Some manual changes done to the library were lost with this update. They will be added in the next commit.
		
			
				
	
	
		
			198 lines
		
	
	
		
			8.3 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			HTML
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			198 lines
		
	
	
		
			8.3 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			HTML
		
	
	
	
	
	
<html>
 | 
						|
<head>
 | 
						|
<title>pcre2perform specification</title>
 | 
						|
</head>
 | 
						|
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#00005A" link="#0066FF" alink="#3399FF" vlink="#2222BB">
 | 
						|
<h1>pcre2perform man page</h1>
 | 
						|
<p>
 | 
						|
Return to the <a href="index.html">PCRE2 index page</a>.
 | 
						|
</p>
 | 
						|
<p>
 | 
						|
This page is part of the PCRE2 HTML documentation. It was generated
 | 
						|
automatically from the original man page. If there is any nonsense in it,
 | 
						|
please consult the man page, in case the conversion went wrong.
 | 
						|
<br>
 | 
						|
<ul>
 | 
						|
<li><a name="TOC1" href="#SEC1">PCRE2 PERFORMANCE</a>
 | 
						|
<li><a name="TOC2" href="#SEC2">COMPILED PATTERN MEMORY USAGE</a>
 | 
						|
<li><a name="TOC3" href="#SEC3">STACK USAGE AT RUN TIME</a>
 | 
						|
<li><a name="TOC4" href="#SEC4">PROCESSING TIME</a>
 | 
						|
<li><a name="TOC5" href="#SEC5">AUTHOR</a>
 | 
						|
<li><a name="TOC6" href="#SEC6">REVISION</a>
 | 
						|
</ul>
 | 
						|
<br><a name="SEC1" href="#TOC1">PCRE2 PERFORMANCE</a><br>
 | 
						|
<P>
 | 
						|
Two aspects of performance are discussed below: memory usage and processing
 | 
						|
time. The way you express your pattern as a regular expression can affect both
 | 
						|
of them.
 | 
						|
</P>
 | 
						|
<br><a name="SEC2" href="#TOC1">COMPILED PATTERN MEMORY USAGE</a><br>
 | 
						|
<P>
 | 
						|
Patterns are compiled by PCRE2 into a reasonably efficient interpretive code,
 | 
						|
so that most simple patterns do not use much memory. However, there is one case
 | 
						|
where the memory usage of a compiled pattern can be unexpectedly large. If a
 | 
						|
parenthesized subpattern has a quantifier with a minimum greater than 1 and/or
 | 
						|
a limited maximum, the whole subpattern is repeated in the compiled code. For
 | 
						|
example, the pattern
 | 
						|
<pre>
 | 
						|
  (abc|def){2,4}
 | 
						|
</pre>
 | 
						|
is compiled as if it were
 | 
						|
<pre>
 | 
						|
  (abc|def)(abc|def)((abc|def)(abc|def)?)?
 | 
						|
</pre>
 | 
						|
(Technical aside: It is done this way so that backtrack points within each of
 | 
						|
the repetitions can be independently maintained.)
 | 
						|
</P>
 | 
						|
<P>
 | 
						|
For regular expressions whose quantifiers use only small numbers, this is not
 | 
						|
usually a problem. However, if the numbers are large, and particularly if such
 | 
						|
repetitions are nested, the memory usage can become an embarrassment. For
 | 
						|
example, the very simple pattern
 | 
						|
<pre>
 | 
						|
  ((ab){1,1000}c){1,3}
 | 
						|
</pre>
 | 
						|
uses 51K bytes when compiled using the 8-bit library. When PCRE2 is compiled
 | 
						|
with its default internal pointer size of two bytes, the size limit on a
 | 
						|
compiled pattern is 64K code units in the 8-bit and 16-bit libraries, and this
 | 
						|
is reached with the above pattern if the outer repetition is increased from 3
 | 
						|
to 4. PCRE2 can be compiled to use larger internal pointers and thus handle
 | 
						|
larger compiled patterns, but it is better to try to rewrite your pattern to
 | 
						|
use less memory if you can.
 | 
						|
</P>
 | 
						|
<P>
 | 
						|
One way of reducing the memory usage for such patterns is to make use of
 | 
						|
PCRE2's
 | 
						|
<a href="pcre2pattern.html#subpatternsassubroutines">"subroutine"</a>
 | 
						|
facility. Re-writing the above pattern as
 | 
						|
<pre>
 | 
						|
  ((ab)(?2){0,999}c)(?1){0,2}
 | 
						|
</pre>
 | 
						|
reduces the memory requirements to 18K, and indeed it remains under 20K even
 | 
						|
with the outer repetition increased to 100. However, this pattern is not
 | 
						|
exactly equivalent, because the "subroutine" calls are treated as
 | 
						|
<a href="pcre2pattern.html#atomicgroup">atomic groups</a>
 | 
						|
into which there can be no backtracking if there is a subsequent matching
 | 
						|
failure. Therefore, PCRE2 cannot do this kind of rewriting automatically.
 | 
						|
Furthermore, there is a noticeable loss of speed when executing the modified
 | 
						|
pattern. Nevertheless, if the atomic grouping is not a problem and the loss of
 | 
						|
speed is acceptable, this kind of rewriting will allow you to process patterns
 | 
						|
that PCRE2 cannot otherwise handle.
 | 
						|
</P>
 | 
						|
<br><a name="SEC3" href="#TOC1">STACK USAGE AT RUN TIME</a><br>
 | 
						|
<P>
 | 
						|
When <b>pcre2_match()</b> is used for matching, certain kinds of pattern can
 | 
						|
cause it to use large amounts of the process stack. In some environments the
 | 
						|
default process stack is quite small, and if it runs out the result is often
 | 
						|
SIGSEGV. Rewriting your pattern can often help. The
 | 
						|
<a href="pcre2stack.html"><b>pcre2stack</b></a>
 | 
						|
documentation discusses this issue in detail.
 | 
						|
</P>
 | 
						|
<br><a name="SEC4" href="#TOC1">PROCESSING TIME</a><br>
 | 
						|
<P>
 | 
						|
Certain items in regular expression patterns are processed more efficiently
 | 
						|
than others. It is more efficient to use a character class like [aeiou] than a
 | 
						|
set of single-character alternatives such as (a|e|i|o|u). In general, the
 | 
						|
simplest construction that provides the required behaviour is usually the most
 | 
						|
efficient. Jeffrey Friedl's book contains a lot of useful general discussion
 | 
						|
about optimizing regular expressions for efficient performance. This document
 | 
						|
contains a few observations about PCRE2.
 | 
						|
</P>
 | 
						|
<P>
 | 
						|
Using Unicode character properties (the \p, \P, and \X escapes) is slow,
 | 
						|
because PCRE2 has to use a multi-stage table lookup whenever it needs a
 | 
						|
character's property. If you can find an alternative pattern that does not use
 | 
						|
character properties, it will probably be faster.
 | 
						|
</P>
 | 
						|
<P>
 | 
						|
By default, the escape sequences \b, \d, \s, and \w, and the POSIX
 | 
						|
character classes such as [:alpha:] do not use Unicode properties, partly for
 | 
						|
backwards compatibility, and partly for performance reasons. However, you can
 | 
						|
set the PCRE2_UCP option or start the pattern with (*UCP) if you want Unicode
 | 
						|
character properties to be used. This can double the matching time for items
 | 
						|
such as \d, when matched with <b>pcre2_match()</b>; the performance loss is
 | 
						|
less with a DFA matching function, and in both cases there is not much
 | 
						|
difference for \b.
 | 
						|
</P>
 | 
						|
<P>
 | 
						|
When a pattern begins with .* not in atomic parentheses, nor in parentheses
 | 
						|
that are the subject of a backreference, and the PCRE2_DOTALL option is set,
 | 
						|
the pattern is implicitly anchored by PCRE2, since it can match only at the
 | 
						|
start of a subject string. If the pattern has multiple top-level branches, they
 | 
						|
must all be anchorable. The optimization can be disabled by the
 | 
						|
PCRE2_NO_DOTSTAR_ANCHOR option, and is automatically disabled if the pattern
 | 
						|
contains (*PRUNE) or (*SKIP).
 | 
						|
</P>
 | 
						|
<P>
 | 
						|
If PCRE2_DOTALL is not set, PCRE2 cannot make this optimization, because the
 | 
						|
dot metacharacter does not then match a newline, and if the subject string
 | 
						|
contains newlines, the pattern may match from the character immediately
 | 
						|
following one of them instead of from the very start. For example, the pattern
 | 
						|
<pre>
 | 
						|
  .*second
 | 
						|
</pre>
 | 
						|
matches the subject "first\nand second" (where \n stands for a newline
 | 
						|
character), with the match starting at the seventh character. In order to do
 | 
						|
this, PCRE2 has to retry the match starting after every newline in the subject.
 | 
						|
</P>
 | 
						|
<P>
 | 
						|
If you are using such a pattern with subject strings that do not contain
 | 
						|
newlines, the best performance is obtained by setting PCRE2_DOTALL, or starting
 | 
						|
the pattern with ^.* or ^.*? to indicate explicit anchoring. That saves PCRE2
 | 
						|
from having to scan along the subject looking for a newline to restart at.
 | 
						|
</P>
 | 
						|
<P>
 | 
						|
Beware of patterns that contain nested indefinite repeats. These can take a
 | 
						|
long time to run when applied to a string that does not match. Consider the
 | 
						|
pattern fragment
 | 
						|
<pre>
 | 
						|
  ^(a+)*
 | 
						|
</pre>
 | 
						|
This can match "aaaa" in 16 different ways, and this number increases very
 | 
						|
rapidly as the string gets longer. (The * repeat can match 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4
 | 
						|
times, and for each of those cases other than 0 or 4, the + repeats can match
 | 
						|
different numbers of times.) When the remainder of the pattern is such that the
 | 
						|
entire match is going to fail, PCRE2 has in principle to try every possible
 | 
						|
variation, and this can take an extremely long time, even for relatively short
 | 
						|
strings.
 | 
						|
</P>
 | 
						|
<P>
 | 
						|
An optimization catches some of the more simple cases such as
 | 
						|
<pre>
 | 
						|
  (a+)*b
 | 
						|
</pre>
 | 
						|
where a literal character follows. Before embarking on the standard matching
 | 
						|
procedure, PCRE2 checks that there is a "b" later in the subject string, and if
 | 
						|
there is not, it fails the match immediately. However, when there is no
 | 
						|
following literal this optimization cannot be used. You can see the difference
 | 
						|
by comparing the behaviour of
 | 
						|
<pre>
 | 
						|
  (a+)*\d
 | 
						|
</pre>
 | 
						|
with the pattern above. The former gives a failure almost instantly when
 | 
						|
applied to a whole line of "a" characters, whereas the latter takes an
 | 
						|
appreciable time with strings longer than about 20 characters.
 | 
						|
</P>
 | 
						|
<P>
 | 
						|
In many cases, the solution to this kind of performance issue is to use an
 | 
						|
atomic group or a possessive quantifier.
 | 
						|
</P>
 | 
						|
<br><a name="SEC5" href="#TOC1">AUTHOR</a><br>
 | 
						|
<P>
 | 
						|
Philip Hazel
 | 
						|
<br>
 | 
						|
University Computing Service
 | 
						|
<br>
 | 
						|
Cambridge, England.
 | 
						|
<br>
 | 
						|
</P>
 | 
						|
<br><a name="SEC6" href="#TOC1">REVISION</a><br>
 | 
						|
<P>
 | 
						|
Last updated: 02 January 2015
 | 
						|
<br>
 | 
						|
Copyright © 1997-2015 University of Cambridge.
 | 
						|
<br>
 | 
						|
<p>
 | 
						|
Return to the <a href="index.html">PCRE2 index page</a>.
 | 
						|
</p>
 |