Fix: when SamplesStatsCounter is empty it's not propagated to the Histogram perf output

Bug: None
Change-Id: I5664c39ed702b8ca581d28a08900f7a7d435d6ac
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/212610
Reviewed-by: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Artem Titov <titovartem@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33512}
This commit is contained in:
Artem Titov
2021-03-20 12:27:43 +01:00
committed by Commit Bot
parent 2bab0efee4
commit eecc4f5e7c
3 changed files with 83 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -103,6 +103,83 @@ TEST_F(PerfTest, TestGetPerfResultsHistograms) {
EXPECT_EQ(hist2.unit().unit(), proto::MS_BEST_FIT_FORMAT);
}
TEST_F(PerfTest, TestGetPerfResultsHistogramsWithEmptyCounter) {
ClearPerfResults();
::testing::internal::CaptureStdout();
SamplesStatsCounter empty_counter;
PrintResult("measurement", "_modifier", "story", empty_counter, "ms", false);
proto::HistogramSet histogram_set;
EXPECT_TRUE(histogram_set.ParseFromString(GetPerfResults()))
<< "Expected valid histogram set";
ASSERT_EQ(histogram_set.histograms_size(), 1)
<< "Should be one histogram: measurement_modifier";
const proto::Histogram& hist = histogram_set.histograms(0);
EXPECT_EQ(hist.name(), "measurement_modifier");
// Spot check some things in here (there's a more thorough test on the
// histogram writer itself).
EXPECT_EQ(hist.unit().unit(), proto::MS_BEST_FIT_FORMAT);
EXPECT_EQ(hist.sample_values_size(), 1);
EXPECT_EQ(hist.sample_values(0), 0);
EXPECT_EQ(hist.diagnostics().diagnostic_map().count("stories"), 1u);
const proto::Diagnostic& stories =
hist.diagnostics().diagnostic_map().at("stories");
ASSERT_EQ(stories.generic_set().values_size(), 1);
EXPECT_EQ(stories.generic_set().values(0), "\"story\"");
std::string expected = "RESULT measurement_modifier: story= {0,0} ms\n";
EXPECT_EQ(expected, ::testing::internal::GetCapturedStdout());
}
TEST_F(PerfTest, TestGetPerfResultsHistogramsWithStatsCounter) {
ClearPerfResults();
::testing::internal::CaptureStdout();
SamplesStatsCounter counter;
counter.AddSample(1);
counter.AddSample(2);
counter.AddSample(3);
counter.AddSample(4);
counter.AddSample(5);
PrintResult("measurement", "_modifier", "story", counter, "ms", false);
proto::HistogramSet histogram_set;
EXPECT_TRUE(histogram_set.ParseFromString(GetPerfResults()))
<< "Expected valid histogram set";
ASSERT_EQ(histogram_set.histograms_size(), 1)
<< "Should be one histogram: measurement_modifier";
const proto::Histogram& hist = histogram_set.histograms(0);
EXPECT_EQ(hist.name(), "measurement_modifier");
// Spot check some things in here (there's a more thorough test on the
// histogram writer itself).
EXPECT_EQ(hist.unit().unit(), proto::MS_BEST_FIT_FORMAT);
EXPECT_EQ(hist.sample_values_size(), 5);
EXPECT_EQ(hist.sample_values(0), 1);
EXPECT_EQ(hist.sample_values(1), 2);
EXPECT_EQ(hist.sample_values(2), 3);
EXPECT_EQ(hist.sample_values(3), 4);
EXPECT_EQ(hist.sample_values(4), 5);
EXPECT_EQ(hist.diagnostics().diagnostic_map().count("stories"), 1u);
const proto::Diagnostic& stories =
hist.diagnostics().diagnostic_map().at("stories");
ASSERT_EQ(stories.generic_set().values_size(), 1);
EXPECT_EQ(stories.generic_set().values(0), "\"story\"");
// mean = 3; std = sqrt(2)
std::string expected =
"RESULT measurement_modifier: story= {3,1.4142136} ms\n";
EXPECT_EQ(expected, ::testing::internal::GetCapturedStdout());
}
#endif // WEBRTC_ENABLE_PROTOBUF
#if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST