By repeatedly doing reads instead of one read per second, it is more
likely that MXS-2311 is reproduced. This is still not a deterministic
process but in theory it can reproduce the problem.
Whitespace in section names have been deprecated since 2.2 and will
be rejected in 2.4. Consequently, the configuration files of the
system tests must be updated.
Added a test case that does a set of sanity checks on the monitor. As the
monitor is very simple, there are not a lot of things to test without
access to the actual instances (e.g. ExeMgr failures need to be tested).
Currently the test always passes as ColumnStore clusters aren't
implemented for the test framework.
Removed the tests obsoleted by the sanity_check test case. This shortens
the test time by about a minute and a half and removes about 2500 lines of code.
This should help prevent network disconnections and make the test more
stable. If the connection is lost, the automatic failover is disabled and
the test will fail.
The test doesn't work when ASAN is used as it increases the memory use of
the process. With the addition of more caches in 2.3, the test is also
more likely to fail. Due to the test being quite useless with ASAN, it is
better to remove it.
Now the test program will
1) Write to each node in a Galera cluster and verify that the data
ends up in the slave.
2) At the end of 1) execute STOP SLAVE and START SLAVE to check that
replication can be stopped and started again (won't work unless
each node has the same server_id and value for @@log_bin_basename).
3) Block the node BLR is replicating from and expect it to connect
to the next configured master and that replication continues to
work. Do that for all nodes.
4) Stop MaxScale and restart it and expect 3) to work. That checks
that BLR saves all necessary information in master.ini and is
capable of reading it.
It should be possible to START SLAVE and STOP SLAVE irrespective
of which Galera node updates are mode to.
That will be the case if @@log_slave_updates is on and each node
in the Galera cluster have the same server id. Otherwise it will
fail with the current incarnation of BLR.
If
* BLR replicates from a node in a Galera cluster and
* writes are made to all nodes in that cluster,
then
* if a slave to BLR is stopped when it has received an event
originating in a node different than the one BLR is replicating
from
the subsequent (re)starting of the slave will fail because BLR looks
for the last event from a file whose path contains the server id of
the node where the event originates, although it should look for it
in the file whose path contains the server id of the node from which
BLR replicates.
The behavior of mariadbmon was changed so that it better understands
slaves attempting to replicate. Rewrote the test to accommodate the change
in behavior and take the opportunity to use newer code.
