Files
postgresql/src/test/regress/sql/point.sql
Peter Eisentraut c06d6aa4c3 Clean up ancient test style
Many older tests where written in a style like

    SELECT '' AS two, i.* FROM INT2_TBL

where the first column indicated the number of expected result rows.
This has gotten increasingly out of date, as the test data fixtures
have expanded, so a lot of these were wrong and misleading.  Moreover,
this style isn't really necessary, since the psql output already shows
the number of result rows.

To clean this up, remove all those extra columns.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/1a25312b-2686-380d-3c67-7a69094a999f%40enterprisedb.com
2020-12-15 22:03:39 +01:00

119 lines
3.6 KiB
SQL

--
-- POINT
--
-- avoid bit-exact output here because operations may not be bit-exact.
SET extra_float_digits = 0;
CREATE TABLE POINT_TBL(f1 point);
INSERT INTO POINT_TBL(f1) VALUES ('(0.0,0.0)');
INSERT INTO POINT_TBL(f1) VALUES ('(-10.0,0.0)');
INSERT INTO POINT_TBL(f1) VALUES ('(-3.0,4.0)');
INSERT INTO POINT_TBL(f1) VALUES ('(5.1, 34.5)');
INSERT INTO POINT_TBL(f1) VALUES ('(-5.0,-12.0)');
INSERT INTO POINT_TBL(f1) VALUES ('(1e-300,-1e-300)'); -- To underflow
INSERT INTO POINT_TBL(f1) VALUES ('(1e+300,Inf)'); -- To overflow
INSERT INTO POINT_TBL(f1) VALUES ('(Inf,1e+300)'); -- Transposed
INSERT INTO POINT_TBL(f1) VALUES (' ( Nan , NaN ) ');
-- bad format points
INSERT INTO POINT_TBL(f1) VALUES ('asdfasdf');
INSERT INTO POINT_TBL(f1) VALUES ('10.0,10.0');
INSERT INTO POINT_TBL(f1) VALUES ('(10.0 10.0)');
INSERT INTO POINT_TBL(f1) VALUES ('(10.0, 10.0) x');
INSERT INTO POINT_TBL(f1) VALUES ('(10.0,10.0');
INSERT INTO POINT_TBL(f1) VALUES ('(10.0, 1e+500)'); -- Out of range
SELECT * FROM POINT_TBL;
-- left of
SELECT p.* FROM POINT_TBL p WHERE p.f1 << '(0.0, 0.0)';
-- right of
SELECT p.* FROM POINT_TBL p WHERE '(0.0,0.0)' >> p.f1;
-- above
SELECT p.* FROM POINT_TBL p WHERE '(0.0,0.0)' |>> p.f1;
-- below
SELECT p.* FROM POINT_TBL p WHERE p.f1 <<| '(0.0, 0.0)';
-- equal
SELECT p.* FROM POINT_TBL p WHERE p.f1 ~= '(5.1, 34.5)';
-- point in box
SELECT p.* FROM POINT_TBL p
WHERE p.f1 <@ box '(0,0,100,100)';
SELECT p.* FROM POINT_TBL p
WHERE box '(0,0,100,100)' @> p.f1;
SELECT p.* FROM POINT_TBL p
WHERE not p.f1 <@ box '(0,0,100,100)';
SELECT p.* FROM POINT_TBL p
WHERE p.f1 <@ path '[(0,0),(-10,0),(-10,10)]';
SELECT p.* FROM POINT_TBL p
WHERE not box '(0,0,100,100)' @> p.f1;
SELECT p.f1, p.f1 <-> point '(0,0)' AS dist
FROM POINT_TBL p
ORDER BY dist;
SELECT p1.f1 AS point1, p2.f1 AS point2, p1.f1 <-> p2.f1 AS dist
FROM POINT_TBL p1, POINT_TBL p2
ORDER BY dist, p1.f1[0], p2.f1[0];
SELECT p1.f1 AS point1, p2.f1 AS point2
FROM POINT_TBL p1, POINT_TBL p2
WHERE (p1.f1 <-> p2.f1) > 3;
-- put distance result into output to allow sorting with GEQ optimizer - tgl 97/05/10
SELECT p1.f1 AS point1, p2.f1 AS point2, (p1.f1 <-> p2.f1) AS distance
FROM POINT_TBL p1, POINT_TBL p2
WHERE (p1.f1 <-> p2.f1) > 3 and p1.f1 << p2.f1
ORDER BY distance, p1.f1[0], p2.f1[0];
-- put distance result into output to allow sorting with GEQ optimizer - tgl 97/05/10
SELECT p1.f1 AS point1, p2.f1 AS point2, (p1.f1 <-> p2.f1) AS distance
FROM POINT_TBL p1, POINT_TBL p2
WHERE (p1.f1 <-> p2.f1) > 3 and p1.f1 << p2.f1 and p1.f1 |>> p2.f1
ORDER BY distance;
-- Test that GiST indexes provide same behavior as sequential scan
CREATE TEMP TABLE point_gist_tbl(f1 point);
INSERT INTO point_gist_tbl SELECT '(0,0)' FROM generate_series(0,1000);
CREATE INDEX point_gist_tbl_index ON point_gist_tbl USING gist (f1);
INSERT INTO point_gist_tbl VALUES ('(0.0000009,0.0000009)');
SET enable_seqscan TO true;
SET enable_indexscan TO false;
SET enable_bitmapscan TO false;
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM point_gist_tbl WHERE f1 ~= '(0.0000009,0.0000009)'::point;
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM point_gist_tbl WHERE f1 <@ '(0.0000009,0.0000009),(0.0000009,0.0000009)'::box;
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM point_gist_tbl WHERE f1 ~= '(0.0000018,0.0000018)'::point;
SET enable_seqscan TO false;
SET enable_indexscan TO true;
SET enable_bitmapscan TO true;
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM point_gist_tbl WHERE f1 ~= '(0.0000009,0.0000009)'::point;
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM point_gist_tbl WHERE f1 <@ '(0.0000009,0.0000009),(0.0000009,0.0000009)'::box;
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM point_gist_tbl WHERE f1 ~= '(0.0000018,0.0000018)'::point;
RESET enable_seqscan;
RESET enable_indexscan;
RESET enable_bitmapscan;