Reformat the WebRTC code base

Running clang-format with chromium's style guide.

The goal is n-fold:
 * providing consistency and readability (that's what code guidelines are for)
 * preventing noise with presubmit checks and git cl format
 * building on the previous point: making it easier to automatically fix format issues
 * you name it

Please consider using git-hyper-blame to ignore this commit.

Bug: webrtc:9340
Change-Id: I694567c4cdf8cee2860958cfe82bfaf25848bb87
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/81185
Reviewed-by: Patrik Höglund <phoglund@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#23660}
This commit is contained in:
Yves Gerey
2018-06-19 15:03:05 +02:00
parent b602123a5a
commit 665174fdbb
1569 changed files with 30495 additions and 30309 deletions

View File

@ -166,8 +166,7 @@ TEST(TaskQueueTest, PostMultipleDelayed) {
std::vector<std::unique_ptr<Event>> events;
for (int i = 0; i < 100; ++i) {
events.push_back(std::unique_ptr<Event>(new Event(false, false)));
queue.PostDelayedTask(
Bind(&CheckCurrent, events.back().get(), &queue), i);
queue.PostDelayedTask(Bind(&CheckCurrent, events.back().get(), &queue), i);
}
for (const auto& e : events)
@ -191,9 +190,9 @@ TEST(TaskQueueTest, PostAndReply) {
TaskQueue post_queue(kPostQueue);
TaskQueue reply_queue(kReplyQueue);
post_queue.PostTaskAndReply(
Bind(&CheckCurrent, nullptr, &post_queue),
Bind(&CheckCurrent, &event, &reply_queue), &reply_queue);
post_queue.PostTaskAndReply(Bind(&CheckCurrent, nullptr, &post_queue),
Bind(&CheckCurrent, &event, &reply_queue),
&reply_queue);
EXPECT_TRUE(event.Wait(1000));
}
@ -372,12 +371,10 @@ TEST(TaskQueueTest, PostAndReplyDeadlock) {
EXPECT_TRUE(event.Wait(1000));
}
void TestPostTaskAndReply(TaskQueue* work_queue,
Event* event) {
void TestPostTaskAndReply(TaskQueue* work_queue, Event* event) {
ASSERT_FALSE(work_queue->IsCurrent());
work_queue->PostTaskAndReply(
Bind(&CheckCurrent, nullptr, work_queue),
NewClosure([event]() { event->Set(); }));
work_queue->PostTaskAndReply(Bind(&CheckCurrent, nullptr, work_queue),
NewClosure([event]() { event->Set(); }));
}
// Does a PostTaskAndReply from within a task to post and reply to the current
@ -389,8 +386,7 @@ TEST(TaskQueueTest, PostAndReply2) {
TaskQueue queue(kQueueName);
TaskQueue work_queue(kWorkQueueName);
queue.PostTask(
Bind(&TestPostTaskAndReply, &work_queue, &event));
queue.PostTask(Bind(&TestPostTaskAndReply, &work_queue, &event));
EXPECT_TRUE(event.Wait(1000));
}