We are not waiting for asynchronous operations to complete before
executing our assertions.
### Reviewer notes
Example test failure:
https://github.com/discourse/discourse/actions/runs/14100970402/job/39496976787
```
Failure/Error: measurement = Benchmark.measure { example.run }
expected `Chat::Channel.count` to have changed by 1, but was changed by 0
[Screenshot Image]: /__w/discourse/discourse/tmp/capybara/failures_r_spec_example_groups_chat_new_message_from_params_with_multiple_users_creates_a_dm_channel_when_none_exists_626.png
~~~~~~~ JS LOGS ~~~~~~~
~~~~~ END JS LOGS ~~~~~
./plugins/chat/spec/system/chat_new_message_spec.rb:57:in `block (3 levels) in <main>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:619:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/benchmark-0.4.0/lib/benchmark.rb:304:in `measure'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:619:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:580:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/timeout-0.4.3/lib/timeout.rb:185:in `block in timeout'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/timeout-0.4.3/lib/timeout.rb:192:in `timeout'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:570:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:527:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/webmock-3.25.1/lib/webmock/rspec.rb:39:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
```
A system test in `system/search_spec.rb` was failing with the following
error frequently on CI:
```
Failure/Error: expect(search_page).to have_heading_text("Search")
expected `#<PageObjects::Pages::Search:0x00007fb9fcd3f028>.has_heading_text?("Search")` to be truthy, got false
[Screenshot Image]: /__w/discourse/discourse/tmp/capybara/failures_r_spec_example_groups_search_when_using_full_page_search_on_mobile_works_and_clears_search_page_state_912.png
~~~~~~~ JS LOGS ~~~~~~~
(no logs)
~~~~~ END JS LOGS ~~~~~
./spec/system/search_spec.rb:42:in `block (3 levels) in <main>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:619:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/benchmark-0.4.0/lib/benchmark.rb:304:in `measure'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:619:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:580:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/timeout-0.4.3/lib/timeout.rb:185:in `block in timeout'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/timeout-0.4.3/lib/timeout.rb:192:in `timeout'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:570:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:527:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/webmock-3.25.1/lib/webmock/rspec.rb:39:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
```
The failure screenshot shows that the "user" is on the homepage even
though we have already clicked the search icon and ensured that the user
can see the search container. I suspect there is some sort of race
condition here since Capybara executes clicks in quick sucession where
we clicked on both the homepage logo and the search icon. It may be
possible that Ember redirected the user to the search page first
before the browser was able to finish navigating the user to the `/`
href.
### Reviewer notes
Test flaked in
https://github.com/discourse/discourse/actions/runs/14085443789/job/39448197089
with the following failure screenshot:
With header search we toggle the search icon when scrolling on topics,
which can feel visually jarring when the search icon is in the middle.
Switching the position of the chat icon in the header reduces the impact
of this.
Whenever you are about to reach the limit of users in a group DM, if you
send requests to add new users in parallel, they might all go through
ignoring the limit due to a race condition.
Internal - t/145895
We intend to replace this JQuery autocomplete implementation soon. But
before that, we'd like to drop the raw-hbs compilation/runtime system.
Therefore, this commit does a 1:1 conversion of the autocomplete
templates to vanilla JS. They're fairly small/simple, so they're still
fairly readable.
Currently, anonymous/shadow users go through the same permission checks
for chat as normal users do. This means that if a site has chat enabled
for all users, anonymous users also get access to chat. This may be
undesirable for some communities, so we're adding a new site setting
`allow_chat_in_anonymous_mode` to block access to chat for anonymous
users.
Internal topic: t/148088.
This change allows more flexibility when starting a 1-1 direct message
with another user. If there are no messages in the new DM channel then
we should still allow them to add additional users.
The test has been flaking in CI with the following message:
```
Failure/Error: measurement = Benchmark.measure { example.run }
expected: "draft"
got: ""
(compared using ==)
[Screenshot Image]: /__w/discourse/discourse/tmp/capybara/failures_r_spec_example_groups_chat_composer_draft_when_loading_a_channel_with_a_draft_loads_the_draft_458.png
~~~~~~~ JS LOGS ~~~~~~~
~~~~~ END JS LOGS ~~~~~
./plugins/chat/spec/system/chat_composer_draft_spec.rb:31:in `block (3 levels) in <main>'
```
When creating a DM to a group in chat, we show
a count of users for that group if the number of
users exceeds SiteSetting.chat_max_direct_message_users.
However, we were also counting bot users here, we should
only be counting human users, this led to confusion because
the chat group count was different from the one on
e.g. /g/:group_name
This was preventing favorites emojis to work correctly as it was using
topic context. No tests for now as it's a very specific behavior hard to
test with acceptance test and a system spec seems heavy for this.
This was causing some confusion and now that we have the chat preference
to send with enter or metakey+enter it's even more confusing.
If your setting is send on enter, you need to use shift+enter for a new
line, even in codeblocks. If your setting is meta+enter you need to use
enter in the codeblock for a new line, meta+enter will send as expected.
Prevents channel non-members from seeing the composer in threads. Since
they do not have the correct permissions to post within the channel, we
should show the join channel CTA in place of the chat composer.
We were using a zero width space added by CSS here, but have run into
occasional encoding issues for some reason? a couple people have
reported getting this instead of an empty space:
I can't repro the issue, but we can avoid it by removing this space in
CSS — setting the container height to `1em` along with `line-height:
normal` should make it consistent with the height of the text within.
In the blame it seems this static height on the container was added
after the pseudo hack, and achieves the same goal when I test it across
a Firefox/Chrome/Safari
This commit moves most of emoji logic into the discourse-emojis gem:
https://github.com/discourse/discourse-emojis/
Most notably:
- images are now symlinked from the gem
- the gem provides path to the json files
Search aliases have also been made asynchronous and memoized. When you
will search for an emoji we will now load the aliases and store the list
for future use.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Taylor <david@taylorhq.com>
In #31366, we added the ability for admins to remove people from group chats. However, that only works as long as the admin is already in the group chat.
For forum-side group messages, admins can join any of them at will. This PR extends that same ability to chat for parity.
This commit fixes an issue where if you tried to post
2 chat messages in quick succession which only contained
uploads (both `message` fields would be `""`), then we
would show the "You posted an identical message too recently."
error.
We should not do this for upload-only messages, they
are not identical messages.
Followup b5147a4634f0fd5c98262f949a8c766bfd73d290
When we aliased `leave` to `remove` and renamed
the method in `DirectMessageChannel` in the previous
commit, this inadvertantly caused an error when
unfollowing group channels in the channel list.
When clicking the X in the channel list, we hit
ChannelsCurrentUserMembershipFollowsController for the
current user and the channel, which is supposed to only
unfollow the channel for all channel types including DMs.
Group DMs have a different Leave behaviour vs Unfollow.
Leaving the channel altogether is done from the channel
settings page, the "Leave channel" button, and that
deletes the user's membership and DM user record from that
channel.
So, we were trying to do the leave channel behaviour in the
unfollow channel controller, which was returning the wrong
record for the serializer (a User not a Membership)
This fixes the issue and removes a bit of delegate/alias indirection
which was making the code a bit harder to fllow and search, even
though it was more succinct. Also adds missing specs that would
have caught this regression.
Updates the chat summary email to account for:
- unread mentions in category channels (same as before)
- unread direct messages (now excluding threads)
- unread watched thread replies (for both channels and DM channels)
We have also reduced the window from 1 week down to 1 day for all 3
criteria. The DM unreads query is now properly selecting the first
unread message within the window (rather than the first message
regardless of read status).
On chat setup we get the initial state of drafts for the current users,
we need to add them to the drafts manager, but we don't need to store
them again on the backend.
This commit adds a persist (boolean) parameter to the
`ChatDraftsManager.add` service which when set to true will only add the
draft on the frontend and not send it to the backend.
No test, as the behavior is already tested and unchanged, this is only a
performance improvement.
This change allows you to add a reaction to the most recent message, by sending a reaction message.
A reaction message can be formatted as `+{emoji}` (eg, `+❤️`), or as `+{emoji_code}` (eg, `+❤️`).
This feature allows admins to find what they are
looking for in the admin interface via a search modal.
This replaces the admin sidebar filter
as the focus of the Ctrl+/ command, but the sidebar
filter can also still be used. Perhaps at some point
we may remove it or change the shortcut.
The search modal presents the following data for filtering:
* A list of all admin pages, the same as the sidebar,
except also showing "third level" pages like
"Email > Skipped"
* All site settings
* Themes
* Components
* Reports
Admins can also filter which types of items are shown in the modal,
for example hiding Settings if they know they are looking for a Page.
In this PR, I also have the following fixes:
* Site setting filters now clear when moving between
filtered site setting pages, previously it was super
sticky from Ember
* Many translations were moved around, instead of being
in various namespaces for the sidebar links and the admin
page titles and descriptions, now everything is under
`admin.config` namespace, this makes it way easier to reuse
this text for pages, search, and sidebar, and if you change it
in one place then it is changed everywhere.
---------
Co-authored-by: Ella <ella.estigoy@gmail.com>
When making a double click on the [+] button next to the chat composer,
the upload dialog will now be displayed.
No test as it's hard to test with capybara and is not an important
behavior.
When a message is first sent, the original upload URL is used for a
split-second before it's replaced by the optimised thumbnail. Using
`didInsert` didn't re-run on any changes to the uploads. Switching to a
proper modifier, and checking the length of the uploads array within it,
will ensure that it is re-run whenever the uploads change.
A follow-up to #31343.
```
WARNING: Sass's behavior for declarations that appear after nested
rules will be changing to match the behavior specified by CSS in an upcoming
version. To keep the existing behavior, move the declaration above the nested
rule. To opt into the new behavior, wrap the declaration in `& {}`.
More info: https://sass-lang.com/d/mixed-decls
```
