The new option set of pg_receivewal introduced in 042a923 to control the
compression method makes it now easy to pass down various options,
including the compression level. The change to be able to do is simple,
and requires one LZ4F_preferences_t fed to LZ4F_compressBegin().
Note that LZ4F_INIT_PREFERENCES could be used to initialize the contents
of LZ4F_preferences_t as required by LZ4, but this is only available
since v1.8.3. memset()'ing its structure to 0 is enough.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YlPQGNAAa04raObK@paquier.xyz
Since babbbb5 and the introduction of LZ4 in pg_receivewal, the
compression of the WAL archived is controlled by two options:
- --compression-method with "gzip", "none" or "lz4" as possible value.
- --compress=N to specify a compression level. This includes a
backward-incompatible change where a value of 0 leads to a failure
instead of no compression enforced.
This commit takes advantage of a4b5754 and 3603f7c to rework the
compression options of pg_receivewal, as of:
- The removal of --compression-method.
- The extenction of --compress to use the same grammar as pg_basebackup,
with a METHOD:DETAIL format, where a METHOD is "gzip", "none" or "lz4"
and a DETAIL is a comma-separated list of options, the only keyword
supported is now "level" to control the compression level. If only an
integer is specified as value of this option, "none" is implied on 0
and "gzip" is implied otherwise. This brings back --compress to be
backward-compatible with ~14, while still supporting LZ4.
This has also the advantage of centralizing the set of checks used by
pg_receivewal to validate its compression options.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas, Georgios Kokolatos
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YlPQGNAAa04raObK@paquier.xyz
The same structure, with the same set of elements (for none, lz4, gzip
and zstd), exists in compression.h, so let's make use of the centralized
version instead of duplicating things. Some of the variables used
previously for WalCompressionMethod are renamed to stick better with the
new structure and routine names.
WalCompressionMethod was leading to some confusion in walmethods.c, as
it was sometimes used to refer to some data unrelated to WAL.
Reported-by: Robert Haas
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas, Georgios Kokolatos
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YlPQGNAAa04raObK@paquier.xyz
Compression option handling (level, algorithm or even workers) can be
used across several parts of the system and not only base backups.
Structures, objects and routines are renamed in consequence, to remove
the concept of base backups from this part of the code making this
change straight-forward.
pg_receivewal, that has gained support for LZ4 since babbbb5, will make
use of this infrastructure for its set of compression options, bringing
more consistency with pg_basebackup. This cleanup needs to be done
before releasing a beta of 15. pg_dump is a potential future target, as
well, and adding more compression options to it may happen in 16~.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas, Georgios Kokolatos
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YlPQGNAAa04raObK@paquier.xyz
wrasse, at least, moans about the lack of any "return" statement
in these functions. You'd think pretty much everything would
know that exit(1) doesn't return, but evidently not.
Get rid of the separate "FATAL" log level, as it was applied
so inconsistently as to be meaningless. This mostly involves
s/pg_log_fatal/pg_log_error/g.
Create a macro pg_fatal() to handle the common use-case of
pg_log_error() immediately followed by exit(1). Various
modules had already invented either this or equivalent macros;
standardize on pg_fatal() and apply it where possible.
Invent the ability to add "detail" and "hint" messages to a
frontend message, much as we have long had in the backend.
Except where rewording was needed to convert existing coding
to detail/hint style, I have (mostly) resisted the temptation
to change existing message wording.
Patch by me. Design and patch reviewed at various stages by
Robert Haas, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Peter Eisentraut and
Daniel Gustafsson.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1363732.1636496441@sss.pgh.pa.us
Exclusive-mode backups have been deprecated since 9.6 (when
non-exclusive backups were introduced) due to the issues
they can cause should the system crash while one is running and
generally because non-exclusive provides a much better interface.
Further, exclusive backup mode wasn't really being tested (nor was most
of the related code- like being able to log in just to stop an exclusive
backup and the bits of the state machine related to that) and having to
possibly deal with an exclusive backup and the backup_label file
existing during pg_basebackup, pg_rewind, etc, added other complexities
that we are better off without.
This patch removes the exclusive backup mode, the various special cases
for dealing with it, and greatly simplifies the online backup code and
documentation.
Authors: David Steele, Nathan Bossart
Reviewed-by: Chapman Flack
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ac7339ca-3718-3c93-929f-99e725d1172c@pgmasters.nethttps://postgr.es/m/CAHg+QDfiM+WU61tF6=nPZocMZvHDzCK47Kneyb0ZRULYzV5sKQ@mail.gmail.com
Before this patch, there was some code that tried to make sure that the
buffer was always big enough at the start, and then asserted that it
didn't need to be enlarged later. However, the code to make sure it was
big enough at the start doesn't actually work, and therefore it was
possible to fail an assertion and crash later.
Remove the code that tries to make sure the buffer is always big enough
at the start in favor of enlarging the buffer as we go along whenever
that is necessary.
The mistake probably happened because, on the server side, we do
actually need to guarantee that the buffer is big enough at the start
to avoid subsequent resizings. However, in that case, the calling
code makes promises about how much data it will provide at once, but
here, that's not the case.
Report by Justin Pryzby. Analysis by me. Patch by Dipesh Pandit.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/20220330143536.GG28503@telsasoft.com
libzstd allows transparent parallel compression just by setting
an option when creating the compression context, so permit that
for both client and server-side backup compression. To use this,
use something like pg_basebackup --compress WHERE-zstd:workers=N
where WHERE is "client" or "server" and N is an integer.
When compression is performed on the server side, this will spawn
threads inside the PostgreSQL backend. While there is almost no
PostgreSQL server code which is thread-safe, the threads here are used
internally by libzstd and touch only data structures controlled by
libzstd.
Patch by me, based in part on earlier work by Dipesh Pandit
and Jeevan Ladhe. Reviewed by Justin Pryzby.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobj6u-nWF-j=FemygUhobhryLxf9h-wJN7W-2rSsseHNA@mail.gmail.com
When we try to set the zstd compression level either on the client
or on the server, check for errors.
For any algorithm, on the client side, don't try to set the compression
level unless the user specified one. This was visibly broken for
zstd, which managed to set -1 rather than 0 in this case, but tidy
up the code for the other methods, too.
On the client side, if we fail to create a ZSTD_CCtx, exit after
reporting the error. Otherwise we'll dereference a null pointer.
Patch by me, reviewed by Dipesh Pandit.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZK3zLQUCGi1h4XZw4jHiAWtcACc+GsdJR1_Mc19jUjXA@mail.gmail.com
The previous method for doing that was to write zeroes into a
predetermined set of page locations. However, there's a roughly
1-in-64K chance that the existing checksum will match by chance,
and yesterday several buildfarm animals started to reproducibly
see that, resulting in test failures because no checksum mismatch
was reported.
Since the checksum includes the page LSN, test success depends on
the length of the installation's WAL history, which is affected by
(at least) the initial catalog contents, the set of locales installed
on the system, and the length of the pathname of the test directory.
Sooner or later we were going to hit a chance match, and today is
that day.
Harden these tests by specifically inverting the checksum field and
leaving all else alone, thereby guaranteeing that the checksum is
incorrect.
In passing, fix places that were using seek() to set up for syswrite(),
a combination that the Perl docs very explicitly warn against. We've
probably escaped problems because no regular buffered I/O is done on
these filehandles; but if it ever breaks, we wouldn't deserve or get
much sympathy.
Although we've only seen problems in HEAD, now that we recognize the
environmental dependencies it seems like it might be just a matter
of time until someone manages to hit this in back-branch testing.
Hence, back-patch to v11 where we started doing this kind of test.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3192026.1648185780@sss.pgh.pa.us
Commit ffd53659c46a54a6978bcb8c4424c1e157a2c0f1 messed up the
mechanism that was being used to pass parameters to LogStreamerMain()
on Windows. It worked on Linux because only Windows was using threads.
Repair by moving the additional parameters added by that commit into
the 'logstreamer_param' struct.
Along the way, fix a compiler warning on builds without HAVE_LIBZ.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoY5=AmWOtMj3v+cySP2rR=Bt6EGyF_joAq4CfczMddKtw@mail.gmail.com
There are more compression parameters that can be specified than just
an integer compression level, so rename the new COMPRESSION_LEVEL
option to COMPRESSION_DETAIL before it gets released. Introduce a
flexible syntax for that option to allow arbitrary options to be
specified without needing to adjust the main replication grammar,
and common code to parse it that is shared between the client and
the server.
This commit doesn't actually add any new compression parameters,
so the only user-visible change is that you can now type something
like pg_basebackup --compress gzip:level=5 instead of writing just
pg_basebackup --compress gzip:5. However, it should make it easy to
add new options. If for example gzip starts offering fries, we can
support pg_basebackup --compress gzip:level=5,fries=true for the
benefit of users who want fries with that.
Along the way, this fixes a few things in pg_basebackup so that the
pg_basebackup can be used with a server-side compression algorithm
that pg_basebackup itself does not understand. For example,
pg_basebackup --compress server-lz4 could still succeed even if
only the server and not the client has LZ4 support, provided that
the other options to pg_basebackup don't require the client to
decompress the archive.
Patch by me. Reviewed by Justin Pryzby and Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYvpetyRAbbg1M8b3-iHsaN4nsgmWPjOENu5-doHuJ7fA@mail.gmail.com
lz4frame.h was getting declared after the headers specific to Postgres,
but it needs to be included between postgres_fe.h and the internal
headers.
Issue introduced by babbbb5.
Reported-by: Justin Prysby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220317111220.GI28503@telsasoft.com
These tests were added recently, but older code tests USE_LZ4 rathr
than HAVE_LIBLZ4, so let's follow the established precedent. It
also seems more consistent with the intent of the configure tests,
since I think that the USE_* symbols are intended to correspond to
what the user requested, and the HAVE_* symbols to what configure
found while probing.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmoap+hTD2-QNPJLH4tffeFE8MX5+xkbFKMU3FKBy=ZSNKA@mail.gmail.com
Fail with a suitable error message instead. We can't inject the backup
manifest into the output tarfile without decompressing it, and if
we did that, we'd have to recompress the tarfile afterwards to produce
the result the user is expecting. While we have enough infrastructure
in pg_basebackup now to accomplish that whole series of steps without
much additional code, it seems like excessively surprising behavior.
The user probably did not select server-side compression with the idea
that the client was going to end up decompressing it and then
recompressing.
Report from Justin Pryzby. Fix by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmob6Rnjz-Qv32h3yJn8nnUkLhrtQDAS4y5AtsgtorAFHRA@mail.gmail.com
Both client-side compression and server-side compression are now
supported for zstd. In addition, a backup compressed by the server
using zstd can now be decompressed by the client in order to
accommodate the use of -Fp.
Jeevan Ladhe, with some edits by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobyzfbz=gyze2_LL1ZumZunmaEKbHQxjrFkOR7APZGu-g@mail.gmail.com
I have not been able to reproduce the occasional failures of
019_replslot_limit.pl we are seeing in the buildfarm and not for lack of
trying. The additional logging and increased log level will hopefully help.
Will be reverted once the cause is identified.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220218231415.c4plkp4i3reqcwip@alap3.anarazel.de
Ill-considered refactoring in 23a1c6578 led to progress_filename
sometimes pointing to data that had gone out of scope. The most
bulletproof fix is to hang onto a copy of whatever's passed in.
Compared to the work spent elsewhere per file, that's not very
expensive, plus we can skip it except in verbose logging mode.
Per buildfarm.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220212211316.GK31460@telsasoft.com
Rather than doing manual book keeping to plan the number of tests to run
in each TAP suite, conclude each run with done_testing() summing up the
the number of tests that ran. This removes the need for maintaning and
updating the plan count at the expense of an accurate count of remaining
during the test suite runtime.
This patch has been discussed a number of times, often in the context of
other patches which updates tests, so a larger number of discussions can
be found in the archives.
Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/DD399313-3D56-4666-8079-88949DAC870F@yesql.se
LZ4 compression can now be performed on the client using
pg_basebackup -Ft --compress client-lz4, and LZ4 decompression of
a backup compressed on the server can be performed on the client
using pg_basebackup -Fp --compress server-lz4.
Dipesh Pandit, reviewed and tested by Jeevan Ladhe and Tushar Ahuja,
with a few corrections - and some documentation - by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAN1g5_FeDmiA9D8wdG2W6Lkq5CpubxOAqTmd2et9hsinTJtsMQ@mail.gmail.com
LZ4 compression can be a lot faster than gzip compression, so users
may prefer it even if the compression ratio is not as good. We will
want pg_basebackup to support LZ4 compression and decompression on the
client side as well, and there is a pending patch for that, but it's
by a different author, so I am committing this part separately for
that reason.
Jeevan Ladhe, reviewed by Tushar Ahuja and by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CANm22Cg9cArXEaYgHVZhCnzPLfqXCZLAzjwTq7Fc0quXRPfbxA@mail.gmail.com
Commit 8e2b6d45a0 added a new unprivileged user for testing
pg_basebackup, but omitted to add them to the cluster's authorized
logins, breaking Windows tests run without using Unix sockets.
When this code executed as superuser it appeared to work because no
system catalog lookups happened, but otherwise it crashes because there
is no transaction environment. Fix that.
Report and code change by me. Test case by Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmobiKLXne-2AVzYyWRiO8=rChBQ=7ywoxp=2SmcFw=oDDw@mail.gmail.com
Tushar Ahuja discovered that if you use both --compress and --gzip,
or --compress multiple times, the last instance of one of these
options doesn't in all cases overwrite the compression level set by
an earlier option. That's not a serious bug, but it also has nothing
to recommend it. Repair.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZfP=rsZB_9vDGfhuNgSu_M_09UWu8SjvsP65y_1pQFCg@mail.gmail.com
I intended to include a change to the "skip" count in the test
case, but it didn't get folded into the commit. Do that now,
so that non-zlib builds don't break.
The new file bbstreamer_gzip.c needs <unistd.h> to avoid
complaints about dup() not having a prototype, as per buildfarm
returns.
If you have a low-bandwidth connection between the client and the
server, it's reasonable to want to compress on the server side but
then decompress and extract the backup on the client side. This
commit allows you do to do just that.
Dipesh Pandit, with minor and mostly cosmetic changes by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAN1g5_HiSh8ajUMd4ePtGyCXo89iKZTzaNyzP_qv1eJbi4YHXA@mail.gmail.com
The server expects the compression level to be between 1 and 9, but
Z_DEFAULT_COMPRESSION is -1, so we must not try to send that value
to the server.
Because pg_basebackup's -R option is implemented on the client side,
it can't be used in combination with a backup target. Error out if
someone tries that, instead of silently ignoring the option.
Both issues were reported by Tushar Ahuja; patch by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoaMwgdx8HxBjF8hmbohVvPL_0H5LqNrSq0uU+7BKp_Q2A@mail.gmail.com
Commit 0ad8032910d5eb8efd32867c45b6a25c85e60f50 failed to update
the pg_basebackup documentation to mention that "client-" or
"server-" can now be prepended to the compression method name. Fix
it there, and also in the --help output that you get from running
the binary.
Also in the documentation, there's an old issue that the arguments to
--checkpoint shouldn't be marked as parameters, because "fast" and
"spread" are literal strings. Fix that too.
Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker, partly as per a report from
Shinoda Noriyoshi.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/PH7PR84MB1885C1CF433057807551172BEE5F9@PH7PR84MB1885.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
pg_basebackup's --compression option now lets you write either
"client-gzip" or "server-gzip" instead of just "gzip" to specify
where the compression should be performed. If you write simply
"gzip" it's taken to mean "client-gzip" unless you also use
--target, in which case it is interpreted to mean "server-gzip",
because that's the only thing that makes any sense in that case.
To make this work, the BASE_BACKUP command now takes new
COMPRESSION and COMPRESSION_LEVEL options.
At present, pg_basebackup cannot decompress .gz files, so
server-side compression will cause a failure if (1) -Ft is not
used or (2) -R is used or (3) -D- is used without --no-manifest.
Along the way, I removed the information message added by commit
5c649fe153367cdab278738ee4aebbfd158e0546 which occurred if you
specified no compression level and told you that the default level
had been used instead. That seemed like more output than most
people would want.
Also along the way, this adds a check to the server for
unrecognized base backup options. This repairs a bug introduced
by commit 0ba281cb4bf9f5f65529dfa4c8282abb734dd454.
This commit also adds some new test cases for pg_verifybackup.
They take a server-side backup with and without compression, and
then extract the backup if we have the OS facilities available
to do so, and then run pg_verifybackup on the extracted
directory. That is a good test of the functionality added by
this commit and also improves test coverage for the backup target
patch (commit 3500ccc39b0dadd1068a03938e4b8ff562587ccc) and for
pg_verifybackup itself.
Patch by me, with a bug fix by Jeevan Ladhe. The patch set of which
this is a part has also had review and/or testing from Tushar Ahuja,
Suraj Kharage, Dipesh Pandit, and Mark Dilger.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmoa-ST7fMLsVJduOB7Eub=2WjfpHS+QxHVEpUoinf4bOSg@mail.gmail.com
