forked from amazingfate/loongoffice
a6b53b5461
Earlier GCC already require a similar workaround to silence -Werror=return-type
("control reaches end of non-void function") a few lines further down, so it's
rather consequential that GCC now also warns about the potential fall-through
here (i.e., for these warnings, GCC apparently assumes that an enum can take on
all of the values from its range of values, not just those denoted by an
enumerator).
Change-Id: I1537a7f6975f900861225ee7a521366a5e57046a