[FEAT MERGE]4_1_sql_feature
Co-authored-by: leslieyuchen <leslieyuchen@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Charles0429 <xiezhenjiang@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: raywill <hustos@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
@ -296,6 +296,26 @@ struct ObExprBasicFuncs
|
||||
|
||||
ObExprCmpFuncType null_first_cmp_;
|
||||
ObExprCmpFuncType null_last_cmp_;
|
||||
|
||||
/* murmur_hash_v2_ is more efficient than murmur_hash_
|
||||
If there is no problem of compatibility, use hash_v2_ is a better choice
|
||||
|
||||
For example, if we calc hash of NUMBER,
|
||||
|
||||
murmur_hash_ calcs like that :
|
||||
if (datum.is_null()) {
|
||||
const int null_type = ObNullType;
|
||||
v = murmurhash64A(&null_type, sizeof(null_type), seed);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
uint64_t tmp_v = murmurhash64A(datum.get_number_desc().se_, 1, seed);
|
||||
v = murmurhash64A(datum.get_number_digits(), static_cast<uint64_t>(sizeof(uint32_t)* datum.get_number_desc().len_), tmp_v);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
murmur_hash_v2_ calc like that :
|
||||
v = murmurhash64A(datum.ptr_, datum.len_, seed);
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ObExprHashFuncType murmur_hash_v2_;
|
||||
ObBatchDatumHashFunc murmur_hash_v2_batch_;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user