And redefine rtc::Buffer as
using Buffer = BufferT<uint8_t>;
(In the long run, I'd like to remove the type alias and rename the
template to just rtc::Buffer, but that requires all current users of
Buffer to start saying Buffer<uint8_t> instead, and since Buffer is
used in the API, we can't do that in one step.)
The immediate reason for the new template is that we'd like to use
BufferT<int16_t> in the AudioDecoder interface.
BUG=webrtc:5801
Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1929903002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12564}
This CL removes copy and assign support from Buffer and changes various
parameters from Buffer to CopyOnWriteBuffer so they can be passed along
and copied without actually copying the underlying data.
With this changed some parameters to be "const" and fixed an issue when
creating a CopyOnWriteBuffer with empty data.
BUG=webrtc:5155
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1823503002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12062}
Reason for revert:
I'm really sorry for having to revert this but it seems this hit an unexpected compile error downstream:
webrtc/media/sctp/sctpdataengine.cc: In function 'void cricket::VerboseLogPacket(const void*, size_t, int)':
webrtc/media/sctp/sctpdataengine.cc:172:37: error: invalid conversion from 'const void*' to 'void*' [-fpermissive]
data, length, direction)) != NULL) {
^
In file included from webrtc/media/sctp/sctpdataengine.cc:20:0:
third_party/usrsctp/usrsctplib/usrsctp.h:964:1: error: initializing argument 1 of 'char* usrsctp_dumppacket(void*, size_t, int)' [-fpermissive]
usrsctp_dumppacket(void *, size_t, int);
^
I'm sure you can fix this easily and just re-land this CL, while I'm going to look into how to add this warning at the public bots (on Monday).
Original issue's description:
> Use CopyOnWriteBuffer instead of Buffer to avoid unnecessary copies.
>
> This CL removes copy and assign support from Buffer and changes various
> parameters from Buffer to CopyOnWriteBuffer so they can be passed along
> and copied without actually copying the underlying data.
>
> With this changed some parameters to be "const" and fixed an issue when
> creating a CopyOnWriteBuffer with empty data.
>
> BUG=webrtc:5155
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/944c39006f1c52aee20919676002dac7a42b1c05
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12058}
TBR=kwiberg@webrtc.org,tkchin@webrtc.org,tommi@webrtc.org,pthatcher@webrtc.org,jbauch@webrtc.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=webrtc:5155
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1817753003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12060}
This CL removes copy and assign support from Buffer and changes various
parameters from Buffer to CopyOnWriteBuffer so they can be passed along
and copied without actually copying the underlying data.
With this changed some parameters to be "const" and fixed an issue when
creating a CopyOnWriteBuffer with empty data.
BUG=webrtc:5155
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1785713005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12058}
They are invoked with the maximum size of the data to be added, and a
callable that generates that data, like this:
buffer.AppendData(10, [] (rtc::ArrayView<uint8_t> av) {
for (uint8_t i = 0; i != 5; ++i)
av[i] = i;
return 5;
});
The callable returns the number of bytes actually written, and the
final Buffer size will be adjusted accordingly. SetData and AppendData
both return the number of bytes added (i.e. the return value of the
callable).
These versions will be useful when converting AudioEncoder::Encode to use Buffer rather than raw pointers.
Also added a few tests for the new functionality.
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1717273002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#11733}
We can now use std::move instead!
This CL leaves the Pass methods in place; a follow-up CL will add deprecation annotations to them.
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1460043002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#11064}
1. Constructors, SetData(), and AppendData() now accept uint8_t*,
int8_t*, and char*. Previously, they accepted void*, meaning that
any kind of pointer was accepted. I think requiring an explicit
cast in cases where the input array isn't already of a byte-sized
type is a better compromise between convenience and safety.
2. data() can now return a uint8_t* instead of a char*, which seems
more appropriate for a byte array, and is harder to mix up with
zero-terminated C strings. data<int8_t>() is also available so
that callers that want that type instead won't have to cast, as
is data<char>() (which remains the default until all existing
callers have been fixed).
3. Constructors, SetData(), and AppendData() now accept arrays
natively, not just decayed to pointers. The advantage of this is
that callers don't have to pass the size separately.
4. There are new constructors that allow setting size and capacity
without initializing the array. Previously, this had to be done
separately after construction.
5. Instead of TransferTo(), Buffer now supports swap(), and move
construction and assignment, and has a Pass() method that works
just like std::move(). (The Pass method is modeled after
scoped_ptr::Pass().)
R=jmarusic@webrtc.org, tommi@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/42989004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#9033}
And add a constructor for creating an uninitialized Buffer of a
specified size.
(I intend to follow up with more Buffer changes, but since it's rather
widely used, the rename is quite noisy and works better as a separate
CL.)
R=tommi@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/48579004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#8841}
git-svn-id: http://webrtc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@8841 4adac7df-926f-26a2-2b94-8c16560cd09d
Mostly this consists of marking functions with override when
applicable, and moving function bodies from .h to .cc files.
Not inlining virtual functions with simple bodies such as
{ return false; }
strikes me as probably losing more in readability than we gain in
binary size and compilation time, but I guess it's just like any other
case where enabling a generally good warning forces us to write
slightly worse code in a couple of places.
BUG=163
R=kjellander@webrtc.org, tommi@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/47429004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#8656}
git-svn-id: http://webrtc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@8656 4adac7df-926f-26a2-2b94-8c16560cd09d
