This is both an optimisation and a cleanup.
This converts code like
aStr.indexOf("XX") == 0
to
aStr.startsWith("XX")
and converts code like
aStr.lastIndexOf("XXX") == aStr.getLength() - 3
to
aStr.endsWith("XXX")
Note that in general
aStr.lastIndexOf("X") == aStr.getLength() - 1
converts to
aStr.isEmpty() || aStr.endsWith("X")
so I used the surrounding context to determine if aStr could be empty
when modifying the code.
Change-Id: I22cb8ca7c2a4d0288b001f72adb27fd63af87669
Convert places that call
aStr[aStr.getLength()-1] == 'x'
to use the shorter form
aStr.endsWith("x")
Change-Id: I1b3a19c0e89b8989cdbeed440f95fc76f9a4b6b6
Remove an odd {1} repeat count, and remove the "."{DIGIT}+ pattern that is
already covered by the following {DIGIT}*"."{DIGIT}+ pattern.
Change-Id: If99dfe10a5e37225355472bf4deceb34c0a92eb9
Compiler plugin to replace with matching number(), boolean() or OUString ctor,
ran it, few manual tweaks, mark as really deprecated.
Change-Id: I4a79bdbcf4c460d21e73b635d2bd3725c22876b2
lets try this hack, if it fails revert and I'll just
manually update the baseline with a newer flex than
flex-2.5.4a-41.fc6
Change-Id: If644489e80fc4e4cdba97808af0fe4d544d08646
Modules sal, salhelper, cppu, cppuhelper, codemaker (selectively) and odk
have kept them, in order not to break external API (the automatic using declaration
is LO-internal).
Change-Id: I588fc9e0c45b914f824f91c0376980621d730f09
...does not make sense. Adapted some old-style services accordingly, where the
inherited service had been changed to new-style after the fact.
Change-Id: I5f3e4ddf99160778a319062a6c84f83529ff177b
...replacing hard-coded GCC version checks. Those checks that guard
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wnon-virtual-dtor"
appear relevant only for GCC itself, not Clang (which used to fail the old
guards because it typically announces itself with a rather low
__GNUC__/__GNUC_MINOR__ version), see 6e67c03dc0225fc66343546b14e902b9d238b1a3
"Enable -Wnon-virtual-dtor for GCC 4.6"
Change-Id: I6bfa4d5caa6192e7a203ce829682bf6bb8d61a1b
Done with a perl regex:
s/OUString\s*\(\s*RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM\s*\((\s*"[^")]*?"\s*)\)\s*\)/OUString\($1\)/gms
Change-Id: Idf28320817cdcbea6d0f7ec06a9bf51bd2c3b3ec
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2832
Reviewed-by: Thomas Arnhold <thomas@arnhold.org>
Tested-by: Thomas Arnhold <thomas@arnhold.org>
Only applies to PropertyAttribute::REMOVEABLE, and all instances in comments.
All other instances of the misspelling have remained the same.
Example: AF_REMOVEABLE
Change-Id: I391f4101bbc3e06689318235a37d616065bc1686
Signed-off-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
...that had once been workarounds for compilers that did not yet support the
C++98 scoping rules for declarations in for-init-statements.
Change-Id: I51dc42982b30bf3adea6de1a10a91c0b4b4acfbe
...i.e., "const X = N;" declarations outside of constant groups. This appears
to be unused in practice, and removing it will allow to simplify future code
related to UNO type information.
This removes the definition of "constant-decl", and the branch mentioning
"constant-decl" from the definition of "declaration" at
<http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Documentation/DevGuide/AppendixD/UNOIDL_Syntax_Specification&oldid=137490>.
Change-Id: I218626f02ebd46ee438bf5453ca1510c9ed8e5f0
