If userA has multiple tab/devices on the same topic, and:
1. userA likes a post in tab1
2. userB likes the same post
3. userA post like `acted` attr would desync in tab2
This fix handles this case and also the reverse one when removing likes
interleaved with other users acting on the same post.
Reported in Meta at https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/227239/3
- Only validate if custom_fields are loaded, so that we don't trigger a db query
- Only validate public user fields, not all custom_fields
This commit also reverts the unrelated spec changes in ba148e08, which were required to work around these issues
cf273ec6 removed ie11 as a target. A side effect is that this also removed support for Safari 12, which we will be maintaining support for until January 2023
https://meta.discourse.org/t/224747
While editing a reviewable's tags, the tag chooser did not show the tags
restricted to a specific category. This happened because the tag-chooser
did not pass the categoryId to the server while it was requesting the
list of tags the user can use.
The cache was causing state to leak between tests since the `WatchedWord` record in the DB would have been rolled back but `WordWatcher` still had the word in the cache.
An SRV RR contains a priority value for each of the SRV targets that
are present, ranging from 0 - 65535. When caching SRV records we may want to
filter out any targets above or below a particular threshold.
This change adds support for specifying a lower and/or upper bound on
target priorities for any SRV RRs. Any targets returned when resolving
the SRV RR whose priority does not fall between the lower and upper
thresholds are ignored.
For example: Let's say we are running two Redis servers, a primary and
cold server as a backup (but not a replica). Both servers would pass health
checks, but clearly the primary should be preferred over the backup
server. In this case, we could configure our SRV RR with the primary
target as priority 1 and backup target as priority 10. The
`DISCOURSE_REDIS_HOST_SRV_LE` could then be set to 1 and the target with
priority 10 would be ignored.
See /t/66045.
The logic in 06893380 only works for `.js` files. It breaks down for `.br.js` and `.gz.js` files. This commit makes things more robust by extracting only the base_url from the service-worker JS, and taking the map filename from the original `sourceMappingURL` comment.
7a284164 previously switched the UserDestroyer to use find_each when iterating over UserHistory records. Unfortunately, since this logic is wrapped in a transaction, this didn't actually solve the memory usage problem. ActiveRecord maintains references to all modified models within a transaction.
This commit updates the logic to use a single SQL query, rather than updating models one-by-one
This reverts commit e599b5b08f4323d50fb2dd584dbb06333d60b995.
This didn't solve the problem we were trying to fix - reverting back to the standard migration pattern
This migration is failing to acquire a lock under some production conditions. We're only performing one action, so removing the transaction is safe and may help to resolve the issue.
22a7905f restructured how we load Ember CLI assets in production. Unfortunately, it also broke sourcemaps for those assets. This commit fixes that regression via a couple of changes:
- It adds the necessary `.map` paths to `config.assets.precompile`
- It swaps Sprockets' default `SourcemappingUrlProcessor` with an extended version which maintains relative URLs of maps
`script_asset_path('.../blah.js.map')` was appending `.js`, which would result in a filename like `.js.map.js`. It would also lose the `/assets` prefix, since the map files are not included in the sprockets manifest.
This commit updates the sourceMappingURL rewriting logic to calculate the service-worker's own JS url, and then append `.map`.
