Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
ff90ee6145 In REASSIGN OWNED of a database, lock the tuple as mandated.
Commit aac2c9b4fde889d13f859c233c2523345e72d32b mandated such locking
and attempted to fulfill that mandate, but it missed REASSIGN OWNED.
Hence, it remained possible to lose VACUUM's inplace update of
datfrozenxid if a REASSIGN OWNED processed that database at the same
time.  This didn't affect the other inplace-updated catalog, pg_class.
For pg_class, REASSIGN OWNED calls ATExecChangeOwner() instead of the
generic AlterObjectOwner_internal(), and ATExecChangeOwner() fulfills
the locking mandate.

Like in GRANT, implement this by following the locking protocol for any
catalog subject to the generic AlterObjectOwner_internal().  It would
suffice to do this for IsInplaceUpdateOid() catalogs only.  Back-patch
to v13 (all supported versions).

Kirill Reshke.  Reported by Alexander Kukushkin.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFh8B=mpKjAy4Cuun-HP-f_vRzh2HSvYFG3rhVfYbfEBUhBAGg@mail.gmail.com
2024-12-28 07:16:22 -08:00
0844b39689 Improve test coverage for changes to inplace-updated catalogs.
This covers both regular and inplace changes, since bugs arise at their
intersection.  Where marked, these witness extant bugs.  Back-patch to
v12 (all supported versions).

Reviewed (in an earlier version) by Robert Haas.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240512232923.aa.nmisch@google.com
2024-06-27 19:21:05 -07:00