hcq/MaxScale
hcq/MaxScale
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

MXS-400: Servers that are both master and slave now work with readwritesplit

Browse Source 
The check for the server status explicitly denied servers that are both master
and slave from being chosed as candidates for queries. This is only a problem
when a user manually sets the server states to both master and slave.

The monitors resolve the replication topology based on the servers that
the monitors see and this always results in at least one slave server.
This commit is contained in:
Markus Makela 2016-02-04 11:16:44 +02:00
parent 4a4f22c9a7
commit c506559452
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
server/include/server.h
View File

@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ typedef struct server {
#define SERVER_IS_MASTER(server) SRV_MASTER_STATUS((server)->status)
#define SRV_MASTER_STATUS(status) ((status & \
(SERVER_RUNNING|SERVER_MASTER|SERVER_SLAVE|SERVER_MAINT)) == \
(SERVER_RUNNING|SERVER_MASTER|SERVER_MAINT)) == \
(SERVER_RUNNING|SERVER_MASTER))
/**
@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ typedef struct server {
* in order for the macro to return true
*/
#define SERVER_IS_SLAVE(server) \
(((server)->status & (SERVER_RUNNING|SERVER_MASTER|SERVER_SLAVE|SERVER_MAINT)) == \
(((server)->status & (SERVER_RUNNING|SERVER_SLAVE|SERVER_MAINT)) == \
(SERVER_RUNNING|SERVER_SLAVE))
/**