Moved Opus-specific payload splitting into AudioDecoderOpus.

The biggest change to NetEq is the move from a primary flag, to a
Priority with two separate levels: one set by RED splitting and one
set by the codec itself. This allows us to unambigously prioritize
"fallback" packets from these two sources. I've chosen what I believe
is the sensible ordering: packets that the codec prioritizes are
chosen first, regardless of if they are secondary RED packets or
not. So if we were to use Opus w/ FEC in RED, we'd only do Opus FEC
decoding if there was no RED packet that could cover the time slot.

With this change, PayloadSplitter now only deals with RED
packets. Maybe it should be renamed RedPayloadSplitter?

BUG=webrtc:5805

Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2342443005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#14347}
This commit is contained in:
ossu
2016-09-22 02:06:28 -07:00
committed by Commit bot
parent 2beb42983c
commit a70695a3e1
32 changed files with 441 additions and 464 deletions

View File

@ -60,7 +60,6 @@ Packet* PacketGenerator::NextPacket(int payload_size_bytes) {
packet->header.ssrc = 0x12345678;
packet->header.numCSRCs = 0;
packet->header.paddingLength = 0;
packet->primary = true;
packet->payload.SetSize(payload_size_bytes);
++seq_no_;
ts_ += frame_size_;
@ -284,7 +283,7 @@ TEST(PacketBuffer, ExtractOrderRedundancy) {
packet_facts[i].payload_type,
kFrameSize);
Packet* packet = gen.NextPacket(kPayloadLength);
packet->primary = packet_facts[i].primary;
packet->priority.red_level = packet_facts[i].primary ? 0 : 1;
EXPECT_EQ(PacketBuffer::kOK, buffer.InsertPacket(packet));
if (packet_facts[i].extract_order >= 0) {
expect_order[packet_facts[i].extract_order] = packet;
@ -512,8 +511,8 @@ TEST(PacketBuffer, Failures) {
// The function should return true if the first packet "goes before" the second.
TEST(PacketBuffer, ComparePackets) {
PacketGenerator gen(0, 0, 0, 10);
Packet* a = gen.NextPacket(10); // SN = 0, TS = 0.
Packet* b = gen.NextPacket(10); // SN = 1, TS = 10.
std::unique_ptr<Packet> a(gen.NextPacket(10)); // SN = 0, TS = 0.
std::unique_ptr<Packet> b(gen.NextPacket(10)); // SN = 1, TS = 10.
EXPECT_FALSE(*a == *b);
EXPECT_TRUE(*a != *b);
EXPECT_TRUE(*a < *b);
@ -556,10 +555,11 @@ TEST(PacketBuffer, ComparePackets) {
EXPECT_TRUE(*a <= *b);
EXPECT_FALSE(*a >= *b);
// Test equal timestamps and sequence numbers, but only 'b' is primary.
// Test equal timestamps and sequence numbers, but differing priorities.
a->header.sequenceNumber = b->header.sequenceNumber;
a->primary = false;
b->primary = true;
a->priority = {1, 0};
b->priority = {0, 0};
// a after b
EXPECT_FALSE(*a == *b);
EXPECT_TRUE(*a != *b);
EXPECT_FALSE(*a < *b);
@ -567,8 +567,53 @@ TEST(PacketBuffer, ComparePackets) {
EXPECT_FALSE(*a <= *b);
EXPECT_TRUE(*a >= *b);
delete a;
delete b;
std::unique_ptr<Packet> c(gen.NextPacket(0)); // SN = 2, TS = 20.
std::unique_ptr<Packet> d(gen.NextPacket(0)); // SN = 3, TS = 20.
c->header.timestamp = b->header.timestamp;
d->header.timestamp = b->header.timestamp;
c->header.sequenceNumber = b->header.sequenceNumber;
d->header.sequenceNumber = b->header.sequenceNumber;
c->priority = {1, 1};
d->priority = {0, 1};
// c after d
EXPECT_FALSE(*c == *d);
EXPECT_TRUE(*c != *d);
EXPECT_FALSE(*c < *d);
EXPECT_TRUE(*c > *d);
EXPECT_FALSE(*c <= *d);
EXPECT_TRUE(*c >= *d);
// c after a
EXPECT_FALSE(*c == *a);
EXPECT_TRUE(*c != *a);
EXPECT_FALSE(*c < *a);
EXPECT_TRUE(*c > *a);
EXPECT_FALSE(*c <= *a);
EXPECT_TRUE(*c >= *a);
// c after b
EXPECT_FALSE(*c == *b);
EXPECT_TRUE(*c != *b);
EXPECT_FALSE(*c < *b);
EXPECT_TRUE(*c > *b);
EXPECT_FALSE(*c <= *b);
EXPECT_TRUE(*c >= *b);
// a after d
EXPECT_FALSE(*a == *d);
EXPECT_TRUE(*a != *d);
EXPECT_FALSE(*a < *d);
EXPECT_TRUE(*a > *d);
EXPECT_FALSE(*a <= *d);
EXPECT_TRUE(*a >= *d);
// d after b
EXPECT_FALSE(*d == *b);
EXPECT_TRUE(*d != *b);
EXPECT_FALSE(*d < *b);
EXPECT_TRUE(*d > *b);
EXPECT_FALSE(*d <= *b);
EXPECT_TRUE(*d >= *b);
}
// Test the DeleteFirstPacket DeleteAllPackets methods.