Fix bugs of ddl reap old replica build task
This commit is contained in:
@ -2238,7 +2238,7 @@ int ObSyncTabletAutoincSeqCtx::call_and_process_all_tablet_autoinc_seqs(P &proxy
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int ObDDLRedefinitionTask::try_reap_old_replica_build_task()
|
||||
int ObDDLRedefinitionTask::reap_old_replica_build_task(bool &need_exec_new_inner_sql)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret = OB_SUCCESS;
|
||||
ObSchemaGetterGuard schema_guard;
|
||||
@ -2261,17 +2261,19 @@ int ObDDLRedefinitionTask::try_reap_old_replica_build_task()
|
||||
const ObTabletID unused_tablet_id;
|
||||
const ObDDLTaskInfo unused_addition_info;
|
||||
const int old_ret_code = OB_SUCCESS;
|
||||
bool need_exec_new_inner_sql = true;
|
||||
ObAddr invalid_addr;
|
||||
(void)ObCheckTabletDataComplementOp::check_and_wait_old_complement_task(tenant_id_, dest_table_id,
|
||||
if (old_execution_id < 0) {
|
||||
need_exec_new_inner_sql = true;
|
||||
} else if (OB_FAIL(ObCheckTabletDataComplementOp::check_and_wait_old_complement_task(tenant_id_, dest_table_id,
|
||||
task_id_, old_execution_id, invalid_addr, trace_id_,
|
||||
table_schema->get_schema_version(), snapshot_version_, need_exec_new_inner_sql);
|
||||
if (!need_exec_new_inner_sql) {
|
||||
if (OB_FAIL(update_complete_sstable_job_status(unused_tablet_id, snapshot_version_, old_execution_id, old_ret_code, unused_addition_info))) {
|
||||
LOG_INFO("succ to wait and complete old task finished!", K(ret));
|
||||
table_schema->get_schema_version(), snapshot_version_, need_exec_new_inner_sql))) {
|
||||
if (OB_EAGAIN != ret) {
|
||||
LOG_WARN("failed to check and wait old complement task", K(ret));
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if (!need_exec_new_inner_sql) {
|
||||
if (OB_FAIL(update_complete_sstable_job_status(unused_tablet_id, snapshot_version_, old_execution_id, old_ret_code, unused_addition_info))) {
|
||||
LOG_WARN("failed to wait and complete old task finished!", K(ret));
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
ret = OB_ENTRY_NOT_EXIST;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user