Fixed bug on candidate selection. I misinterpreted count and n_connections variables. Thus, renamed count as current_connection_count to make it more understandable.
This commit is contained in:
@ -37,8 +37,8 @@
|
||||
* that is required for each of the backend servers.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
typedef struct backend {
|
||||
SERVER *server; /**< The server itself */
|
||||
int count; /**< Number of connections to the server */
|
||||
SERVER *server; /**< The server itself */
|
||||
int current_connection_count; /**< Number of connections to the server */
|
||||
} BACKEND;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ int i, n;
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
inst->servers[n]->server = server;
|
||||
inst->servers[n]->count = 0;
|
||||
inst->servers[n]->current_connection_count = 0;
|
||||
n++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
inst->servers[n] = NULL;
|
||||
@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ int i;
|
||||
"Examine server in port %d with %d connections. Status is %d, "
|
||||
"inst->bitvalue is %d",
|
||||
inst->servers[i]->server->port,
|
||||
inst->servers[i]->count,
|
||||
inst->servers[i]->current_connection_count,
|
||||
inst->servers[i]->server->status,
|
||||
inst->bitmask);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -285,14 +285,13 @@ int i;
|
||||
our initial candidate server */
|
||||
if (candidate == NULL) {
|
||||
candidate = inst->servers[i];
|
||||
} else if (inst->servers[i]->server->stats.n_connections
|
||||
< candidate->server->stats.n_connections) {
|
||||
} else if (inst->servers[i]->current_connection_count < candidate->current_connection_count) {
|
||||
/* This running server has fewer
|
||||
connections, set it as a new candidate */
|
||||
candidate = inst->servers[i];
|
||||
} else if (inst->servers[i]->server->stats.n_connections
|
||||
== candidate->server->stats.n_connections &&
|
||||
inst->servers[i]->count < candidate->count) {
|
||||
} else if (inst->servers[i]->current_connection_count == candidate->current_connection_count &&
|
||||
inst->servers[i]->server->stats.n_connections
|
||||
< candidate->server->stats.n_connections) {
|
||||
/* This running server has the same number
|
||||
of connections currently as the candidate
|
||||
but has had fewer connections over time
|
||||
@ -302,15 +301,6 @@ int i;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (candidate) {
|
||||
skygw_log_write(
|
||||
LOGFILE_TRACE,
|
||||
"Selected server in port %d to as candidate. "
|
||||
"Connections : %d\n",
|
||||
candidate->server->port,
|
||||
candidate->count);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* no candidate server here, clean and return NULL */
|
||||
if (!candidate) {
|
||||
free(client);
|
||||
@ -321,15 +311,16 @@ int i;
|
||||
* We now have the server with the least connections.
|
||||
* Bump the connection count for this server
|
||||
*/
|
||||
atomic_add(&candidate->count, 1);
|
||||
atomic_add(&candidate->current_connection_count, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
client->backend = candidate;
|
||||
|
||||
skygw_log_write(
|
||||
LOGFILE_TRACE,
|
||||
"Final selection is server in port %d. "
|
||||
"Connections : %d\n",
|
||||
candidate->server->port,
|
||||
candidate->count);
|
||||
candidate->current_connection_count);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Open a backend connection, putting the DCB for this
|
||||
* connection in the client->dcb
|
||||
@ -338,7 +329,7 @@ int i;
|
||||
if ((client->dcb = dcb_connect(candidate->server, session,
|
||||
candidate->server->protocol)) == NULL)
|
||||
{
|
||||
atomic_add(&candidate->count, -1);
|
||||
atomic_add(&candidate->current_connection_count, -1);
|
||||
free(client);
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -370,7 +361,7 @@ CLIENT_SESSION *session = (CLIENT_SESSION *)router_session;
|
||||
* Close the connection to the backend
|
||||
*/
|
||||
session->dcb->func.close(session->dcb);
|
||||
atomic_add(&session->backend->count, -1);
|
||||
atomic_add(&session->backend->current_connection_count, -1);
|
||||
atomic_add(&session->backend->server->stats.n_current, -1);
|
||||
|
||||
spinlock_acquire(&inst->lock);
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user