Removed useless comments
This commit is contained in:
@ -1389,10 +1389,6 @@ static route_target_t get_shard_route_target (
|
||||
/** hints don't affect on routing */
|
||||
target = TARGET_ALL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* else */
|
||||
/* { */
|
||||
/* target = TARGET_NAMED_SERVER; */
|
||||
/* } */
|
||||
#if defined(SS_DEBUG)
|
||||
LOGIF(LT, (skygw_log_write(
|
||||
LOGFILE_TRACE,
|
||||
@ -1869,24 +1865,6 @@ static int routeQuery(
|
||||
* Find out whether the query should be routed to single server or to
|
||||
* all of them.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Find out where to route the query. Result may not be clear; it is
|
||||
* possible to have a hint for routing to a named server which can
|
||||
* be either slave or master.
|
||||
* If query would otherwise be routed to slave then the hint determines
|
||||
* actual target server if it exists.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* route_target is a bitfield and may include :
|
||||
* TARGET_ALL
|
||||
* - route to all connected backend servers
|
||||
* TARGET_SLAVE[|TARGET_NAMED_SERVER|TARGET_RLAG_MAX]
|
||||
* - route primarily according to hints, then to slave and if those
|
||||
* failed, eventually to master
|
||||
* TARGET_MASTER[|TARGET_NAMED_SERVER|TARGET_RLAG_MAX]
|
||||
* - route primarily according to the hints and if they failed,
|
||||
* eventually to master
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
if((tname = get_shard_target_name(inst,router_cli_ses,querybuf)) != NULL)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bool shard_ok = check_shard_status(inst,tname);
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user