- removes the option from site settings
- deletes the site setting on existing sites that have it
- marks posts using emojis as requiring a rebake
Note that the actual image files are not removed here, the plan is to
remove them in a few weeks/months (when presumably the rebaking of old
posts has been completed).
This switches to outputting a separate file for each theme component CSS
asset. We have separate CSS plugin files, separate JS files
(for plugins/themes/components), it makes sense to do the same for
component CSS assets.
Benefits:
- easier debugging
- fixes a regression with theme component sourcemaps
- changes to theme components are updated individually
With HTTP/2, there is also no performance downside to having additional
files in the initial request.
The API now accepts an array called "ids" to select specific items. This parameter is not present on the UI.
Example usage: "yoursite.com/review.json?ids[]=1&ids[]=2"
though other participants are not in allowed list)
If you create an allowlist of users who can PM you, and use the function
“Only specific users can send me private messages”, then you can’t be
added to group messages unless everyone in that message is already in
your allow list.
This commit allows user to be added to a group message even when other
participants are not in allowed list
This commit includes other various improvements to watched words.
auto_silence_first_post_regex site setting was removed because it overlapped
with 'require approval' watched words.
Fixes failures in user-preferences-interface-test on Ember CLI.
Included:
* DEV: User themes have `theme_id` not `id`
* FIX: `themeId` could point to a non-existent theme
* DEV: Add request stub
Co-authored-by: Penar Musaraj <pmusaraj@gmail.com>
This style is unnecessary because text inputs and textareas have
focus styles set elsewhere (lines 228 and 288 respectively) and we don't
have any `select` elements.
* A11Y: Improve the header menu "view all" title.
The title attribute has been used to attempt to provide the link with an accessible name, but the value of the title attribute is “view all” for the link in each of the tabs, and so their purpose is not uniquely identified.
Previously, the `{{mobile-nav}}` component required a `currentRouteName` property, passed from the router service. It would observe changes in this property, and update the UI accordingly.
If we change between routes which have the same `currentRouteName` (e.g. two different group message inboxes), then the `currentRouteName` does not change and does not trigger the observer. Currently in core, we are relying on the fact that currentRouteName temporarily enters a `.loading` substate during a transition. This will change when we remove the loading substate in the near future.
This commit refactors `{{mobile-nav}}` to inject the router directly, and use the `routeDidChange` event instead of an observer. The change is backwards compatible, but plugins passing the old `currentPath` property will be shown a deprecation notice.
On some modals the main/primary input field is a select-kit component (like `{{email-group-user-chooser}}` on the assign modal), so it makes sense to allow select-kit to steal focus on modals like these. This PR adds an `autofocus` option (default false) that allows select-kit to steal focus when it's rendered.
Default scopes are stored inside a class variable, which shouldn't be modified when a custom scope is added. If this happens, we're no longer to remove the scope when the plugin is disabled.
Included:
* DEV: Span can't contains divs
* DEV: Drop extra elements
* UX: Tweak `group` layout to fix button alignment
* UX: Add space between "Members" and "(N)"
Previously we were checking truthiness in some places, and `== true` in
others. That can lead to some inconsistent UX where the interface says
the email is valid, but account creation fails.
This commit ensures values are boolean when set, and raises an error for
other value types.
If this safety check is triggered, it means the specific auth provider
needs to be updated to pass booleans.
This `if` statement was backwards, such that it was a no-op. This hasn't
caused a problem because clicking an item triggers a page load, which
destroys and recreates the component.
However, we are soon planning to remove the intermediate loading screen,
which means the component will not be removed/recreated.
https://meta.discourse.org/t/177939/202
