to be a GET request, but was changed to POST to allow
larger payloads.
Follow up to commit ebc1763aa5c5224b42ef79680a5d1839ebbd5a85.
The new style is called `categories_only_optimized` and it is designed
to show only the parent categories, without any subcategories. This
works best for communities with many categories (over a thousand).
* UX: Apply admin table classes for consistent mobile styling on custom flags
* UX: Apply admin table classes for consistent mobile styling on custom flags
* UX: Apply admin table classes for consistent mobile styling on backups
* UX: Apply admin table classes for consistent mobile styling on plugins list
* DEV: tweaks on admin table
* UX: Apply admin table classes for consistent mobile styling on chat plugin
* apply prettier
* apply lint
* DEV: removed commented out code
* DEV: removed unnecessary div element
* scroll to the element
* remove the workaround
* revert
* add an extra assertion
* add enabled check
* improve switching
* rm
---------
Co-authored-by: Jarek Radosz <jradosz@gmail.com>
When rendering the initial search options, we re-use the `AssistantItem` component.
`AssistantItem` requires that you pass in the required params to define what _type_ of component it will be - category, tag, tag intersection, user, etc. This flexibility is nice, as we can just loop through all `@results` and pass in params, without having to predefine what _type_ of result it is.
It is is not very good when it comes to seperating the html strucutre of each unique _type_. This is an example of the initial search results:
<img width="408" alt="Screenshot 2024-10-23 at 9 04 18 AM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/46795697-6246-4b60-be18-fea200a57baa">
You can see that both categories **and** tags are being rendered. The HTML strcuture looks like so:
```html
<ul class="search-menu-assistant">
<li class="search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> CATEGORY </a>
</li>
<li class="search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> CATEGORY </a>
</li>
<li class="search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> TAG </a>
</li>
<li class="search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> TAG </a>
</li>
</ul>
```
There is no way to differentiate between the types, even though some are categories and others tags.
This PR adds a _typeClass_ to each component, that will be a additional class included at the top level of the component HTML structure.
```html
<ul class="search-menu-assistant">
<li class="category search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> CATEGORY </a>
</li>
<li class="category search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> CATEGORY </a>
</li>
<li class="tag search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> TAG </a>
</li>
<li class="tag search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> TAG </a>
</li>
</ul>
```
_See `.category` and `.tag` attached to each `search-menu-assistant-item`._
This will help us identify which _type_ it is, and allow devs to target and customize each element by _type_.
A followup to f05b984208e312ead39ce0ded560350d0b427ab2
* modifiers to keep track of components' lifecycles, instead of did-insert/did-update/willDestroy
* proper glimmer-friendly tracking in related models
* caching
* `@outletArgs`
* gjs
We were using a modifier purely for its lifecycle hooks - not to modify an element. This commit switches to using a helper, which provides a similar lifecycle, but without needing to be attached to an element.
Bug introduced in this PR https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/29244
When the experiment toggle button was introduced, new features did not look right when the toggle button was not available.
In addition, the plugin name can be an empty string. In that case, information about new features should be displayed.
…or a tip with the highest priority.
This regressed in 597ef1119536693ef0bc7fe799ff485047f9f6f7 where we got rid of `next()` calls, so we'd render the first tip we encounter.
The commit also adds a test and updates existing ones.
Moves the user-tip from the topic-timeline notifications button to the one at the bottom of the topic page.
Three reasons:
1. new users are more likely to use the button that has the full text (and description) rather than the icon-only one
2. we hide the timeline button when scrolled all the way to the bottom of the page, and then the tip doesn't seems to be attached to anything
3. we might be removing the timeline button altogether in the near future
The visitor stats on the /about page were previously showing as `NaN` immediately after enabling the `display_eu_visitor_stats` site setting because the stats for the /about page are cached and updated once every 30 minutes in a sidekiq job. The `NaN` would go away upon the next run of the relevant sidekiq job, but it's not good UX to display a cryptic `NaN` until the job runs. So, this commit ensures that the visitor stats is not displayed at all until the visitor stats is calculated and available.
Internal topic: t/128480.
Currently, when calling a service with its block form, a `#result`
method is automatically created on the caller object. Even if it never
clashed so far, this could happen.
This patch removes that method, and instead use a more classical way of
doing things: the result object is now provided as an argument to the
main block. This means if we need to access the result object in an
outcome block, it will be done like this from now on:
```ruby
MyService.call(params) do |result|
on_success do
# do something with the result object
do_something(result)
end
end
```
In the same vein, this patch introduces the ability to match keys from
the result object in the outcome blocks, like we already do with step
definitions in a service. For example:
```ruby
on_success do |model:, contract:|
do_something(model, contract)
end
```
Instead of
```ruby
on_success do
do_something(result.model, result.contract)
end
```
This PR is a follow-up to ea1473e532. When we initially added the experimental feature for automatically adding `[grid]` to images, we add the [grid] surrounding images after all the uploads have been completed.
This can lead to confusion when `[grid]` is delayed to be added in the composer, as users may try to add grid manually leading to breakage. This also leads to issues with Discourse AI's automatic image caption feature.
**In this PR**: we simply move the logic to be added when the images are uploaded and processing. This way, `[grid]` surrounding images is added immediately. We also apply a fix for an edge-case to prevent images from being wrapped in `[grid]` when they are already inside `[grid]` tags.
