Plugins like for example AI or Akismet create reviewable items. When the
plugin is disabled, then we cannot properly handle those items.
In that situation, we should display warnings about unhandled types.
Instruct admin to reenable plugins. In addition, we should allow the
admin to delete all pending reviews from disabled plugins.
Add flag reason filter and improve handling of deleted content in review queue
This commit enhances the review queue with several key improvements:
1. Adds a new "Reason" filter to allow filtering flags by their score type
2. Improves UI for deleted content by:
- Adding visual indication for deleted posts (red background)
- Properly handling deleted content visibility for staff (category mods can not see deleted content)
3. Refactors reviewable score type handling for better code organization
4. Adds tests for trashed topics/posts visibility
This change will help moderators more efficiently manage the review queue by
being able to focus on specific types of flags and better identify deleted
content.
Followup c7e471d35a0d394899eda5af26de64511e199cc6
It is currently possible to add a bundle (which is a collection
of actions used for a dropdown on the client) for a reviewable
via actions.add_bundle and then never add any actions to it.
This causes the client to explode, as seen in the referenced
commit, because of the way our store expects to resolve objects
referenced by ID that are passed down by the serializer, which
then causes Ember to have an unrecoverable render error.
Fixing this on the serializer level is not really possible because
of all the ActiveModel::Serializer magic that serializes
objects by ID reference when doing things like has_many.
`Reviewable#actions_for` is a better place to do this anyway,
because this is the main location where the bundles and actions
are built for every action via the serializer.
We already add the "delete user" and "delete and block user" options to the drop-down for potential spam, but we should do this for potentially illegal posts as well.
This is entirely based on the implementation for the potential spam one, including caching the status on the reviewable record.
Also note that just as for potential spam, the user must be "deletable" for the option to appear.
I also took the liberty to move the options in the drop-down to what I think is a more intuitive place. (Between delete post and suspend/silence user.)
Currently, categories support designating only 1 group as a moderation group on the category. This commit removes the one group limitation and makes it possible to designate multiple groups as mods on a category.
Internal topic: t/124648.
Currently, when a plugin registers a new reviewable type or extends a
list method (through `register_reviewble_type` and `extend_list_method`
respectively), the new array is statically computed and always returns
the same value. It will continue to return the same value even if the
plugin is disabled (it can be a problem in a multisite env too).
To address this issue, this patch changes how `extend_list_method`
works. It’s now using `DiscoursePluginRegistry.define_filtered_register`
to create a register on the fly and store the extra values from various
plugins. It then combines the original values with the ones from the
registry. The registry is already aware of disabled plugins, so when a
plugin is disabled, its registered values won’t be returned.
* DEV: Upgrade Rails to 7.1
* FIX: Remove references to `Rails.logger.chained`
`Rails.logger.chained` was provided by Logster before Rails 7.1
introduced their broadcast logger. Now all the loggers are added to
`Rails.logger.broadcasts`.
Some code in our initializers was still using `chained` instead of
`broadcasts`.
* DEV: Make parameters optional to all FakeLogger methods
* FIX: Set `override_level` on Logster loggers (#27519)
A followup to f595d599dd361b7fb39fb3c82cbc11d19d518c19
* FIX: Don’t duplicate Rack response
---------
Co-authored-by: Jarek Radosz <jradosz@gmail.com>
* DEV: Upgrade Rails to 7.1
* FIX: Remove references to `Rails.logger.chained`
`Rails.logger.chained` was provided by Logster before Rails 7.1
introduced their broadcast logger. Now all the loggers are added to
`Rails.logger.broadcasts`.
Some code in our initializers was still using `chained` instead of
`broadcasts`.
* DEV: Make parameters optional to all FakeLogger methods
* FIX: Set `override_level` on Logster loggers (#27519)
A followup to f595d599dd361b7fb39fb3c82cbc11d19d518c19
* FIX: Don’t duplicate Rack response
---------
Co-authored-by: Jarek Radosz <jradosz@gmail.com>
* Revert "FIX: Set `override_level` on Logster loggers (#27519)"
This reverts commit c1b0488c547bca935de51cfbb86bbc528e9ab2e5.
* Revert "DEV: Make parameters optional to all FakeLogger methods"
This reverts commit 3318dad7b4e3365854319bb55301cf667a2c28d0.
* Revert "FIX: Remove references to `Rails.logger.chained`"
This reverts commit f595d599dd361b7fb39fb3c82cbc11d19d518c19.
* Revert "DEV: Upgrade Rails to 7.1"
This reverts commit 081b00391e47a7f9bc44b9fe8ce88ac97d728352.
Followup 783c935dcb7f114c206da4fe9c46c91ca5c687f3
Some admins were finding that the limit introduced above was
too short especially when sending an email to rejected users.
This commit bumps the limit from 500 to 2000 and also fixes
an issue where the friendly error message was not shown in
the browser.
c.f. https://meta.discourse.org/t/500-character-reject-reason-is-too-small-a-limit/291884
This commit adds a new Revise... action that can be taken
for queued post reviewables. This will open a modal where
the user can select a Reason from a preconfigured list
(or by choosing Other..., a custom reason) and provide feedback
to the user about their post.
The post will be rejected still, but a PM will also be sent to
the user so they have an opportunity to improve their post when
they resubmit it.
Follow-up to #23199 in which we moved the "delete user" options under the relevant action menu for flagged post. This change does the same, but to queued posts.
As per discussion, we want to move the options to delete the user under the "Yes" menu of the review queue, since these options are often the most recommended, but also frequently missed because they are tucked away under their own menu.
In addition to the move, I removed the title case of the options so that it matches the other options in the "Yes" menu.
`ReviewableQueuedPost` got refactored a while back to use the more
appropriate `target_created_by` for the user of the post being queued
instead of `created_by`. The change was not extended to the `DELETE
/review/:id` endpoint leading to error responses for a user attempting
to deleting their own queued post.
This fix extends the `Reviewable` lookup implementation in
`ReviewablesController#destroy` and Guardian implementation to account
for this change.
A previous change updated `ReviewableQueuedPost`'s `created_by`
to be consistent with other reviewable types. It assigns
the the creator of the post being queued to `target_created_by` and sets
the `created_by` to the creator of the reviewable itself.
This fix updates some of the `created_by` references missed during the
intial fix.
Performing a `Delete User`/`Delete and Block User` reviewable actions for a
queued post reviewable from the `review.show` route results in an error
popup even if the action completes successfully.
This happens because unlike other reviewable types, a user delete action
on a queued post reviewable results in the deletion of the reviewable
itself. A subsequent attempt to reload the reviewable record results in
404. The deletion happens as part of the call to `UserDestroyer` which
includes a step for destroying reviewables created by the user being
destroyed. At the root of this is the creator of the queued post
being set as the creator of the reviewable as instead of the system
user.
This change assigns the creator of the reviewable to the system user and
uses the more approapriate `target_created_by` column for the creator of the
post being queued.
The attribute Reviewable#post_options was deprecated (and replaced by #payload) four years ago, and marked for deletion in 2.9.0. This commit removes it.
Before this fix if the underlying model of a reviewable was changed, the filter wouldn't work anymore as it was expecting a 1:1 relation between filter type and model name.
This commit also relies on the `Reviewable.types` array to check against valid types instead of a regex not checking much.
Finally this commit adds a spec to ensure chat reviewables are listable from the review index page.
This commit main goal was to comply with Zeitwerk and properly rely on autoloading. To achieve this, most resources have been namespaced under the `Chat` module.
- Given all models are now namespaced with `Chat::` and would change the stored types in DB when using polymorphism or STI (single table inheritance), this commit uses various Rails methods to ensure proper class is loaded and the stored name in DB is unchanged, eg: `Chat::Message` model will be stored as `"ChatMessage"`, and `"ChatMessage"` will correctly load `Chat::Message` model.
- Jobs are now using constants only, eg: `Jobs::Chat::Foo` and should only be enqueued this way
Notes:
- This commit also used this opportunity to limit the number of registered css files in plugin.rb
- `discourse_dev` support has been removed within this commit and will be reintroduced later
<!-- NOTE: All pull requests should have tests (rspec in Ruby, qunit in JavaScript). If your code does not include test coverage, please include an explanation of why it was omitted. -->
Users who can access the review queue can claim a pending reviewable(s) which means that the claimed reviewable(s) can only be handled by the user who claimed it. Currently, we show claimed reviewables in the user menu, but this can be annoying for other reviewers because they can't do anything about a reviewable claimed by someone. So this PR makes sure that we only show in the user menu reviewables that are claimed by nobody or claimed by the current user.
Internal topic: t/77235.
This commit makes pending reviewables show up in the main tab (a.k.a. "all notifications" tab). Pending reviewables along with unread notifications are always shown first and they're sorted based on their creation date (most recent comes first).
The dismiss button currently only shows up if there are unread notifications and it doesn't dismiss pending reviewables. We may follow up with another change soon that allows makes the dismiss button work with reviewables and remove them from the list without taking any action on them.
Follow-up to 079450c9e4.
Currently, the reviewables tab in the user menu shows pending reviewables at the top of the menu and fills the remaining space in the menu with old/handled reviewables. This PR makes the revieables tab show only pending reviewables and hides the tab altogether from the menu if there are no pending reviewables. We're going to follow-up with another change soon that will show pending reviewables in the main tab of the user menu.
Internal topic: t/73220.
`pending`, `approved`, `rejected`, `ignored`, and `deleted` scope method were accessible on all model classes… 😂
Fixes `Creating scope :pending. Overwriting existing method DiscoursePostEvent::EventDate.pending.` warnings.
* FIX: Clear stale status of reloaded reviewables
Navigating away from and back to the reviewables reloaded Reviewable
records, but did not clear the "stale" attribute.
* FEATURE: Show user who last acted on reviewable
When a user acts on a reviewable, all other clients are notified and a
generic "reviewable was resolved by someone" notice was shown instead of
the buttons. There is no need to keep secret the username of the acting
user.
Subclasses must call #delete_user_actions inside build_actions to support user deletion. The method adds a delete user bundle, which has a delete and a delete + block option. Every subclass is responsible for implementing these actions.
The previous commits removed reviewables leading to a bad user
experience. This commit updates the status, replaces actions with a
message and greys out the reviewable.
Recalculating a ReviewableFlaggedPost's score after rejecting or ignoring it sets the score as 0, which means that we can't find them after reviewing. They don't surpass the minimum priority threshold and are hidden.
Additionally, we only want to use agreed flags when calculating the different priority thresholds.
Adds a webhook to notify when a reviewable score is updated.
This is different from created or status changed as additional flags can
roll in and update the score without updating status. Useful for applications
looking to integrate in with Discourse's scores
This filter hides reviewables with a score lower than the "reviewable_low_priority_threshold" setting. We only use reviewables that already met this threshold to calculate the Medium and High priority filters.
