This commit should cause no functional change
- Split into functions to avoid deep nesting
- Register custom field type, and remove manual json parse/serialize
- Recover from deleted upload records
Also adds a test to ensure pull_hotlinked_images redownloads secure images only once
The assign plugin is one of two situations where a post can be both a whisper and a small-action. Check the action_code field to filter out small-actions.
* Fixed an issue I introduced in the last PR where I am just archiving everything regardless of whether it is actually archived in Discourse man_facepalming
* Refactor group list_mailboxes IMAP code to use providers, add specs, and add provider code to get the correct prodivder
A first step to adding automatic dark mode color scheme switching. Adds a new SCSS file at `color_definitions.scss` that serves to output all SCSS color variables as CSS custom properties. And replaces all SCSS color variables with the new CSS custom properties throughout the stylesheets.
This is an alpha feature at this point, can only be enabled via console using the `default_dark_mode_color_scheme_id` site setting.
Adds a imap_group_id column to IncomingEmail to deal with an issue where we were trying to update emails in the mailbox, calling IncomingEmail.where(imap_sync: true). However UID and UIDVALIDITY could be the same across accounts. So if group A used IMAP details for Gmail account A, and group B used IMAP details for Gmail account B, and both tried to sync changes to an email with UID of 3 (e.g. changing Labels), one account could affect the other. This even applied to Archiving!
Also in this PR:
* Fix error occurring if we do a uid_fetch and no emails are returned
* Allow for creating labels within the target mailbox (previously we would not do this, only use existing labels)
* Improve consistency for log messages
* Add specs for generic IMAP provider (Gmail specs still to come)
* Add custom archiving support for Gmail
* Only use Message-ID for uniqueness of IncomingEmail if it was generated by us
* Various refactors and improvements
For the following conditions, the TopicUser.bookmarked column was not updated correctly:
* When a bookmark was auto-deleted because the reminder was sent
* When a bookmark was auto-deleted because the owner of the bookmark replied to the topic
This adds another migration to fix the out-of-sync column and also some refactors to BookmarkManager to allow for more of these delete cases. BookmarkManager is used instead of directly destroying the bookmark in PostCreator and BookmarkReminderNotificationHandler.
If a user posted a topic and Akismet decided it was spam, the topic gets deleted and put into the review queue. If a category moderator for that category marked the post/topic as "Not Spam" the topic did not get recovered correctly because Guardian.new(@user).can_review_topic?(@post.topic) returned false incorrectly because the topic was deleted.
This adds a special filter to topic lists that will filter to tracked and
watched categories.
To use it you can visit:
`https://sitename/?filter=tracked`
`https://sitename/unread?filter=tracked`
and so on
Note, we do not include explicitly tracked and watched topics **outside** of
the tracked categories and tags.
We can consider a `filter=all_tracked` to cover this edge case.
To reproduce the initial issue here:
1. A user makes a post, which discourse-akismet marks as spam (I cheated and called `DiscourseAkismet::PostsBouncer.new.send(:mark_as_spam, post)` for this)
2. The post lands in the review queue
3. The category the topic is in has a `reviewable_by_group_id`
4. A user in that group goes and looks at the Review queue, decides the post is not spam, and clicks Not Spam
5. Weird stuff happens because the `PostDestroyer#recover` method didn't handle this (the user who clicked Not Spam was not the owner of the post and was not a staff member, so the post didn't get un-destroyed and post counts didn't get updated)
Now users who belong to a group who can review a category now have the ability to recover/delete posts fully.
This adds an option to "delete on owner reply" to bookmarks. If you select this option in the modal, then reply to the topic the bookmark is in, the bookmark will be deleted on reply.
This PR also changes the checkboxes for these additional bookmark options to an Integer column in the DB with a combobox to select the option you want.
The use cases are:
* Sometimes I will bookmark the topics to read it later. In this case we definitely don’t need to keep the bookmark after I replied to it.
* Sometimes I will read the topic in mobile and I will prefer to reply in PC later. Or I may have to do some research before reply. So I will bookmark it for reply later.
* FEATURE: Allow List for PMs
This feature adds a new user setting that is disabled by default that
allows them to specify a list of users that are allowed to send them
private messages. This way they don't have to maintain a large list of
users they don't want to here from and instead just list the people they
know they do want. Staff will still always be able to send messages to
the user.
* Update PR based on feedback
In 1bd8a075, a hidden site setting was added that causes Email::Styles
to treat its input as a complete document in all cases.
This commit enables that setting by default.
Some tests were removed that were broken by this change. They tested the
behaviour of applying email styles to empty strings. They weren't useful
because:
* Sending empty email is not something we ever intend to do,
* They were testing incidental behaviour - there are lots of
valid ways to process the empty string,
* Their intent wasn't clear from their descriptions,
It seems there was a discrepancy in that background images were attached
to the full slug category class: `category-:slug-:id` and our body class
only had `category-:slug`.
This fix adds support for both formats.
Considering document length in search introduced too much variance in
our search results such that it makes certain searches better but at the
same time made certain searches worst. Instead, we want to have a more
determistic way of ranking search so that it is easier to reason about
why a post is rank higher in search than another.
The long term plan to tackle repeated terms is to restrict the number of
positions for a given lexeme in our search index.
Follow up to d8c796bc4.
Note that his change increases query time by around 40% in the following
benchmark against `dev.discourse.org` but this is a tradeoff that has to be taken so that relevance
search is accurate.
```
require 'benchmark/ips'
Benchmark.ips do |x|
x.config(time: 10, warmup: 2)
x.report("current aggregate search query") do
DB.exec <<~SQL
SELECT "posts"."id", "posts"."user_id", "posts"."topic_id", "posts"."post_number", "posts"."raw", "posts"."cooked", "posts"."created_at", "posts"."updated_at", "posts"."reply_to_post_number", "posts"."reply_count", "posts"."quote_count", "posts"."deleted_at", "posts"."off_topic_count", "posts"."like_count", "posts"."incoming_link_count", "posts"."bookmark_count", "posts"."score", "posts"."reads", "posts"."post_type", "posts"."sort_order", "posts"."last_editor_id", "posts"."hidden", "posts"."hidden_reason_id", "posts"."notify_moderators_count", "posts"."spam_count", "posts"."illegal_count", "posts"."inappropriate_count", "posts"."last_version_at", "posts"."user_deleted", "posts"."reply_to_user_id", "posts"."percent_rank", "posts"."notify_user_count", "posts"."like_score", "posts"."deleted_by_id", "posts"."edit_reason", "posts"."word_count", "posts"."version", "posts"."cook_method", "posts"."wiki", "posts"."baked_at", "posts"."baked_version", "posts"."hidden_at", "posts"."self_edits", "posts"."reply_quoted", "posts"."via_email", "posts"."raw_email", "posts"."public_version", "posts"."action_code", "posts"."locked_by_id", "posts"."image_upload_id" FROM "posts" JOIN (SELECT *, row_number() over() row_number FROM (SELECT topics.id, min(posts.post_number) post_number FROM "posts" INNER JOIN "post_search_data" ON "post_search_data"."post_id" = "posts"."id" INNER JOIN "topics" ON "topics"."id" = "posts"."topic_id" AND ("topics"."deleted_at" IS NULL) LEFT JOIN categories ON categories.id = topics.category_id WHERE ("posts"."deleted_at" IS NULL) AND "posts"."post_type" IN (1, 2, 3, 4) AND (topics.visible) AND (topics.archetype <> 'private_message') AND (post_search_data.search_data @@ TO_TSQUERY('english', '''postgres'':*ABCD')) AND (categories.id NOT IN (
SELECT categories.id WHERE categories.search_priority = 1
)
) AND ((categories.id IS NULL) OR (NOT categories.read_restricted)) GROUP BY topics.id ORDER BY MAX((
TS_RANK_CD(
post_search_data.search_data,
TO_TSQUERY('english', '''postgres'':*ABCD'),
1|32
) *
(
CASE categories.search_priority
WHEN 2
THEN 0.6
WHEN 3
THEN 0.8
WHEN 4
THEN 1.2
WHEN 5
THEN 1.4
ELSE
CASE WHEN topics.closed
THEN 0.9
ELSE 1
END
END
)
)
) DESC, topics.bumped_at DESC LIMIT 51 OFFSET 0) xxx) x ON x.id = posts.topic_id AND x.post_number = posts.post_number WHERE ("posts"."deleted_at" IS NULL) ORDER BY row_number;
SQL
end
x.report("current aggregate search query with proper ranking") do
DB.exec <<~SQL
SELECT "posts"."id", "posts"."user_id", "posts"."topic_id", "posts"."post_number", "posts"."raw", "posts"."cooked", "posts"."created_at", "posts"."updated_at", "posts"."reply_to_post_number", "posts"."reply_count", "posts"."quote_count", "posts"."deleted_at", "posts"."off_topic_count", "posts"."like_count", "posts"."incoming_link_count", "posts"."bookmark_count", "posts"."score", "posts"."reads", "posts"."post_type", "posts"."sort_order", "posts"."last_editor_id", "posts"."hidden", "posts"."hidden_reason_id", "posts"."notify_moderators_count", "posts"."spam_count", "posts"."illegal_count", "posts"."inappropriate_count", "posts"."last_version_at", "posts"."user_deleted", "posts"."reply_to_user_id", "posts"."percent_rank", "posts"."notify_user_count", "posts"."like_score", "posts"."deleted_by_id", "posts"."edit_reason", "posts"."word_count", "posts"."version", "posts"."cook_method", "posts"."wiki", "posts"."baked_at", "posts"."baked_version", "posts"."hidden_at", "posts"."self_edits", "posts"."reply_quoted", "posts"."via_email", "posts"."raw_email", "posts"."public_version", "posts"."action_code", "posts"."locked_by_id", "posts"."image_upload_id" FROM "posts" JOIN (SELECT *, row_number() over() row_number FROM (SELECT subquery.topic_id id, (ARRAY_AGG(subquery.post_number ORDER BY rank DESC, bumped_at DESC))[1] post_number, MAX(subquery.rank) rank, MAX(subquery.bumped_at) bumped_at FROM (SELECT "posts"."id", "posts"."user_id", "posts"."topic_id", "posts"."post_number", "posts"."raw", "posts"."cooked", "posts"."created_at", "posts"."updated_at", "posts"."reply_to_post_number", "posts"."reply_count", "posts"."quote_count", "posts"."deleted_at", "posts"."off_topic_count", "posts"."like_count", "posts"."incoming_link_count", "posts"."bookmark_count", "posts"."score", "posts"."reads", "posts"."post_type", "posts"."sort_order", "posts"."last_editor_id", "posts"."hidden", "posts"."hidden_reason_id", "posts"."notify_moderators_count", "posts"."spam_count", "posts"."illegal_count", "posts"."inappropriate_count", "posts"."last_version_at", "posts"."user_deleted", "posts"."reply_to_user_id", "posts"."percent_rank", "posts"."notify_user_count", "posts"."like_score", "posts"."deleted_by_id", "posts"."edit_reason", "posts"."word_count", "posts"."version", "posts"."cook_method", "posts"."wiki", "posts"."baked_at", "posts"."baked_version", "posts"."hidden_at", "posts"."self_edits", "posts"."reply_quoted", "posts"."via_email", "posts"."raw_email", "posts"."public_version", "posts"."action_code", "posts"."locked_by_id", "posts"."image_upload_id", (
TS_RANK_CD(
post_search_data.search_data,
TO_TSQUERY('english', '''postgres'':*ABCD'),
1|32
) *
(
CASE categories.search_priority
WHEN 2
THEN 0.6
WHEN 3
THEN 0.8
WHEN 4
THEN 1.2
WHEN 5
THEN 1.4
ELSE
CASE WHEN topics.closed
THEN 0.9
ELSE 1
END
END
)
)
rank, topics.bumped_at bumped_at FROM "posts" INNER JOIN "post_search_data" ON "post_search_data"."post_id" = "posts"."id" INNER JOIN "topics" ON "topics"."id" = "posts"."topic_id" AND ("topics"."deleted_at" IS NULL) LEFT JOIN categories ON categories.id = topics.category_id WHERE ("posts"."deleted_at" IS NULL) AND "posts"."post_type" IN (1, 2, 3, 4) AND (topics.visible) AND (topics.archetype <> 'private_message') AND (post_search_data.search_data @@ TO_TSQUERY('english', '''postgres'':*ABCD')) AND (categories.id NOT IN (
SELECT categories.id WHERE categories.search_priority = 1
)
) AND ((categories.id IS NULL) OR (NOT categories.read_restricted))) subquery GROUP BY subquery.topic_id ORDER BY rank DESC, bumped_at DESC LIMIT 51 OFFSET 0) xxx) x ON x.id = posts.topic_id AND x.post_number = posts.post_number WHERE ("posts"."deleted_at" IS NULL) ORDER BY row_number;
SQL
end
x.compare!
end
```
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
current aggregate search query
1.000 i/100ms
current aggregate search query with proper ranking
1.000 i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
current aggregate search query
18.040 (± 0.0%) i/s - 181.000 in 10.035241s
current aggregate search query with proper ranking
12.992 (± 0.0%) i/s - 130.000 in 10.007214s
Comparison:
current aggregate search query: 18.0 i/s
current aggregate search query with proper ranking: 13.0 i/s - 1.39x (± 0.00) slower
```
```
discourse_development=# SELECT alias, lexemes FROM TS_DEBUG('www.discourse.org');
alias | lexemes
-------+---------------------
host | {www.discourse.org}
discourse_development=# SELECT TO_TSVECTOR('www.discourse.org');
to_tsvector
-----------------------
'www.discourse.org':1
```
Given the above lexeme, we will inject additional lexeme by splitting
the host on `.`. The actual tsvector stored will look something like
```
tsvector
---------------------------------------
'discourse':1 'discourse.org':1 'org':1 'www':1 'www.discourse.org':1
```
Previously, we would only take either the `MIN` or `MAX` for
`post_number` during aggregation meaning that the ranking is not
considered.
```
require 'benchmark/ips'
Benchmark.ips do |x|
x.config(time: 10, warmup: 2)
x.report("current aggregate search query") do
DB.exec <<~SQL
SELECT "posts"."id", "posts"."user_id", "posts"."topic_id", "posts"."post_number", "posts"."raw", "posts"."cooked", "posts"."created_at", "posts"."updated_at", "posts"."reply_to_post_number", "posts"."reply_count", "posts"."quote_count", "posts"."deleted_at", "posts"."off_topic_count", "posts"."like_count", "posts"."incoming_link_count", "posts"."bookmark_count", "posts"."score", "posts"."reads", "posts"."post_type", "posts"."sort_order", "posts"."last_editor_id", "posts"."hidden", "posts"."hidden_reason_id", "posts"."notify_moderators_count", "posts"."spam_count", "posts"."illegal_count", "posts"."inappropriate_count", "posts"."last_version_at", "posts"."user_deleted", "posts"."reply_to_user_id", "posts"."percent_rank", "posts"."notify_user_count", "posts"."like_score", "posts"."deleted_by_id", "posts"."edit_reason", "posts"."word_count", "posts"."version", "posts"."cook_method", "posts"."wiki", "posts"."baked_at", "posts"."baked_version", "posts"."hidden_at", "posts"."self_edits", "posts"."reply_quoted", "posts"."via_email", "posts"."raw_email", "posts"."public_version", "posts"."action_code", "posts"."locked_by_id", "posts"."image_upload_id" FROM "posts" JOIN (SELECT *, row_number() over() row_number FROM (SELECT topics.id, min(posts.post_number) post_number FROM "posts" INNER JOIN "post_search_data" ON "post_search_data"."post_id" = "posts"."id" INNER JOIN "topics" ON "topics"."id" = "posts"."topic_id" AND ("topics"."deleted_at" IS NULL) LEFT JOIN categories ON categories.id = topics.category_id WHERE ("posts"."deleted_at" IS NULL) AND "posts"."post_type" IN (1, 2, 3, 4) AND (topics.visible) AND (topics.archetype <> 'private_message') AND (post_search_data.search_data @@ TO_TSQUERY('english', '''postgres'':*ABCD')) AND (categories.id NOT IN (
SELECT categories.id WHERE categories.search_priority = 1
)
) AND ((categories.id IS NULL) OR (NOT categories.read_restricted)) GROUP BY topics.id ORDER BY MAX((
TS_RANK_CD(
post_search_data.search_data,
TO_TSQUERY('english', '''postgres'':*ABCD'),
1|32
) *
(
CASE categories.search_priority
WHEN 2
THEN 0.6
WHEN 3
THEN 0.8
WHEN 4
THEN 1.2
WHEN 5
THEN 1.4
ELSE
CASE WHEN topics.closed
THEN 0.9
ELSE 1
END
END
)
)
) DESC, topics.bumped_at DESC LIMIT 51 OFFSET 0) xxx) x ON x.id = posts.topic_id AND x.post_number = posts.post_number WHERE ("posts"."deleted_at" IS NULL) ORDER BY row_number;
SQL
end
x.report("current aggregate search query with proper ranking") do
DB.exec <<~SQL
SELECT "posts"."id", "posts"."user_id", "posts"."topic_id", "posts"."post_number", "posts"."raw", "posts"."cooked", "posts"."created_at", "posts"."updated_at", "posts"."reply_to_post_number", "posts"."reply_count", "posts"."quote_count", "posts"."deleted_at", "posts"."off_topic_count", "posts"."like_count", "posts"."incoming_link_count", "posts"."bookmark_count", "posts"."score", "posts"."reads", "posts"."post_type", "posts"."sort_order", "posts"."last_editor_id", "posts"."hidden", "posts"."hidden_reason_id", "posts"."notify_moderators_count", "posts"."spam_count", "posts"."illegal_count", "posts"."inappropriate_count", "posts"."last_version_at", "posts"."user_deleted", "posts"."reply_to_user_id", "posts"."percent_rank", "posts"."notify_user_count", "posts"."like_score", "posts"."deleted_by_id", "posts"."edit_reason", "posts"."word_count", "posts"."version", "posts"."cook_method", "posts"."wiki", "posts"."baked_at", "posts"."baked_version", "posts"."hidden_at", "posts"."self_edits", "posts"."reply_quoted", "posts"."via_email", "posts"."raw_email", "posts"."public_version", "posts"."action_code", "posts"."locked_by_id", "posts"."image_upload_id" FROM "posts" JOIN (SELECT *, row_number() over() row_number FROM (SELECT subquery.topic_id id, (ARRAY_AGG(subquery.post_number))[1] post_number, MAX(subquery.rank) rank, MAX(subquery.bumped_at) bumped_at FROM (SELECT "posts"."id", "posts"."user_id", "posts"."topic_id", "posts"."post_number", "posts"."raw", "posts"."cooked", "posts"."created_at", "posts"."updated_at", "posts"."reply_to_post_number", "posts"."reply_count", "posts"."quote_count", "posts"."deleted_at", "posts"."off_topic_count", "posts"."like_count", "posts"."incoming_link_count", "posts"."bookmark_count", "posts"."score", "posts"."reads", "posts"."post_type", "posts"."sort_order", "posts"."last_editor_id", "posts"."hidden", "posts"."hidden_reason_id", "posts"."notify_moderators_count", "posts"."spam_count", "posts"."illegal_count", "posts"."inappropriate_count", "posts"."last_version_at", "posts"."user_deleted", "posts"."reply_to_user_id", "posts"."percent_rank", "posts"."notify_user_count", "posts"."like_score", "posts"."deleted_by_id", "posts"."edit_reason", "posts"."word_count", "posts"."version", "posts"."cook_method", "posts"."wiki", "posts"."baked_at", "posts"."baked_version", "posts"."hidden_at", "posts"."self_edits", "posts"."reply_quoted", "posts"."via_email", "posts"."raw_email", "posts"."public_version", "posts"."action_code", "posts"."locked_by_id", "posts"."image_upload_id", (
TS_RANK_CD(
post_search_data.search_data,
TO_TSQUERY('english', '''postgres'':*ABCD'),
1|32
) *
(
CASE categories.search_priority
WHEN 2
THEN 0.6
WHEN 3
THEN 0.8
WHEN 4
THEN 1.2
WHEN 5
THEN 1.4
ELSE
CASE WHEN topics.closed
THEN 0.9
ELSE 1
END
END
)
)
rank, topics.bumped_at bumped_at FROM "posts" INNER JOIN "post_search_data" ON "post_search_data"."post_id" = "posts"."id" INNER JOIN "topics" ON "topics"."id" = "posts"."topic_id" AND ("topics"."deleted_at" IS NULL) LEFT JOIN categories ON categories.id = topics.category_id WHERE ("posts"."deleted_at" IS NULL) AND "posts"."post_type" IN (1, 2, 3, 4) AND (topics.visible) AND (topics.archetype <> 'private_message') AND (post_search_data.search_data @@ TO_TSQUERY('english', '''postgres'':*ABCD')) AND (categories.id NOT IN (
SELECT categories.id WHERE categories.search_priority = 1
)
) AND ((categories.id IS NULL) OR (NOT categories.read_restricted))) subquery GROUP BY subquery.topic_id ORDER BY rank DESC, bumped_at DESC LIMIT 51 OFFSET 0) xxx) x ON x.id = posts.topic_id AND x.post_number = posts.post_number WHERE ("posts"."deleted_at" IS NULL) ORDER BY row_number;
SQL
end
x.compare!
end
```
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
current aggregate search query
1.000 i/100ms
current aggregate search query with proper ranking
1.000 i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
current aggregate search query
17.726 (± 0.0%) i/s - 178.000 in 10.045107s
current aggregate search query with proper ranking
17.802 (± 0.0%) i/s - 178.000 in 10.002230s
Comparison:
current aggregate search query with proper ranking: 17.8 i/s
current aggregate search query: 17.7 i/s - 1.00x (± 0.00) slower
```
On large topics, the cost of sending the entire post ID list back over to the database is signficant. Just have the DB recalculate the list of visible posts instead.
