The default behavior for Rails is to vary the response of an endpoint based on the `Accept:` header, and therefore it returns a `Vary:` header on responses. This instructs browsers and intermediate proxies to key their caches based on the value of the request's `Accept` header. In some cases (e.g. Akamai), the presence of a `Vary` header is enough to prevent caching entirely.
This commit restructures the Rails route definitions so that:
1. The "format" segment of the route is 'required'
2. The "format" segment of the route is constrained to a single value (e.g. `js` or `css`)
Now that the routes are guaranteed to have a `:format` segment, Rails will always prioritize that over the `Accept` header, and will therefore omit the `Vary` header.
Request specs are also added to test this behaviour for both stylesheets and theme-javascripts.
That was a weird UX (why hide the preferences navigation?) and a deprecated implementation (manually rendering a template into a named outlet)
This PR replaces it with an inline component.
When finding the candidates for `Topic.similar_to`, we will now ignore
topics in categories where `Category#search_priority` has been set to
ignore and also topics in categories which the user has specifically
muted.
Internal Ref: /t/87132
The repro for the bug:
Add a post with a mention of a user
Post another post below
Delete the first post with a mention
Reload the page and try to attempt to view hidden reply
- Only display topic actions (reply / notification bell) under correct circumstances (multiple posts present, etc)
- Moves topic actions from `glimmer-topic-timeline` into `glimmer-topic-timeline/container` where it should be
* FEATURE: Enforce mention limits for chat messages
The first part of these changes adds a new setting called `max_mentions_per_chat_message`, which skips notifications when the message contains too many mentions. It also respects the `max_users_notified_per_group_mention` setting
and skips notifications if expanding a group mention would exceed it.
We also include a new component to display JIT warning for these limits to the user while composing a message.
* Simplify ignoring/muting filter in chat_notifier
* Post-send warnings for unsent warnings
* Improve pluralization
* Address review feedback
* Fix test
* Address second feedback round
* Third round of feedback
Co-authored-by: Joffrey JAFFEUX <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
Note that we don't have a database table and a model for post mentions yet, and I decided to implement it without adding one to avoid heavy data migrations. Still, we may want to add such a model later, that would be convenient, we have such a model for mentions in chat.
Note that status appears on all mentions on all posts in a topic except of the case when you just posted a new post, and it appeared on the bottom of the topic. On such posts, status won't be shown immediately for now (you'll need to reload the page to see the status). I'll take care of it in one of the following PRs.
When a screened IP address is matched because it is either blocked or
allowed it should update match_count. This did not work because it
tried to validate the IP address and it failed as it matched with
itself.
Follow-up to 6357a3ce337bdf59c7a6a0f362897a46ffbd6304
where we allowed a general API key scope for user status
GET/PUT/DELETE, this commit allows the same for the
UserApiKey system.
This commit adds the messages_count column for ChatChannel messages,
which is the number of not-deleted messages in the channel.
This is not updated every time a message is created or deleted in a
channel, so it should not be displayed in the UI.
It is updated eventually via Jobs::ChatPeriodicalUpdates, which
will have additional functions in future after being introduced
here.
Also update these counts for existing channels in a post migration.
Previously we would trigger the event before the `Topic#deleted_at`
column has been updated making it hard for plugins to correctly work
with the model when its new state has not been persisted in the
database.
* FIX: Only modify secured sidebar links on user promotion/demotion
If a user is created populate their sidebar with the default
categories/tags that they have access to.
If a user is promoted to admin populate any new categories/tags that
they now have access to.
If an admin is demoted remove any categories/tags that they no longer
have access to.
This will only apply for "secured" categories. For example if these are
the default sitebar categories:
- general
- site feedback
- staff
and a user only has these sidebar categories:
- general
when they are promoted to admin they will only receive the "staff"
category. As this is a default category they didn't previously have
access to.
* Add spec, remove tag logic on update
Change it so that if a user becomes unstaged it used the "add" method
instead of the "update" method because it is essentially following the
on_create path.
On admin promotion/demotion remove the logic for updating sidebar tags because
we don't currently have the tag equivalent like we do for User.secure_categories.
Added the test case for when a user is promoted to admin it should
receive *only* the new sidebar categories they didn't previously have
access to. Same for admin demotion.
* Add spec for suppress_secured_categories_from_admin site setting
* Update tags as well on admin promotion/demotion
* only update tags when they are enabled
* Use new SidebarSectionLinkUpdater
We now have a SidebarSectionLinkUpdater
that was introduced in: fb2507c6ce80a1f4fc3a68a23342e5eca765a13f
* remove empty line
* FEATURE: Show warning if group cannot be mentioned
A similar warning is displayed when the user cannot be mentioned because
they have not been invited to the topic.
* FEATURE: Resolve mentions for new topic
This commit improves several improvements and refactors
/u/is_local_username route to a better /composer/mentions route that
can handle new topics too.
* FEATURE: Show warning if only some are notified
Sometimes users are still notified even if the group that was mentioned
was not invited to the message. This happens because its members were
invited directly or are members of other groups that were invited.
* DEV: Refactor _warnCannotSeeMention
User options were serialized at the root level of CurrentUserSerializer,
but UserSerializer has a user_option field. This inconsistency caused
issues in the past because user_option fields had to be duplicated on
the frontend.
The settings tab of each category channel should now present the option to allow or disallow channel wide mentions: @here and @all.
When disallowed, using these mentions in the channel should have no effect.
The `Set-Cookie` header is an exceptional case where multiple values are allowed, and should not be joined into a single header. Because of its browser-focussed origins (where set-cookie is not visible), `fetch()` does not have a clean API for this. Instead we have to access the `raw()` data.
This fixes various authentication-related issues when developing via the Ember CLI proxy.
By default, the topic map in the OP shows only if there are replies.
Some themes may want to show it at all times, and to do so, they can
use the API via `api.includePostAttributes('topicMap');`.
But this was including the topic map in every post. This change ensures
that attribute is only set for the first post (and it only affects that
API endpoint).
When narrow screen is enable and hamburgerVisible is set to true, transition to wide screen is breaking user-menu button.
We need to reset hamburgerVisible and domClean is a great way to achieve it.
1. Originally the feature did "Scroll to new posts when user is near bottom of PM" (74e188992483e8d55376a98b33a440c022c098de)
2. Then that feature was limited to "Only scroll to posts that are not your own in PMs." (4a2656192733ca84de8a702cbaf2c36651bf2368)
3. It was limited further to "Only scroll PMs on new message" (eaf7746ec9c73ea41cbf94775a9a6f842076cad7)
4. And later to "only scroll to bottom for discobot" (267d129f38d6d45d0863014bf93ad1bf932c70b3)
5. And the code was relegated to new-user-narrative plugin (48b7696dbc96e2d49a1d7ee84b68c1754bfaa0ea)
I don't think it's worth it to keep this scrolling code just for this very small specific case.
This did potentially confict with other post scrolling code, and also using `modifyClass` is something we'd like to avoid.
