Reland "Use backticks not vertical bars to denote variables in comments for /pc"

Original change's description:
> Revert "Use backticks not vertical bars to denote variables in comments for /pc"
>
> This reverts commit 37ee0f5e594dd772ec6d620b5e5ea8a751b684f0.
>
> Reason for revert: Revert in order to be able to revert https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/225642
>
> Original change's description:
> > Use backticks not vertical bars to denote variables in comments for /pc
> >
> > Bug: webrtc:12338
> > Change-Id: I88cf10afa5fc810b95d2a585ab2e895dcc163b63
> > Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/226953
> > Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
> > Commit-Queue: Artem Titov <titovartem@webrtc.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34575}
>
> TBR=hta@webrtc.org,titovartem@webrtc.org,webrtc-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com
>
> Change-Id: I5eddd3a14e1f664bf831e5c294fbc4de5f6a88af
> No-Presubmit: true
> No-Tree-Checks: true
> No-Try: true
> Bug: webrtc:12338
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/227082
> Reviewed-by: Björn Terelius <terelius@webrtc.org>
> Commit-Queue: Björn Terelius <terelius@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34577}

Bug: webrtc:12338
Change-Id: I96bd229b73613c162d11d75fa4f5934e1b4295c7
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/227087
Commit-Queue: Artem Titov <titovartem@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34611}
This commit is contained in:
Artem Titov
2021-07-30 22:30:23 +02:00
committed by WebRTC LUCI CQ
parent c219a53c80
commit 880fa8169b
81 changed files with 535 additions and 535 deletions

View File

@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ using ::testing::Return;
namespace webrtc {
// These are used by gtest code, such as if |EXPECT_EQ| fails.
// These are used by gtest code, such as if `EXPECT_EQ` fails.
void PrintTo(const RTCCertificateStats& stats, ::std::ostream* os) {
*os << stats.ToJson();
}
@ -916,7 +916,7 @@ TEST_F(RTCStatsCollectorTest, MultipleCallbacks) {
}
TEST_F(RTCStatsCollectorTest, CachedStatsReports) {
// Caching should ensure |a| and |b| are the same report.
// Caching should ensure `a` and `b` are the same report.
rtc::scoped_refptr<const RTCStatsReport> a = stats_->GetStatsReport();
rtc::scoped_refptr<const RTCStatsReport> b = stats_->GetStatsReport();
EXPECT_EQ(a.get(), b.get());
@ -942,8 +942,8 @@ TEST_F(RTCStatsCollectorTest, MultipleCallbacksWithInvalidatedCacheInBetween) {
EXPECT_TRUE_WAIT(b, kGetStatsReportTimeoutMs);
EXPECT_TRUE_WAIT(c, kGetStatsReportTimeoutMs);
EXPECT_EQ(a.get(), b.get());
// The act of doing |AdvanceTime| processes all messages. If this was not the
// case we might not require |c| to be fresher than |b|.
// The act of doing `AdvanceTime` processes all messages. If this was not the
// case we might not require `c` to be fresher than `b`.
EXPECT_NE(c.get(), b.get());
}
@ -2807,7 +2807,7 @@ class RTCStatsCollectorTestWithParamKind
}
// Adds a sender and channel of the appropriate kind, creating a sender info
// with the report block's |source_ssrc| and report block data.
// with the report block's `source_ssrc` and report block data.
void AddSenderInfoAndMediaChannel(
std::string transport_name,
const std::vector<ReportBlockData>& report_block_datas,
@ -2881,7 +2881,7 @@ TEST_P(RTCStatsCollectorTestWithParamKind,
for (auto ssrc : ssrcs) {
RTCPReportBlock report_block;
// The remote-inbound-rtp SSRC and the outbound-rtp SSRC is the same as the
// |source_ssrc|, "SSRC of the RTP packet sender".
// `source_ssrc`, "SSRC of the RTP packet sender".
report_block.source_ssrc = ssrc;
report_block.packets_lost = 7;
report_block.fraction_lost = kFractionLost;
@ -2916,7 +2916,7 @@ TEST_P(RTCStatsCollectorTestWithParamKind,
expected_remote_inbound_rtp.total_round_trip_time =
kRoundTripTimeSample1Seconds + kRoundTripTimeSample2Seconds;
expected_remote_inbound_rtp.round_trip_time_measurements = 2;
// This test does not set up RTCCodecStats, so |codec_id| and |jitter| are
// This test does not set up RTCCodecStats, so `codec_id` and `jitter` are
// expected to be missing. These are tested separately.
ASSERT_TRUE(report->Get(expected_remote_inbound_rtp.id()));
@ -2940,7 +2940,7 @@ TEST_P(RTCStatsCollectorTestWithParamKind,
RTCPReportBlock report_block;
// The remote-inbound-rtp SSRC and the outbound-rtp SSRC is the same as the
// |source_ssrc|, "SSRC of the RTP packet sender".
// `source_ssrc`, "SSRC of the RTP packet sender".
report_block.source_ssrc = 12;
ReportBlockData report_block_data;
report_block_data.SetReportBlock(report_block, kReportBlockTimestampUtcUs);
@ -2972,7 +2972,7 @@ TEST_P(RTCStatsCollectorTestWithParamKind,
RTCPReportBlock report_block;
// The remote-inbound-rtp SSRC and the outbound-rtp SSRC is the same as the
// |source_ssrc|, "SSRC of the RTP packet sender".
// `source_ssrc`, "SSRC of the RTP packet sender".
report_block.source_ssrc = 12;
report_block.jitter = 5000;
ReportBlockData report_block_data;
@ -3009,7 +3009,7 @@ TEST_P(RTCStatsCollectorTestWithParamKind,
RTCPReportBlock report_block;
// The remote-inbound-rtp SSRC and the outbound-rtp SSRC is the same as the
// |source_ssrc|, "SSRC of the RTP packet sender".
// `source_ssrc`, "SSRC of the RTP packet sender".
report_block.source_ssrc = 12;
ReportBlockData report_block_data;
report_block_data.SetReportBlock(report_block, kReportBlockTimestampUtcUs);