This PR introduces FormKit, a component-based form library designed to simplify form creation and management. This library provides a single `Form` component, various field components, controls, validation mechanisms, and customization options. Additionally, it includes helpers to facilitate testing and writing specifications for forms.
1. **Form Component**:
- The main component that encapsulates form logic and structure.
- Yields various utilities like `Field`, `Submit`, `Alert`, etc.
**Example Usage**:
```gjs
import Form from "discourse/form";
<template>
<Form as |form|>
<form.Field
@name="username"
@title="Username"
@validation="required"
as |field|
>
<field.Input />
</form.Field>
<form.Field @name="age" @title="Age" as |field|>
<field.Input @type="number" />
</form.Field>
<form.Submit />
</Form>
</template>
```
2. **Validation**:
- Built-in validation rules such as `required`, `number`, `length`, and `url`.
- Custom validation callbacks for more complex validation logic.
**Example Usage**:
```javascript
validateUsername(name, value, data, { addError }) {
if (data.bar / 2 === value) {
addError(name, "That's not how maths work.");
}
}
```
```hbs
<form.Field @name="username" @validate={{this.validateUsername}} />
```
3. **Customization**:
- Plugin outlets for extending form functionality.
- Styling capabilities through propagated attributes.
- Custom controls with properties provided by `form` and `field`.
**Example Usage**:
```hbs
<Form class="my-form" as |form|>
<form.Field class="my-field" as |field|>
<MyCustomControl id={{field.id}} @onChange={{field.set}} />
</form.Field>
</Form>
```
4. **Helpers for Testing**:
- Test assertions for form and field validation.
**Example usage**:
```javascript
assert.form().hasErrors("the form shows errors");
assert.form().field("foo").hasValue("bar", "user has set the value");
```
- Helper for interacting with he form
**Example usage**:
```javascript
await formKit().field("foo").fillIn("bar");
```
5. **Page Object for System Specs**:
- Page objects for interacting with forms in system specs.
- Methods for submitting forms, checking alerts, and interacting with fields.
**Example Usage**:
```ruby
form = PageObjects::Components::FormKit.new(".my-form")
form.submit
expect(form).to have_an_alert("message")
```
**Field Interactions**:
```ruby
field = form.field("foo")
expect(field).to have_value("bar")
field.fill_in("bar")
```
6. **Collections handling**:
- A specific component to handle array of objects
**Example Usage**:
```gjs
<Form @data={{hash foo=(array (hash bar=1) (hash bar=2))}} as |form|>
<form.Collection @name="foo" as |collection|>
<collection.Field @name="bar" @title="Bar" as |field|>
<field.Input />
</collection.Field>
</form.Collection>
</Form>
```
The watch words controller creation function, create_or_update_word(), doesn’t validate the size of the replacement parameter, unlike the word parameter, when creating a replace watched word. So anyone with moderator privileges can create watched words with almost unlimited characters.
Handles the cases where the sections titles are Unicode only strings, allowing them to be expanded separately if the Unicode string contains letters.
Also prevents a sidebar section with the header hidden to be displayed collapsed.
Adds experimental_flags_admin_page_enabled_groups (default "")
to remove the Moderation Flags link from the admin sidebar for now,
there are still a few bugfixes that need to be done before we
are comfortable with turning this on more widely. This is
a _temporary_ flag, we will be removing this once the feature
is more stable.
If an existing user (John) accepts an invite created by Kenny to a group, John may be seen as invited by Kenny, despite already having an account on the site.
This fix removes the bug by excluding invites that determine the invited_by after the user's creation date. The delay buffer in the query accounts for invites that also create the user at the same time.
There's currently a race condition in the following spec:
65be7a7880/spec/system/admin_about_config_area_spec.rb (L70-L95)
where the form can be saved before the image uploader field has finished uploading the selected image and causing the assertion at line 94 to fail with the following error:
```
Failure/Error: expect(SiteSetting.about_banner_image.sha1).to eq(Upload.generate_digest(image_file))
NoMethodError:
undefined method `sha1' for nil
[Screenshot Image]: /__w/discourse/discourse/tmp/capybara/failures_r_spec_example_groups_admin_about_config_area_page_the_general_settings_card_can_saves_its_fields_to_their_corresponding_site_settings_312.png
~~~~~~~ JS LOGS ~~~~~~~
http://localhost:31338/assets/vendor.js 15902:14 "WARNING: uppy needs a unique id, pass one in to the component implementing this mixin"
~~~~~ END JS LOGS ~~~~~
./spec/system/admin_about_config_area_spec.rb:94:in `block (3 levels) in <main>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:552:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:552:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:513:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:503:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:460:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
./vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/webmock-3.23.1/lib/webmock/rspec.rb:39:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
```
This PR fixes the problem by making the system test wait for the image to finish uploading (with 10 seconds timeout) before carrying out the rest of the system test.
Before checking if flags were reordered on the topic page, we need to ensure that the reorder action was finished. To achieve it "saving" CSS is added and removed when AJAX call is completed.
Followup 2f2da7274732cba30d03b6c5c3a4194652cb6783
This commit moves topic view tracking from happening
every time a Topic is requested, which is susceptible
to inflating numbers of views from web crawlers, to
our request tracker middleware.
In this new location, topic views are only tracked when
the following headers are sent:
* HTTP_DISCOURSE_TRACK_VIEW - This is sent on every page navigation when
clicking around the ember app. We count these as browser page views
because we know it comes from the AJAX call in our app. The topic ID
is extracted from HTTP_DISCOURSE_TRACK_VIEW_TOPIC_ID
* HTTP_DISCOURSE_DEFERRED_TRACK_VIEW - Sent when MessageBus initializes
after first loading the page to count the initial page load view. The
topic ID is extracted from HTTP_DISCOURSE_DEFERRED_TRACK_VIEW.
This will bring topic views more in line with the change we
made to page views in the referenced commit and result in
more realistic topic view counts.
I am changing many of these to notes or resolving them as is,
most of these I have not actively worked on in years so someone
else can work on them when we get to these areas again.
This commit continues work laid out by ffec8163b0 for the admin config page for the /about page. The last commit set up the user interface, and this one sets up all the wiring needed to make the input fields and save buttons actually work.
Internal topic: t/128544.
While creating a new category if the user didn't specify a value for `minimum_required_tags` input but clicked it then it returned the "PG::NotNullViolation: null value in column 'minimum_required_tags'" error.
When visiting a user profile, and then opening the search, there's an option to filter down by posts made by that user.
When clicking that option, it used to pre-fill the "search bar" with "@<username>" to filter down the search.
This restore this behaviour and add a system spec to ensure it doesn't regress.
Context - https://meta.discourse.org/t/in-posts-by-search-option-does-not-work-when-clicked/312916
We want to allow admins to make new required fields apply to existing users. In order for this to work we need to have a way to make those users fill up the fields on their next page load. This is very similar to how adding a 2FA requirement post-fact works. Users will be redirected to a page where they can fill up the remaining required fields, and until they do that they won't be able to do anything else.
* Removed the link from the title, so the settings can only be accessed via the settings button on the right
* Added an icon to the "Learn more" link to indicate that it opens a new window
* Made various styling adjustments
Previously filter route was not setting topic list, this meant that
keyboard navigation using "G" "J" was not functioning.
This amends it by ensuring the list is set after looking up the model.
Many site settings can be distructive or have huge side-effects
for a site that the admin may not be aware of when changing it.
This commit introduces a `requires_confirmation` attribute that
can be added to any site setting. When it is true, a confirmation
dialog will open if that setting is changed in the admin UI,
optionally with a custom message that is defined in client.en.yml.
If the admin does not confirm, we reset the setting to its previous
clean value and do not save the new value.
* Load search results in displayed order so that when more categories are loaded on scroll, they appear at the end,
* Limit the number of subcategories that are shown per category and display 'show more' links,
When we turn on settings automatically for customers,
we sometimes use `.set_and_log` which will make a staff
action log for the site setting change. This is fine, but
there is no context for customers.
This change allows setting a message with `.set_and_log`, which
will be stored in the `details` column of the staff action log
created, which will show up on `/admin/logs/staff_action_logs`
---------
Co-authored-by: Kelv <kelv@discourse.org>
* FEATURE: Add Filter for Webhook Events by Status
* Fixing multiple issues
* Lint
* Fixing multiple issues
* Change the range of the status for webhook events
We want to get rid of the old topic bulk actions modal
and use the new dropdown (currently gated behind
experimental_topic_bulk_actions_enabled_groups). To do
this we need to use the new dropdown in all places in the
UI.
This commit changes the full page search UI to use the new
topic bulk actions dropdown if experimental_topic_bulk_actions_enabled_groups
is enabled, and makes some minor refactors to make this work.
Also add a spec for both the old and new functionality.
This commit fixes a problem where the user will not be able to reset
their password when they only have security keys and backup codes
configured.
This commit also makes the following changes/fixes:
1. Splits password reset system tests to
`spec/system/forgot_password_spec.rb` instead of missing the system
tests in `spec/system/login_spec.rb` which is mainly used to test
the login flow.
2. Fixes a UX issue where the `Use backup codes` or `Use authenticator
app` text is shown on the reset password form when the user does
not have either backup codes or an authenticator app configured.
The mistake was made when flags were moved to the database. The `notify_moderators` (something else) flag should be the last position on the list.
This commit contains 3 changes:
- update fixtures order;
- remove position and enable from fixtures (they can be overridden by admin and we don't want seed to restore them);
- migration to fix data if the order was not changed by admin.
This commit includes various UX improvements to the reset
password page:
* Introduce a `hide-application-header-buttons` helper to do the following:
* Hide Sign Up and Log In buttons, they are not necessary on this flow
* Hide the sidebar, it is a distraction on this flow
* Improve messaging when a 2FA confirmation is required first
* Improve display of server-side ActiveRecord model validation errors
in password form, e.g. instead of "is the same as your current password"
we do "The password is the same as your current password"
* Move password tip to next line below input and move caps lock hint
inline with Show/Hide password toggle
* Add system specs for 2FA flow on reset password page
* Fixes a computed property conflict issue on the password reset
page when toggling 2FA methods
Continued work on moderate flags UI.
In this PR admins are allowed to change the order of flags. The notify user flag is always on top but all other flags can be moved.
