Result nodes now include an RTI set, which is only non-NULL when they
have no subplan, and is taken from the relid set of the RelOptInfo that
the Result is generating. ExplainPreScanNode now takes notice of these
RTIs, which means that a few things get schema-qualified in the
regression tests that previously did not. This makes the output more
consistent between cases where some part of the plan tree is replaced by
a Result node and those where this does not happen.
Likewise, pg_overexplain's EXPLAIN (RANGE_TABLE) now displays the RTIs
stored in a Result node just as it already does for other RTI-bearing
node types.
Result nodes also now include a result_reason, which tells us something
about why the Result node was inserted. Using that information, EXPLAIN
now emits, where relevant, a "Replaces" line describing the origin of
a Result node.
The purpose of these changes is to allow code that inspects a Plan
tree to understand the origin of Result nodes that appear therein.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYeUZePZWLsSO+1FAN7UPePT_RMEZBKkqYBJVCF1s60=w@mail.gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Alexandra Wang <alexandra.wang.oss@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com>
The lossy-counting algorithm that ANALYZE uses to identify most-common
array elements has a notion of cutoff frequency: elements with
frequency greater than that are guaranteed to be collected, elements
with smaller frequencies are not. In cases where we find fewer MCEs
than the stats target would permit us to store, the cutoff frequency
provides valuable additional information, to wit that there are no
non-MCEs with frequency greater than that. What the selectivity
estimation functions actually use the "minfreq" entry for is as a
ceiling on the possible frequency of non-MCEs, so using the cutoff
rather than the lowest stored MCE frequency provides a tighter bound
and more accurate estimates.
Therefore, instead of redundantly storing the minimum observed MCE
frequency, store the cutoff frequency when there are fewer tracked
values than we want. (When there are more, then of course we cannot
assert that no non-stored elements are above the cutoff frequency,
since we're throwing away some that are; so we still use the
minimum stored frequency in that case.)
Notably, this works even when none of the values are common enough
to be called MCEs. In such cases we previously stored nothing in
the STATISTIC_KIND_MCELEM pg_statistic slot, which resulted in the
selectivity functions falling back to default estimates. So in that
case we want to construct a STATISTIC_KIND_MCELEM entry that contains
no "values" but does have "numbers", to wit the three extra numbers
that the MCELEM entry type defines. A small obstacle is that
update_attstats() has traditionally stored a null, not an empty array,
when passed zero "values" for a slot. That gives rise to an MCELEM
entry that get_attstatsslot() will spit up on. The least risky
solution seems to be to adjust update_attstats() so that it will emit
a non-null (but possibly empty) array when the passed stavalues array
pointer isn't NULL, rather than conditioning that on numvalues > 0.
In other existing cases I don't believe that that changes anything.
For consistency, handle the stanumbers array the same way.
In passing, improve the comments in routines that use
STATISTIC_KIND_MCELEM data. Particularly, explain why we use
minfreq / 2 not minfreq as the estimate for non-MCE values.
Thanks to Matt Long for the suggestion that we could apply this
idea even when there are more than zero MCEs.
Reported-by: Mark Frost <FROSTMAR@uk.ibm.com>
Reported-by: Matt Long <matt@mattlong.org>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/PH3PPF1C905D6E6F24A5C1A1A1D8345B593E16FA@PH3PPF1C905D6E6.namprd15.prod.outlook.com
Commit 216a784829c introduced parallel apply workers, allowing multiple
processes to share a replication origin. To support this,
replorigin_session_setup() was extended to accept a pid argument
identifying the process using the origin.
This commit exposes that capability through the SQL interface function
pg_replication_origin_session_setup() by adding an optional pid parameter.
This enables multiple processes to coordinate replication using the same
origin when using SQL-level replication functions.
This change allows the non-builtin logical replication solutions to
implement parallel apply for large transactions.
Additionally, an existing internal error was made user-facing, as it can
now be triggered via the exposed SQL API.
Author: Doruk Yilmaz <doruk@mixrank.com>
Author: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMPB6wfe4zLjJL8jiZV5kjjpwBM2=rTRme0UCL7Ra4L8MTVdOg@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAE2gYzyTSNvHY1+iWUwykaLETSuAZsCWyryokjP6rG46ZvRgQA@mail.gmail.com
This change is a tighter rework of 7d85d87f4d5c, which tried to improve
the code so as it would work should PgStat_HashKey gain new fields that
create padding bytes. However, the previous change is proving to not be
enough as some code paths of pgstats do not pass PgStat_HashKey by
reference (valgrind would warn when padding is added to the structure,
through a new field).
Per discussion, let's document and check that PgStat_HashKey has no
padding rather than try to complicate the code of pgstats so as it is
able to work around that.
This removes a couple of memset(0) calls that should not be required.
While on it, this commit adds a static assertion checking that no
padding is introduced in the structure, by checking that the size of
PgStat_HashKey matches with the sum of the size of all its fields.
The object ID part of the hash key is already 8 bytes, which should be
plenty enough already. A comment is added to discourage the addition of
new fields.
Author: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA5RZ0t9omat+HVSakJXwTMWvhpYFcAZb41RPWKwrKFUgmAFBQ@mail.gmail.com
Up to now we've contented ourselves with a one-size-fits-all error
hint when we fail to find any match to a function or procedure call.
That was mostly okay in the beginning, but it was never great, and
since the introduction of named arguments it's really not adequate.
We at least ought to distinguish "function name doesn't exist" from
"function name exists, but not with those argument names". And the
rules for named-argument matching are arcane enough that some more
detail seems warranted if we match the argument names but the call
still doesn't work.
This patch creates a framework for dealing with these problems:
FuncnameGetCandidates and related code will now pass back a bitmask of
flags showing how far the match succeeded. This allows a considerable
amount of granularity in the reports. The set-bits-in-a-bitmask
approach means that when there are multiple candidate functions, the
report will reflect the match(es) that got the furthest, which seems
correct. Also, we can avoid mentioning "maybe add casts" unless
failure to match argument types is actually the issue.
Extend the same return-a-bitmask approach to OpernameGetCandidates.
The issues around argument names don't apply to operator syntax,
but it still seems worth distinguishing between "there is no
operator of that name" and "we couldn't match the argument types".
While at it, adjust these messages and related ones to more strictly
separate "detail" from "hint", following our message style guidelines'
distinction between those.
Reported-by: Dominique Devienne <ddevienne@gmail.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1756041.1754616558@sss.pgh.pa.us
Fix for commit 3c86223c998. That commit moved the typedef of pg_int64
from postgres_ext.h to libpq-fe.h, because the only remaining place
where it might be used is libpq users, and since the type is obsolete,
the intent was to limit its scope.
The problem is that if someone builds an extension against an
older (pre-PG18) server version and a new (PG18) libpq, they might get
two typedefs, depending on include file order. This is not allowed
under C99, so they might get warnings or errors, depending on the
compiler and options. The underlying types might also be
different (e.g., long int vs. long long int), which would also lead to
errors. This scenario is plausible when using the standard Debian
packaging, which provides only the newest libpq but per-major-version
server packages.
The fix is to undo that part of commit 3c86223c998. That way, the
typedef is in the same header file across versions. At least, this is
the safest fix doable before PostgreSQL 18 releases.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/25144219-5142-4589-89f8-4e76948b32db%40eisentraut.org
Commit 7202d72787d added in passing some const qualifiers, but the one
on the postmaster_child_launch() startup_data argument was incorrect,
because the function itself modifies the pointed-to data. This is
hidden from the compiler because of casts. The qualifiers on the
functions called by postmaster_child_launch() are still correct.
In EXEC_BACKEND builds, GetNamedLWLockTranche() can segfault when
called outside of the postmaster process, as it might access
NamedLWLockTrancheRequestArray, which won't be initialized. Given
the lack of reports, this is apparently unusual, presumably because
it is usually called from a shmem_startup_hook like this:
mystruct = ShmemInitStruct(..., &found);
if (!found)
{
mystruct->locks = GetNamedLWLockTranche(...);
...
}
This genre of shmem_startup_hook evades the aforementioned
segfaults because the struct is initialized in the postmaster, so
all other callers skip the !found path.
We considered modifying the documentation or requiring
GetNamedLWLockTranche() to be called from the postmaster, but
ultimately we decided to simply move the request array to shared
memory (and add it to the BackendParameters struct), thereby
allowing calls outside postmaster on all platforms. Since the main
shared memory segment is initialized after accepting LWLock tranche
requests, postmaster builds the request array in local memory first
and then copies it to shared memory later.
Given the lack of reports, back-patching seems unnecessary.
Reported-by: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA5RZ0v1_15QPg5Sqd2Qz5rh_qcsyCeHHmRDY89xVHcy2yt5BQ%40mail.gmail.com
The comment mistakenly had "the others" for "the other", but this
commit also reorders the comment so it matches the macros below. Now we
describe the levels in increasing strictness. In addition, it seems
easier to follow if we introduce one level at a time, rather than
describing two, followed by "the other" (and then jumping back to one of
the first two). Finally, reword the sentence about the purpose of the
macros, which was slightly off-point.
Author: Paul Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Rustam ALLAKOV <rustamallakov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+renyUp=xja80rBaB6NpY3RRdi750y046x28bo_xg29zKY72Q@mail.gmail.com
hash_xlog.h included descriptions for the blocks used in WAL records
that were was not completely consistent with how the records are
generated, with one block missing for SQUEEZE_PAGE, and inconsistent
descriptions used for block 0 in VACUUM_ONE_PAGE and MOVE_PAGE_CONTENTS.
This information was incorrect since c11453ce0aea, cross-checking the
logic for the record generation.
Author: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALdSSPj1j=a1d1hVA3oabRFz0hSU3KKrYtZPijw4UPUM7LY9zw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
Instead of building a separate memory context that's used just
for running hash functions, make the hash functions run in the
per-tuple context of the node's innerecontext. This saves a
little space at runtime, and it avoids needing to reset two
contexts instead of one inside buildSubPlanHash's main loop.
This largely reverts commit 133924e13. That's safe to do now
because bf6c614a2 decoupled the evaluation context used by
TupleHashTableMatch from that used for hash function evaluation,
so that there's no longer a risk of resetting the innerecontext
too soon.
Per discussion of bug #19040, although this is not directly
a fix for that.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Haiyang Li <mohen.lhy@alibaba-inc.com>
Reviewed-by: Fei Changhong <feichanghong@qq.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19040-c9b6073ef814f48c@postgresql.org
f83d709760d8 refactored xl_heap_prune and added an unused member,
reason. While PruneReason is used when constructing this WAL record to
set the WAL record definition, it doesn't need to be stored in a
separate field in the record. Remove it.
We won't backport this, since modifying an exposed struct definition to
remove an unused field would do more harm than good.
Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/tvvtfoxz5ykpsctxjbzxg3nldnzfc7geplrt2z2s54pmgto27y%40hbijsndifu45
This commit fixes three issues:
1) When a disabled subscription is created with retain_dead_tuples set to true,
the launcher is not woken up immediately, which may lead to delays in creating
the conflict detection slot.
Creating the conflict detection slot is essential even when the subscription is
not enabled. This ensures that dead tuples are retained, which is necessary for
accurately identifying the type of conflict during replication.
2) Conflict-related data was unnecessarily retained when the subscription does
not have a table.
3) Conflict-relevant data could be prematurely removed before applying
prepared transactions on the publisher that are in the commit critical section.
This issue occurred because the backend executing COMMIT PREPARED was not
accounted for during the computation of oldestXid in the commit phase on
the publisher. As a result, the subscriber could advance the conflict
slot's xmin without waiting for such COMMIT PREPARED transactions to
complete.
We fixed this issue by identifying prepared transactions that are in the
commit critical section during computation of oldestXid in commit phase.
Author: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS9PR01MB16913DACB64E5721872AA5C02943BA@OS9PR01MB16913.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS9PR01MB16913F67856B0DA2A909788129400A@OS9PR01MB16913.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
This commit allows to log the raw parse tree in the same way we
currently log the parse tree, rewritten tree, and plan tree.
To avoid unnecessary log noise for users not interested in this
detail, a new GUC option, "debug_print_raw_parse", has been added.
When starting the PostgreSQL process with "-d N", and N is 3 or higher,
debug_print_raw_parse is enabled automatically, alongside
debug_print_parse.
Author: Chao Li <lic@highgo.com>
Reviewed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>
Reviewed-by: John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEoWx2mcO0Gpo4vd8kPMAFWeJLSp0MeUUnaLdE1x0tSVd-VzUw%40mail.gmail.com
This set of changes removes the list of available buffers and instead simply
uses the clock-sweep algorithm to find and return an available buffer. This
also removes the have_free_buffer() function and simply caps the
pg_autoprewarm process to at most NBuffers.
While on the surface this appears to be removing an optimization it is in fact
eliminating code that induces overhead in the form of synchronization that is
problematic for multi-core systems.
The main reason for removing the freelist, however, is not the moderate
improvement in scalability, but that having the freelist would require
dedicated complexity in several upcoming patches. As we have not been able to
find a case benefiting from the freelist...
Author: Greg Burd <greg@burd.me>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/70C6A5B5-2A20-4D0B-BC73-EB09DD62D61C@getmailspring.com
When executing a MERGE UPDATE action, if there is more than one
concurrent update of the target row, the lock-and-retry code would
sometimes incorrectly identify the latest version of the target tuple,
leading to incorrect results.
This was caused by using the ctid field from the TM_FailureData
returned by table_tuple_lock() in a case where the result was TM_Ok,
which is unsafe because the TM_FailureData struct is not guaranteed to
be fully populated in that case. Instead, it should use the tupleid
passed to (and updated by) table_tuple_lock().
To reduce the chances of similar errors in the future, improve the
commentary for table_tuple_lock() and TM_FailureData to make it
clearer that table_tuple_lock() updates the tid passed to it, and most
fields of TM_FailureData should not be relied on in non-failure cases.
An exception to this is the "traversed" field, which is set in both
success and failure cases.
Reported-by: Dmitry <dsy.075@yandex.ru>
Author: Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1570d30e-2b95-4239-b9c3-f7bf2f2f8556@yandex.ru
Backpatch-through: 15
This commit changes some functions related to the data type numeric to
use the soft error reporting rather than a custom boolean flag (called
"have_error") that callers of these functions could rely on to bypass
the generation of ERROR reports, letting the callers do their own error
handling (timestamp, jsonpath and numeric_to_char() require them).
This results in the removal of some boilerplate code that was required
to handle both the ereport() and the "have_error" code paths bypassing
ereport(), unifying everything under the soft error reporting facility.
While on it, some duplicated error messages are removed. The function
upgraded in this commit were suffixed with "_opt_error" in their names.
They are renamed to "_safe" instead.
This change relies on d9f7f5d32f20, that has introduced the soft error
reporting infrastructure.
Author: Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAJ_b96No5h5tRuR+KhcC44YcYUCw8WAHuLoqqyyop8_k3+JDQ@mail.gmail.com
pg_lsn includes pg_lsn_in_internal() for the purpose of parsing a LSN
position for the GUC recovery_target_lsn (21f428ebde39). It relies on a
boolean called "have_error" that would be set when the LSN parsing
fails, then let its callers handle any errors.
d9f7f5d32f20 has added support for soft error reporting. This commit
removes some boilerplate code and switches the routine to use soft error
reporting directly, giving to the callers of pg_lsn_in_internal()
the possibility to be fed the error message generated on failure.
pg_lsn_in_internal() routine is renamed to pg_lsn_in_safe(), for
consistency with other similar routines that are given an escontext.
Author: Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAJ_b96No5h5tRuR+KhcC44YcYUCw8WAHuLoqqyyop8_k3+JDQ@mail.gmail.com
If an INSERT has an ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE clause, the executor must
check that the target relation supports UPDATE as well as INSERT. In
particular, it must check that the target relation has a REPLICA
IDENTITY if it publishes updates. Formerly, it was not doing this
check, which could lead to silently breaking replication.
Fix by adding such a check to CheckValidResultRel(), which requires
adding a new onConflictAction argument. In back-branches, preserve ABI
compatibility by introducing a wrapper function with the original
signature.
Author: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS3PR01MB57180C87E43A679A730482DF94B62@OS3PR01MB5718.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Backpatch-through: 13
There are two ways for shared libraries to allocate their own
LWLock tranches. One way is to call RequestNamedLWLockTranche() in
a shmem_request_hook, which requires the library to be loaded via
shared_preload_libraries. The other way is to call
LWLockNewTrancheId(), which is not subject to the same
restrictions. However, LWLockNewTrancheId() does require each
backend to store the tranche's name in backend-local memory via
LWLockRegisterTranche(). This API is a little cumbersome and leads
to things like unhelpful pg_stat_activity.wait_event values in
backends that haven't loaded the library.
This commit moves these LWLock tranche names to shared memory, thus
eliminating the need for each backend to call
LWLockRegisterTranche(). Instead, the tranche name must be
provided to LWLockNewTrancheId(), which immediately makes the name
available to all backends. Since the tranche name array is
append-only, lookups can ordinarily avoid locking as long as their
local copy of the LWLock counter is greater than the requested
tranche ID.
One downside of this approach is that we now have a hard limit on
both the length of tranche names (NAMEDATALEN-1 bytes) and the
number of dynamically-allocated tranches (256). Besides a limit of
NAMEDATALEN-1 bytes for tranche names registered via
RequestNamedLWLockTranche(), no such limits previously existed. We
could avoid these new limits by using dynamic shared memory, but
the complexity involved didn't seem worth it. We briefly
considered making the tranche limit user-configurable but
ultimately decided against that, too. Since there is still a lot
of time left in the v19 development cycle, it's possible we will
revisit this choice.
Author: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA5RZ0vvED3naph8My8Szv6DL4AxOVK3eTPS0qXsaKi%3DbVdW2A%40mail.gmail.com
Store the information in guc_tables.c in a .dat file similar to the
catalog data in src/include/catalog/, and generate a part of
guc_tables.c from that. The goal is to make it easier to edit that
information, and to be able to make changes to the downstream data
structures more easily. (Essentially, those are the same reasons as
for the original adoption of the .dat format.)
Reviewed-by: John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Reviewed-by: David E. Wheeler <david@justatheory.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/dae6fe89-1e0c-4c3f-8d92-19d23374fb10%40eisentraut.org
SLRU bank locks are referred as "bank locks" or "SLRU bank locks" in the
code comments. The comments updated in this commit use the latter term.
Oversight in 53c2a97a9266, that has replaced the single ControlLock by
the bank control locks.
Author: Julien Rouhaud <julien.rouhaud@free.fr>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aLUT2UO8RjJOzZNq@jrouhaud
Backpatch-through: 17
Note that this doesn't require bumping SLOT_VERSION because we
require sizeof(bool) == 1, thanks to commit 97525bc5c8.
Overight in commit ddd5f4f54a.
Discussion: Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
This change replaces seven functions definitions by macros, reducing a
bit some repetitive patterns in the code. An interesting side effect is
that this removes an inconsistency in the naming of SLRU increment
functions with the field names.
This change is similar to 850f4b4c8cab, 8018ffbf5895 or 83a1a1b56645.
Author: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aLHA//gr4dTpDHHC@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
This commit introduces a new subscription parameter,
max_retention_duration, aimed at mitigating excessive accumulation of dead
tuples when retain_dead_tuples is enabled and the apply worker lags behind
the publisher.
When the time spent advancing a non-removable transaction ID exceeds the
max_retention_duration threshold, the apply worker will stop retaining
conflict detection information. In such cases, the conflict slot's xmin
will be set to InvalidTransactionId, provided that all apply workers
associated with the subscription (with retain_dead_tuples enabled) confirm
the retention duration has been exceeded.
To ensure retention status persists across server restarts, a new column
subretentionactive has been added to the pg_subscription catalog. This
prevents unnecessary reactivation of retention logic after a restart.
The conflict detection slot will not be automatically re-initialized
unless a new subscription is created with retain_dead_tuples = true, or
the user manually re-enables retain_dead_tuples.
A future patch will introduce support for automatic slot re-initialization
once at least one apply worker confirms that the retention duration is
within the configured max_retention_duration.
Author: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB5716BE80DAEB0EE2A6A5D1F5949D2@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Using the LWLockCounter requires first calculating its address in
shared memory like this:
LWLockCounter = (int *) ((char *) MainLWLockArray - sizeof(int));
Commit 82e861fbe1 started this trend in order to fix EXEC_BACKEND
builds, but it could also be fixed by adding it to the
BackendParameters struct. The current approach is somewhat
difficult to follow, so this commit switches to the latter. While
at it, swap around the code in LWLockShmemSize() to match the order
of assignments in CreateLWLocks() for added readability.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aLDLnan9gNCS9fHx%40nathan
This has been done historically because of get_database_name (which
since commit cb98e6fb8fd4 belongs in lsyscache.c/h, so let's move it
there) and get_database_oid (which is in the right place, but whose
declaration should appear in pg_database.h rather than dbcommands.h).
Clean this up.
Also, xlogreader.h and stringinfo.h are no longer needed by dbcommands.h
since commit f1fd515b393a, so remove them.
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202508191031.5ipojyuaswzt@alvherre.pgsql
During an investigation into rather odd aio related errors on macos, observed
by Alexander and Konstantin, we started to wonder if bitfield access is
related to the error. At the moment it looks like it is related, we cannot
reproduce the failures when replacing the bitfields. In addition, the problem
can only be reproduced with some compiler [versions] and not everyone has been
able to reproduce the issue.
The observed problem is that, very rarely, PgAioHandle->{state,target} are in
an inconsistent state, after having been checked to be in a valid state not
long before, triggering an assertion failure. Unfortunately, this could be
caused by wrong compiler code generation or somehow of missing memory barriers
- we don't really know. In theory there should not be any concurrent write
access to the handle in the state the bug is triggered, as the handle was idle
and is just being initialized.
Separately from the bug, we observed that at least gcc and clang generate
rather terrible code for the bitfield access. Even if it's not clear if the
observed assertion failure is actually caused by the bitfield somehow, the bad
code generation alone is sufficient reason to stop using bitfields.
Therefore, replace the enum bitfields with uint8s and instead cast in each
switch statement.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@garret.ru>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1500090.1745443021@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 18
