Scenario tests runs all its activities on task queues. This is not
allowed by the default event log writer, causing a DCHECK failure.
This CL makes it possible to stop the event asynchronously,
thereby avoiding the need for the DCHECK.
Bug: webrtc:10365
Change-Id: I1206982b29fd609ac85b4ce30ae9291cbec52041
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/136685
Reviewed-by: Stefan Holmer <stefan@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Björn Terelius <terelius@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Sebastian Jansson <srte@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28027}
Removing functionality to choose congestion controller implementation,
using injection instead. Also cleaning up some related functionality
that's no longer needed, such as the injection of event logs into the
factory.
Bug: webrtc:9883
Change-Id: Ia528005625430ae31a15bc88881e2d4ac6ad1d42
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/133890
Commit-Queue: Sebastian Jansson <srte@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Björn Terelius <terelius@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27768}
As part of this change, a task queue is used to handle packet
processing in real time mode. This requires that we also do
most call and media stream related operation on the same task
queue to satisfy thread checkers.
Bug: webrtc:10365
Change-Id: Icdd9d56e4ca14f2c944dc655c91e29392e3765f7
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/127544
Commit-Queue: Sebastian Jansson <srte@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Artem Titov <titovartem@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27379}
This makes it possible to save log outputs from scenario tests to
either files or memory.
Bug: webrtc:9510
Change-Id: I883bd8240ab712d31d54118adf979041bd83481a
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/116321
Commit-Queue: Sebastian Jansson <srte@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Per Kjellander <perkj@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Björn Terelius <terelius@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26284}
It is a step in the big refactoring to introduce new network emulation
layer for peer connection level e2e test, which will be based on system
sockets level injection.
Bug: webrtc:10138
Change-Id: Ie3854d22aa3eec289617bc432026ea670646556a
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/115943
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Jansson <srte@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Artem Titov <titovartem@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26137}
The return value is not used. This change prepares for future
refactoring by removing the requirement that TryDeliverPacket must be
synchronous. Also renaming to DeliverPacket as we no longer need to
indicate the meaning of the return value.
Bug: webrtc:9510
Change-Id: I78536434b198fa7bf4df88b10d6add23684767f1
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/115181
Commit-Queue: Sebastian Jansson <srte@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26066}
This makes it possible to test custom network controllers without
requiring update to test framework. Also updating BBR performance
test to use this feature.
Bug: webrtc:9510
Change-Id: I0446de0403fe9d1f6dc3710c1d114887a6c359c5
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/114640
Commit-Queue: Sebastian Jansson <srte@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Rodbro <crodbro@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26046}
This prevents printing warning messages when the extensions aren't
found. The real parsing is done deeper in the stack and is unaffected.
Bug: webrtc:9510
Change-Id: Idf09f0e69c223bd4217be7044d21d1d0bbbdab92
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/110615
Reviewed-by: Stefan Holmer <stefan@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Sebastian Jansson <srte@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#25612}
This CL makes it possible to change transport routes while running
a scenario based test.
To make this possible in a consistent manner, the scenario test
framework is modified to only allow shared transport for all streams
between two CallClients. This is what typically is done in practice and
it is quite complex to even reason about the implications of using
mixed transports for a single call.
Bug: webrtc:9718
Change-Id: Ib836928feed98aa2bbbe0295e158157a6518348b
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/107200
Commit-Queue: Sebastian Jansson <srte@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Björn Terelius <terelius@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#25287}