Reformat the WebRTC code base
Running clang-format with chromium's style guide. The goal is n-fold: * providing consistency and readability (that's what code guidelines are for) * preventing noise with presubmit checks and git cl format * building on the previous point: making it easier to automatically fix format issues * you name it Please consider using git-hyper-blame to ignore this commit. Bug: webrtc:9340 Change-Id: I694567c4cdf8cee2860958cfe82bfaf25848bb87 Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/81185 Reviewed-by: Patrik Höglund <phoglund@webrtc.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#23660}
This commit is contained in:
@ -49,7 +49,8 @@ int TestClient::Send(const char* buf, size_t size) {
|
||||
return socket_->Send(buf, size, options);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int TestClient::SendTo(const char* buf, size_t size,
|
||||
int TestClient::SendTo(const char* buf,
|
||||
size_t size,
|
||||
const SocketAddress& dest) {
|
||||
rtc::PacketOptions options;
|
||||
return socket_->SendTo(buf, size, dest, options);
|
||||
@ -89,7 +90,8 @@ std::unique_ptr<TestClient::Packet> TestClient::NextPacket(int timeout_ms) {
|
||||
return packet;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool TestClient::CheckNextPacket(const char* buf, size_t size,
|
||||
bool TestClient::CheckNextPacket(const char* buf,
|
||||
size_t size,
|
||||
SocketAddress* addr) {
|
||||
bool res = false;
|
||||
std::unique_ptr<Packet> packet = NextPacket(kTimeoutMs);
|
||||
@ -138,8 +140,10 @@ int TestClient::SetOption(Socket::Option opt, int value) {
|
||||
return socket_->SetOption(opt, value);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void TestClient::OnPacket(AsyncPacketSocket* socket, const char* buf,
|
||||
size_t size, const SocketAddress& remote_addr,
|
||||
void TestClient::OnPacket(AsyncPacketSocket* socket,
|
||||
const char* buf,
|
||||
size_t size,
|
||||
const SocketAddress& remote_addr,
|
||||
const PacketTime& packet_time) {
|
||||
CritScope cs(&crit_);
|
||||
packets_.push_back(MakeUnique<Packet>(remote_addr, buf, size, packet_time));
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user