This is to try fix this error by sending the keys
on the element itself:
```
Failure/Error: page.send_keys([PLATFORM_KEY_MODIFIER, "v"])
Selenium::WebDriver::Error::StaleElementReferenceError:
stale element reference: stale element not found in the current frame
(Session info: chrome=135.0.7049.84); For documentation on this error, please visit: https://www.selenium.dev/documentation/webdriver/troubleshooting/errors#stale-element-reference-exception
```
When a flagged chat message has already been deleted, we offer an option
in the review queue to agree with the flag and keep the message deleted.
However, this option is currently broken due to a missing implementation
for the option.
Internal topic: t/152203.
Adds a one-click chat reactions setting to the chat preferences page
where members can determine what one-click reactions are shown in chat.
- Frequent: This will be the default setting. (Automatically set based
on most used chat reactions)
- Custom: Members can choose up to three reactions they want to see in
their one-click chat/DM reactions menu. Defaults are `❤️`, `👍` ,
and `😄`.
This pull request is essentially the work of @dsims in
https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/31761
---------
Co-authored-by: dsims <1041068+dsims@users.noreply.github.com>
This introduces functionality to chat transcripts. If
you select _only_ a thread's OP and press the Copy button,
we will now copy the OP plus all of the thread's replies
into the transcript.
This is being done to make it easier to copy all the context
of a thread easily. The old way of selecting only some messages
inside a thread still works too.
This commit also unskips and refactors some transcript specs.
Fixing hashtag text glued to the icon, and updated some related properties to using better units.
---------
Co-authored-by: Martin Brennan <martin@discourse.org>
The system test relies on a MessageBus message being published and
received by the client. As we currently don't have a reliable way to
ensure that we run an assertion after the client has received all
MessageBus messages, we will just double the timeout for now.
This commit allows the ProseMirror rich editor to display chat
transcripts copied from chat using the "Copy" button.
The BBCode usually looks something like this:
```
[chat quote="hunter;29856;2025-03-20T07:13:04Z" channel="design gems 🎉" channelId="95"]
haha **ok** _cool_
[/chat]
```
But there are several variations that must be accounted for:
* Single message from single user
* Multiple messages from a single and multiple users
* Messages inside chat threads
The rich transcript extension has to ignore many of the chat transcript
markdown
tokens because they simply aren't necessary -- none of the ProseMirror
nodes need
to be editable. So, we basically recreate the same HTML that the chat
transcript markdown
rule does in the `toDOM()` function. Maybe in future we want to make the
markdown rule
do less and have this HTML creation in one place, but for now we need to
mirror in both files.
---------
Co-authored-by: Renato Atilio <renato@discourse.org>
We are not waiting for asynchronous operations to complete before
executing our assertions.
### Reviewer notes
Example test failure:
https://github.com/discourse/discourse/actions/runs/14100970402/job/39496976787
```
Failure/Error: measurement = Benchmark.measure { example.run }
expected `Chat::Channel.count` to have changed by 1, but was changed by 0
[Screenshot Image]: /__w/discourse/discourse/tmp/capybara/failures_r_spec_example_groups_chat_new_message_from_params_with_multiple_users_creates_a_dm_channel_when_none_exists_626.png
~~~~~~~ JS LOGS ~~~~~~~
~~~~~ END JS LOGS ~~~~~
./plugins/chat/spec/system/chat_new_message_spec.rb:57:in `block (3 levels) in <main>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:619:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/benchmark-0.4.0/lib/benchmark.rb:304:in `measure'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:619:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:580:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/timeout-0.4.3/lib/timeout.rb:185:in `block in timeout'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/timeout-0.4.3/lib/timeout.rb:192:in `timeout'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:570:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:527:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/webmock-3.25.1/lib/webmock/rspec.rb:39:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
```
A system test in `system/search_spec.rb` was failing with the following
error frequently on CI:
```
Failure/Error: expect(search_page).to have_heading_text("Search")
expected `#<PageObjects::Pages::Search:0x00007fb9fcd3f028>.has_heading_text?("Search")` to be truthy, got false
[Screenshot Image]: /__w/discourse/discourse/tmp/capybara/failures_r_spec_example_groups_search_when_using_full_page_search_on_mobile_works_and_clears_search_page_state_912.png
~~~~~~~ JS LOGS ~~~~~~~
(no logs)
~~~~~ END JS LOGS ~~~~~
./spec/system/search_spec.rb:42:in `block (3 levels) in <main>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:619:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/benchmark-0.4.0/lib/benchmark.rb:304:in `measure'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:619:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:580:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/timeout-0.4.3/lib/timeout.rb:185:in `block in timeout'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/timeout-0.4.3/lib/timeout.rb:192:in `timeout'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:570:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:527:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/webmock-3.25.1/lib/webmock/rspec.rb:39:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
```
The failure screenshot shows that the "user" is on the homepage even
though we have already clicked the search icon and ensured that the user
can see the search container. I suspect there is some sort of race
condition here since Capybara executes clicks in quick sucession where
we clicked on both the homepage logo and the search icon. It may be
possible that Ember redirected the user to the search page first
before the browser was able to finish navigating the user to the `/`
href.
### Reviewer notes
Test flaked in
https://github.com/discourse/discourse/actions/runs/14085443789/job/39448197089
with the following failure screenshot:
Currently, anonymous/shadow users go through the same permission checks
for chat as normal users do. This means that if a site has chat enabled
for all users, anonymous users also get access to chat. This may be
undesirable for some communities, so we're adding a new site setting
`allow_chat_in_anonymous_mode` to block access to chat for anonymous
users.
Internal topic: t/148088.
This change allows more flexibility when starting a 1-1 direct message
with another user. If there are no messages in the new DM channel then
we should still allow them to add additional users.
The test has been flaking in CI with the following message:
```
Failure/Error: measurement = Benchmark.measure { example.run }
expected: "draft"
got: ""
(compared using ==)
[Screenshot Image]: /__w/discourse/discourse/tmp/capybara/failures_r_spec_example_groups_chat_composer_draft_when_loading_a_channel_with_a_draft_loads_the_draft_458.png
~~~~~~~ JS LOGS ~~~~~~~
~~~~~ END JS LOGS ~~~~~
./plugins/chat/spec/system/chat_composer_draft_spec.rb:31:in `block (3 levels) in <main>'
```
When creating a DM to a group in chat, we show
a count of users for that group if the number of
users exceeds SiteSetting.chat_max_direct_message_users.
However, we were also counting bot users here, we should
only be counting human users, this led to confusion because
the chat group count was different from the one on
e.g. /g/:group_name
Prevents channel non-members from seeing the composer in threads. Since
they do not have the correct permissions to post within the channel, we
should show the join channel CTA in place of the chat composer.
This commit moves most of emoji logic into the discourse-emojis gem:
https://github.com/discourse/discourse-emojis/
Most notably:
- images are now symlinked from the gem
- the gem provides path to the json files
Search aliases have also been made asynchronous and memoized. When you
will search for an emoji we will now load the aliases and store the list
for future use.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Taylor <david@taylorhq.com>
In #31366, we added the ability for admins to remove people from group chats. However, that only works as long as the admin is already in the group chat.
For forum-side group messages, admins can join any of them at will. This PR extends that same ability to chat for parity.
This commit fixes an issue where if you tried to post
2 chat messages in quick succession which only contained
uploads (both `message` fields would be `""`), then we
would show the "You posted an identical message too recently."
error.
We should not do this for upload-only messages, they
are not identical messages.
Followup b5147a4634f0fd5c98262f949a8c766bfd73d290
When we aliased `leave` to `remove` and renamed
the method in `DirectMessageChannel` in the previous
commit, this inadvertantly caused an error when
unfollowing group channels in the channel list.
When clicking the X in the channel list, we hit
ChannelsCurrentUserMembershipFollowsController for the
current user and the channel, which is supposed to only
unfollow the channel for all channel types including DMs.
Group DMs have a different Leave behaviour vs Unfollow.
Leaving the channel altogether is done from the channel
settings page, the "Leave channel" button, and that
deletes the user's membership and DM user record from that
channel.
So, we were trying to do the leave channel behaviour in the
unfollow channel controller, which was returning the wrong
record for the serializer (a User not a Membership)
This fixes the issue and removes a bit of delegate/alias indirection
which was making the code a bit harder to fllow and search, even
though it was more succinct. Also adds missing specs that would
have caught this regression.
Updates the chat summary email to account for:
- unread mentions in category channels (same as before)
- unread direct messages (now excluding threads)
- unread watched thread replies (for both channels and DM channels)
We have also reduced the window from 1 week down to 1 day for all 3
criteria. The DM unreads query is now properly selecting the first
unread message within the window (rather than the first message
regardless of read status).
This change allows you to add a reaction to the most recent message, by sending a reaction message.
A reaction message can be formatted as `+{emoji}` (eg, `+❤️`), or as `+{emoji_code}` (eg, `+❤️`).
This feature allows admins to find what they are
looking for in the admin interface via a search modal.
This replaces the admin sidebar filter
as the focus of the Ctrl+/ command, but the sidebar
filter can also still be used. Perhaps at some point
we may remove it or change the shortcut.
The search modal presents the following data for filtering:
* A list of all admin pages, the same as the sidebar,
except also showing "third level" pages like
"Email > Skipped"
* All site settings
* Themes
* Components
* Reports
Admins can also filter which types of items are shown in the modal,
for example hiding Settings if they know they are looking for a Page.
In this PR, I also have the following fixes:
* Site setting filters now clear when moving between
filtered site setting pages, previously it was super
sticky from Ember
* Many translations were moved around, instead of being
in various namespaces for the sidebar links and the admin
page titles and descriptions, now everything is under
`admin.config` namespace, this makes it way easier to reuse
this text for pages, search, and sidebar, and if you change it
in one place then it is changed everywhere.
---------
Co-authored-by: Ella <ella.estigoy@gmail.com>
In the current admin index page, all plugins show up as tabs. This includes plugins with auto-generated config routes.
This changes the tabs to include only plugins with custom UIs.
This change adds a sidebar link for each plugin that fulfils the following criteria:
- Does not have an explicit admin route defined in the plugin.
- Has at least one site setting (not including enabled/disabled.)
That sidebar link leads to the automatically generated plugin show settings page.
due to an issue with LEFT JOIN, we were enqueue a "chat summary" email
for every new messages in a channel, instead of for every new mentions 😬
This bloated the sidekiq queue with a lot of unecessary jobs as seen in
- https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/347197
- https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/346542
Thankfully, it wasn't sending those emails as the query for listing the
unread mentions and dms was correct when generating the chat summary
email.
Due to a recent regression the selection management was failing in
drawer mode for threads. We were not correctly setting the active
thread.
This commit fixes the issue and adds a spec.
Previously the return to forum link would automatically take you to the
forum homepage, however this was not intended functionality. We should
attempt to take the user to their last viewed forum page.
This change fixes a bug in how we determined what the destination link
should be.
Internal ref: /t/110508
The following case was bugged:
- visit a thread in full page chat
- click channel title
- click back button in channel navbar
- 💥 you would have a channel with limited width as if there was
still the thread showing next to it, but it was empty
This commit does several changes:
- it moves the ownership of the last message info to the channel instead
of storing it on the message, it avoids the need to iterate over every
messages
- makes an optimistic update of the last read message id
- adds a spec to confirm this behavior
Users can now decide if they want to send a message on:
- <kbd>enter</kbd>
- <kbd>meta + enter</kbd>
If you choose <kbd>meta + enter</kbd>, <kbd>enter</kbd> will add a
linebreak.
<img width="192" alt="Screenshot 2025-01-21 at 12 57 48"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/abfd6f8b-83b3-4e6f-be67-8f63d536ca8a"
/>
```
Checking for expected text of nil is confusing and/or pointless
since it will always match. Please specify a string or regexp instead.
plugins/chat/spec/system/chat_message_interaction_spec.rb:51
```
Lazy loading images naturally causes a slight delay, because the browser
only starts to load them after laying out the DOM and checking whether
they're in the viewport. Plus, in Safari, re-rendering the DOM of a
lazy-loaded image always causes a brief flicker, even if the image is
already cached in the browser.
Lazy-loading is most beneficial on large one-off images which are often
rendered outside the viewport. That's frequently the case for images
which users share in topics. Avatars, on the other hand, are very small
images, they're very often above-the-fold, and the same avatar often
occurs many times on the same page.
Therefore, this commit removes `loading="lazy"` from avatars, which
should improve avatar load times in all browsers, and stop the flicker
in Safari.
---
Tapping logo to reload topic-list in Safari. Before: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/242299f8-aa13-4991-b321-2f143603ed26
After: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5e5bfd28-3a78-40fd-af21-3d92e7b3ba8a
Previously if you linked to a chat thread inline, our oneboxer
did not have special handling for this, so the link would end
up with the text "Chat #channel-name" which is not ideal for a
thread.
This commit makes it so the thread onebox is in the format
"Thread title - #channel-name" if the thread title exists,
otherwise we show "Thread in #channel-name"
When clicking the "new features" notification item for
admins that navigates to /whats-new, the user notification
menu was not closing. This was happening because inside
the UserMenu::Menu component, the `routeDidChange` event
was firing and calling `closeUserMenu()`, however this is already
called inside the `Header` component via `toggleHamburger()`.
This is _only_ happening for the "new features" notification
item, other items have already been destroyed and they do not get
the `routeDidChange` event. No idea why, but this fixes the issue
in a global way.
And change the "formula" to check for duplicate messages to
- no duplicate check in 1:1 DMs
- only duplicate check in group DMs / channels, for posts made by the
same user, in the past 10 seconds
Internal ref - t/144262
The chat emoji picker is renamed emoji-picker, and the old emoji-picker is removed.
This commit doesn't attempt to fully rework a new emoji-picker but instead tries to migrate everything to one picker (the chat one) and add small changes.
Other notable changes:
- all the favorite emojis code has been mixed into one service which is able to store one state per context, favorites emojis will be stored for all topics, and for each chat channel. Meaning that if you always use a specific emoji in a channel, it will only show as favorite emoji in this channel.
- a lot of static code has been removed which should improve initial load perf of discourse. Initially this code was around to improve the performance of the emoji picker rendering.
- the emojis are now stored, once the full list has been loaded, if you close and reopen the picker it won't have to load them again.
List of components:
- `<EmojiPicker />` will render a button which will open a dropdown
- `<EmojiPickerContent />` represents the content of the dropdown alone, it's useful when you want to render a picker from an action which is not the default picker button
- `<EmojiPickerDetached />` just a simple wrapper over `<EmojiPickerContent />` to make it easier to use it with `this.menu.show(...)`
---------
Co-authored-by: Renato Atilio <renatoat@gmail.com>
