Deallocating the async invoker is a costly operation
but it's also unnecessary and could cause us to miss signal
events.
The data_channel_transport and data_channel_transport_invoker
are (despite the name) not related, since the latter is
used to signal events on the signaling thread whereas the
former deals with the data.
Bug: webrtc:11908
Change-Id: I37b345476a6381aef5d87807877ec1e05b380137
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/184062
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32096}
Done in preparation for some threading changes that would be quite
messy if implemented with the class as-is.
This results in some code duplication, but is preferable to
one class having two completely different modes of operation.
RTP data channels are in the process of being removed anyway,
so the duplicated code won't last forever.
Bug: webrtc:9883
Change-Id: Idfd41a669b56a4bb4819572e4a264a4ffaaba9c0
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/178940
Commit-Queue: Taylor <deadbeef@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31691}
This removes code from DataChannelController that exposes
an internal vector of data channels and puts the onus of
returning stats for a data channel, on the data channel
object itself. This will come in handy as we make threading
changes to the data channel object.
Change-Id: Ie164cc5823cd5f9782fc5c9a63aa4c76b8229639
Bug: webrtc:11547, webrtc:11687
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/177244
Commit-Queue: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31533}
This CL propagates a "closed" signal from DTLS up to the
SCTP section of the data channel controller, where it causes
closing of all open datachannels.
Bug: chromium:1030631, webrtc:10360
Change-Id: I88bb9e1aff5c25f330edfd092ef609d4fcc3a9f8
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/162206
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30099}
I could find no reason for the extra complexity of doing messaging
in order to schedule a task to be done after the current cycle.
It also simplifies the peerconnection/datachannelcontroller coupling.
Bug: webrtc:11146
Change-Id: I68f45059b9f4a6869fb44b856e05a480f4652365
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/161232
Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29997}
This CL:
- Moved HasDataChannel and data_channel_type_
- Moved rtp_data_channels_
- Moved sctp_data_channels_
- Moved data_channel_controller to its own .h file
- Various changes to reduce the coupling between the classes
- Removed friendship between DataChannelController and PeerConnection
Bug: webrtc:11146
Change-Id: Ib8c395e4c90ce34baf40812d1dade0ffa79f2438
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/161094
Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Karl Wiberg <kwiberg@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29987}
