Commit Graph

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
3e70da2781 Always use the caller-provided context for radix tree leaves
Previously, it would not have worked for a caller to pass a slab
context, since it would have been used for other things which likely
had incompatible size. In an attempt to be helpful and avoid possible
space wastage due to aset's power-of-two rounding, RT_CREATE would
create an additional slab context if the value type was fixed-length
and larger than pointer size. The problem was, we have since added
the bump context type, and the generation context was a possibility as
well, so silently overriding the caller's choice may actually be worse.

Commit e8a6f1f908d arranged so that the caller-provided context is
used only for leaves, so it's safe for the caller to use slab here
if they wish. As demonstration, use slab in one of the radix tree
regression tests.

Reviewed by Masahiko Sawada

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANWCAZZDCo4k5oURg_pPxM6+WZ1oiG=sqgjmQiELuyP0Vtrwig@mail.gmail.com
2025-01-06 13:26:02 +07:00
e8a6f1f908 Get rid of radix tree's general purpose memory context
Previously, this was notionally used only for the entry point of the
tree and as a convenient parent for other contexts.

For shared memory, the creator previously allocated the entry point
in this context, but attaching backends didn't have access to that,
so they just used the caller's context. For the sake of consistency,
allocate every instance of an entry point in the caller's context.

For local memory, allocate the control object in the caller's context
as well. This commit also makes the "leaf context" the notional parent
of the child contexts used for nodes, so it's a bit of a misnomer,
but a future commit will make the node contexts independent rather
than children, so leave it this way for now to avoid code churn.

The memory context parameter for RT_CREATE is now unused in the case
of shared memory, so remove it and adjust callers to match.

In passing, remove unused "context" member from struct TidStore,
which seems to have been an oversight.

Reviewed by Masahiko Sawada

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANWCAZZDCo4k5oURg_pPxM6+WZ1oiG=sqgjmQiELuyP0Vtrwig@mail.gmail.com
2025-01-06 11:21:21 +07:00
50e6eb731d Update copyright for 2025
Backpatch-through: 13
2025-01-01 11:21:55 -05:00
efdc7d7475 Add INT64_HEX_FORMAT and UINT64_HEX_FORMAT to c.h.
Like INT64_FORMAT and UINT64_FORMAT, these macros produce format
strings for 64-bit integers.  However, INT64_HEX_FORMAT and
UINT64_HEX_FORMAT generate the output in hexadecimal instead of
decimal.  Besides introducing these macros, this commit makes use
of them in several places.  This was originally intended to be part
of commit 5d6187d2a2, but I left it out because I felt there was a
nonzero chance that back-patching these new macros into c.h could
cause problems with third-party code.  We tend to be less cautious
with such changes in new major versions.

Note that UINT64_HEX_FORMAT was originally added in commit
ee1b30f128, but it was placed in test_radixtree.c, so it wasn't
widely available.  This commit moves UINT64_HEX_FORMAT to c.h.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZwQvtUbPKaaRQezd%40nathan
2024-11-22 12:41:57 -06:00
9be4e5d293 Remove unused #include's from contrib, pl, test .c files
as determined by IWYU

Similar to commit dbbca2cf299, but for contrib, pl, and src/test/.

Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/0df1d5b1-8ca8-4f84-93be-121081bde049%40eisentraut.org
2024-10-28 08:02:17 +01:00
da256a4a7f Pre-beta mechanical code beautification.
Run pgindent, pgperltidy, and reformat-dat-files.

The pgindent part of this is pretty small, consisting mainly of
fixing up self-inflicted formatting damage from patches that
hadn't bothered to add their new typedefs to typedefs.list.
In order to keep it from making anything worse, I manually added
a dozen or so typedefs that appeared in the existing typedefs.list
but not in the buildfarm's list.  Perhaps we should formalize that,
or better find a way to get those typedefs into the automatic list.

pgperltidy is as opinionated as always, and reformat-dat-files too.
2024-05-14 16:34:50 -04:00
6d9751fa8f Revert "Fix link error for test_radixtree module on Windows"
This reverts commit 9552e3ace317ac8bb0a80613c0e5cd6536c96dc8.

I (john) forgot to revert this locally when a more principled
fix was found, which has the same message title.
2024-03-08 11:09:15 +07:00
ab6ae62603 Fix link error for test_radixtree module on Windows
Add PGDLLIMPORT to pg_popcount32/64. In passing, fix a typo.

Diagnosis by Masahiko Sawada, patch by David Rowley

Per buildfarm members drongo and fairywren

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoAMm1mQd%3Dw4PrfrKK%3DOMP8j8%3D7ntJRPF8%2B%3D10iUuvwiCA%40mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvov7724UrD1Ug0D1eV%2B9Pd_x5VEQmw-6HVG9w1WdCxXPA%40mail.gmail.com
2024-03-08 10:57:40 +07:00
9552e3ace3 Fix link error for test_radixtree module on Windows
Add back "link_with" directive, similar to the one removed by 1f1d73a8b,
but only for Windows, but use the "_shlib" variation.

Diagnosis by Masahiko Sawada, proposed fix adjusted and tested by me

Per buildfarm members drongo and fairywren

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoAMm1mQd%3Dw4PrfrKK%3DOMP8j8%3D7ntJRPF8%2B%3D10iUuvwiCA%40mail.gmail.com
2024-03-08 10:25:23 +07:00
1f1d73a8b8 Blind attempt to fix ODR violations
Remove apparently useless "link_with" directive. Even if this isn't the
root cause, it makes the .build file more like the other test modules.

Reviewed by Masahiko Sawada

Follow-up to ee1b30f12, per buildfarm members olingo and grassquit.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANWCAZaJAaO8MimTU%2BY-DZutM6HQLQu%3DK2HyoQULdB3v_6BSCg%40mail.gmail.com
2024-03-07 17:01:07 +07:00
ee1b30f128 Add template for adaptive radix tree
This implements a radix tree data structure based on the design in
"The Adaptive Radix Tree: ARTful Indexing for Main-Memory Databases"
by Viktor Leis, Alfons Kemper, and ThomasNeumann, 2013. The main
technique that makes it adaptive is using several different node types,
each with a different capacity of elements, and a different algorithm
for accessing them. The nodes start small and grow/shrink as needed.

The main advantage over hash tables is efficient sorted iteration and
better memory locality when successive keys are lexicographically
close together. The implementation currently assumes 64-bit integer
keys, and traversing the tree is in general slower than a linear
probing hash table, so this is not a general-purpose associative array.

The paper describes two other techniques not implemented here,
namely "path compression" and "lazy expansion". These can further
reduce memory usage and speed up traversal, but the former would add
significant complexity and the latter requires storing the full key
with the value. We do trivially compress the path when leading bytes
of the key are zeros, however.

For value storage, we use "combined pointer/value slots", as
recommended in the paper. Values of size equal or smaller than the the
platform's pointer type are stored in the array of child pointers in
the last level node, while larger values are each stored in a separate
allocation. This is for now fixed at compile time, but it would be
fairly trivial to allow determining at runtime how variable-length
values are stored.

One innovation in our implementation compared to the ART paper is
decoupling the notion of node "size class" from "kind". The size
classes within a given node kind have the same underlying type, but
a variable capacity for children, so we can introduce additional node
sizes with little additional code.

To enable different use cases to specialize for different value types
and for shared/local memory, we use macro-templatized code generation
in the same manner as simplehash.h and sort_template.h.

Future commits will use this infrastructure for storing TIDs.

Patch by Masahiko Sawada and John Naylor, but a substantial amount of
credit is due to Andres Freund, whose proof-of-concept was a valuable
source of coding idioms and awareness of performance pitfalls, and
who reviewed earlier versions.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoAfOZvmfR0j8VmZorZjL7RhTiQdVttNuC4W-Shdc2a-AA%40mail.gmail.com
2024-03-07 12:40:11 +07:00