In short, the caller places a x-opaque line in SDP for each m= section that
uses datagram transport. If the answerer supports datagram transport, it will
parse this line and create a datagram transport. It will then echo the x-opaque
line into the answer (to indicate that it accepted use of datagram transport).
If the offer and answer contain exactly the same x-opaque line, both peers will
use datagram transport. If the x-opaque line is omitted from the answer (or is
different in the answer) they will fall back to RTP.
Note that a different x-opaque line in the answer means the answerer did not
understand something in the negotiation proto. Since WebRTC cannot know what
was misunderstood, or whether it's still possible to use the datagram transport,
it must fall back to RTP. This may change in the future, possibly by passing
the answer to the datagram transport, but it's good enough for now.
Negotiation consists of four parts:
1. DatagramTransport exposes transport parameters for both client and server
perspectives. The client just echoes what it received from the server (modulo
any fields it might not have understood).
2. SDP adds a x-opaque line for opaque transport parameters. Identical to
x-mt, but this is specific to datagram transport and goes in each m= section,
and appears in the answer as well as the offer.
- This is propagated to Jsep as part of the TransportDescription.
- SDP files: transport_description.h,cc, transport_description_factory.h,cc,
media_session.cc, webrtc_sdp.cc
3. JsepTransport/Controller:
- Exposes opaque parameters for each mid (m= section). On offerer, this means
pre-allocating a datagram transport and getting its parameters. On the
answerer, this means echoing the offerer's parameters.
- Uses a composite RTP transport to receive from either default RTP or
datagram transport until both offer and answer arrive.
- If a provisional answer arrives, sets the composite to send on the
provisionally selected transport.
- Once both offer and answer are set, deletes the unneeded transports and
keeps whichever transport is selected.
4. PeerConnection pulls transport parameters out of Jsep and adds them to SDP.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: Ifcc428c8d76fb77dcc8abaa79507c620bcfb31b9
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/140920
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28198}
This reverts commit 71c6482baf0ff17141c635e6a7639493db68a65c.
Reason for revert: Lands too much at once and breaks downstream tests that need to implement new interfaces first.
Original change's description:
> Implement true negotiation for DatagramTransport with fallback to RTP.
>
> In short, the caller places a x-opaque line in SDP for each m= section that
> uses datagram transport. If the answerer supports datagram transport, it will
> parse this line and create a datagram transport. It will then echo the x-opaque
> line into the answer (to indicate that it accepted use of datagram transport).
>
> If the offer and answer contain exactly the same x-opaque line, both peers will
> use datagram transport. If the x-opaque line is omitted from the answer (or is
> different in the answer) they will fall back to RTP.
>
> Note that a different x-opaque line in the answer means the answerer did not
> understand something in the negotiation proto. Since WebRTC cannot know what
> was misunderstood, or whether it's still possible to use the datagram transport,
> it must fall back to RTP. This may change in the future, possibly by passing
> the answer to the datagram transport, but it's good enough for now.
>
> Negotiation consists of four parts:
> 1. DatagramTransport exposes transport parameters for both client and server
> perspectives. The client just echoes what it received from the server (modulo
> any fields it might not have understood).
>
> 2. SDP adds a x-opaque line for opaque transport parameters. Identical to
> x-mt, but this is specific to datagram transport and goes in each m= section,
> and appears in the answer as well as the offer.
> - This is propagated to Jsep as part of the TransportDescription.
> - SDP files: transport_description.h,cc, transport_description_factory.h,cc,
> media_session.cc, webrtc_sdp.cc
>
> 3. JsepTransport/Controller:
> - Exposes opaque parameters for each mid (m= section). On offerer, this means
> pre-allocating a datagram transport and getting its parameters. On the
> answerer, this means echoing the offerer's parameters.
> - Uses a composite RTP transport to receive from either default RTP or
> datagram transport until both offer and answer arrive.
> - If a provisional answer arrives, sets the composite to send on the
> provisionally selected transport.
> - Once both offer and answer are set, deletes the unneeded transports and
> keeps whichever transport is selected.
>
> 4. PeerConnection pulls transport parameters out of Jsep and adds them to SDP.
>
> Bug: webrtc:9719
> Change-Id: Id8996eb1871e79d93b7923a5d7eb3431548c798d
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/140700
> Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Anton Sukhanov <sukhanov@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28182}
TBR=steveanton@webrtc.org,mellem@webrtc.org,sukhanov@webrtc.org
Change-Id: I0d502c4a6d27516c35ed85154f3fa5869f88b3b7
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: webrtc:9719
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/140822
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28188}
In short, the caller places a x-opaque line in SDP for each m= section that
uses datagram transport. If the answerer supports datagram transport, it will
parse this line and create a datagram transport. It will then echo the x-opaque
line into the answer (to indicate that it accepted use of datagram transport).
If the offer and answer contain exactly the same x-opaque line, both peers will
use datagram transport. If the x-opaque line is omitted from the answer (or is
different in the answer) they will fall back to RTP.
Note that a different x-opaque line in the answer means the answerer did not
understand something in the negotiation proto. Since WebRTC cannot know what
was misunderstood, or whether it's still possible to use the datagram transport,
it must fall back to RTP. This may change in the future, possibly by passing
the answer to the datagram transport, but it's good enough for now.
Negotiation consists of four parts:
1. DatagramTransport exposes transport parameters for both client and server
perspectives. The client just echoes what it received from the server (modulo
any fields it might not have understood).
2. SDP adds a x-opaque line for opaque transport parameters. Identical to
x-mt, but this is specific to datagram transport and goes in each m= section,
and appears in the answer as well as the offer.
- This is propagated to Jsep as part of the TransportDescription.
- SDP files: transport_description.h,cc, transport_description_factory.h,cc,
media_session.cc, webrtc_sdp.cc
3. JsepTransport/Controller:
- Exposes opaque parameters for each mid (m= section). On offerer, this means
pre-allocating a datagram transport and getting its parameters. On the
answerer, this means echoing the offerer's parameters.
- Uses a composite RTP transport to receive from either default RTP or
datagram transport until both offer and answer arrive.
- If a provisional answer arrives, sets the composite to send on the
provisionally selected transport.
- Once both offer and answer are set, deletes the unneeded transports and
keeps whichever transport is selected.
4. PeerConnection pulls transport parameters out of Jsep and adds them to SDP.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: Id8996eb1871e79d93b7923a5d7eb3431548c798d
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/140700
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Anton Sukhanov <sukhanov@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28182}
Raw RTP packetization is done using the existing RtpPacketizerGeneric
without adding the generic payload header. It is intended to be used
together with generic frame descriptor RTP header extension.
Bug: webrtc:10625
Change-Id: I2e3d0a766e4933ddc4ad4abc1449b9b91ba6cd35
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/138061
Commit-Queue: Mirta Dvornicic <mirtad@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Magnus Jedvert <magjed@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Karl Wiberg <kwiberg@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Rasmus Brandt <brandtr@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28154}
This documents in the API what is already true in the
implementation - that SessionDescription will eventually
delete MediaDescription objects passed to it.
The old API is preserved for backwards compatibility, but
marked as RTC_DEPRECATED.
Bug: webrtc:10701
Change-Id: I9a822b20cf3e58c5945fa51dbf6082960a332de8
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/139880
Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28144}
- Implement datagram transport adaptor, which wraps datagram transport in DtlsTransportInternal. Datagram adaptor owns both ICE and Datagram Transports.
- Implement setup of datagram transport based on RTCConfiguration flag use_datagram_transport. This is very similar to MediaTransport setup with the exception that we create DTLS datagram adaptor.
- Propagate maximum datagram size to video encoder via MediaTransportConfig.
TODO: Currently this CL can only be tested in downstream projects. Once we add fake datagram transport, we will be able to implement unit tests similar to loopback media transport.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: I4fa4a5725598dfee5da4f0f374269a7e289d48ed
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/138100
Commit-Queue: Anton Sukhanov <sukhanov@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28047}
Prior to this CL, only the mline index of an ice candidate was used to
look up contents. However, due to recent changes, it is possible that
no mline index is specified, but that only a mid is specified.
No mline index is indicated with a -1 value.
This CL makes sure the mid is used if no mline index is given.
Bug: chromium:965483
Change-Id: I8962e71acb386f7b50349802f27358ba24c11921
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/138075
Commit-Queue: Guido Urdaneta <guidou@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28045}
Currently we pass media_transport from PeerConnection to media layers. The goal of this change is to replace media_transport with struct MediaTransportCondif, which will enable adding different transports (i.e. we plan to add DatagramTransport) as well as other media-transport related settings without changing 100s of files.
TODO: In the future we should consider also adding rtp_transport in the same config, but it will require a bit more work, so I did not include it in the same change.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: Ie31e1faa3ed9e6beefe30a3da208130509ce00cd
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/137181
Commit-Queue: Anton Sukhanov <sukhanov@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Holmer <stefan@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Fredrik Solenberg <solenberg@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28016}
This is a reland of df5731e44d510e9f23a35b77e9e102eb41919bf4 with fixes
to avoid existing chromium tests to fail.
Instead of replacing the existing RtpSender::set_stream_ids() to
also fire OnRenegotiationNeeded(), this CL keeps the old
set_stream_ids() and adds the new RtpSender::SetStreams() which sets
the stream IDs and fires the callback.
This allows existing callsites to maintain behavior, and reserve
SetStreams() for the cases when we want OnRenegotiationNeeded() to fire.
Using the SetStreams() name instead of SetStreamIDs() to match the W3C
spec and to make it more different that the existing set_stream_ids().
Original change's description:
> Improve spec compliance of SetStreamIDs in RtpSenderInterface
>
> This CL makes RtpSender::SetStreamIDs fire fire negotiationneeded
> event if needed and exposes the method on RtpSenderInterface.
>
> This is a spec-compliance change.
>
> Bug: webrtc:10129
> Change-Id: I2b98b92665c847102838b094516a79b24de0e47e
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/135121
> Commit-Queue: Guido Urdaneta <guidou@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27974}
Bug: webrtc:10129
Change-Id: Ic0b322bfa25c157e3a39465ef8b486f898eaf6bd
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/137439
Commit-Queue: Guido Urdaneta <guidou@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27992}
This CL makes RtpSender::SetStreamIDs fire fire negotiationneeded
event if needed and exposes the method on RtpSenderInterface.
This is a spec-compliance change.
Bug: webrtc:10129
Change-Id: I2b98b92665c847102838b094516a79b24de0e47e
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/135121
Commit-Queue: Guido Urdaneta <guidou@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27974}
This also refactors some of the code in peerconnection for
handling SCTP transports to be internal to the webrtc::SctpTransport
class, rather than being in peerconnection.
Bug: webrtc:10358, webrtc:10629
Change-Id: I15ecf95c199f56b08909e5a9311d446a412ed162
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/137041
Reviewed-by: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27960}
This also changes the default when no max-message-size is set
to the protocol defined value of 64K, and prevents messages
from being sent when they are too large to send.
Bug: webrtc:10358
Change-Id: Iacc1dd774d1554d9f27315378fbea6351300b5cc
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/135948
Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27945}
This also introduces an option in CreateOfferOptions for
getting the non-spec behavior (2013 vintage) back.
Bug: chromium:962860
Change-Id: I72267408a61d6eb03e9895fe38b4cc803d8cbbaf
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/136809
Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27941}
This reverts commit 46afbf9481fbcc939c998c898ca1031ce41cc6b1.
Reason for revert: Tightened protocol name handling.
Original change's description:
> Revert "Reland "Version 2 "Refactoring DataContentDescription class"""
>
> This reverts commit 37f2b43274a0d718de53a4cfcf02226356edcf6e.
>
> Reason for revert: fuzzer failures
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland "Version 2 "Refactoring DataContentDescription class""
> >
> > This is a reland of 14b2758726879d21671a21291dfed8fb4fd5c21c
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > Version 2 "Refactoring DataContentDescription class"
> > >
> > > (substantial changes since version 1)
> > >
> > > This CL splits the cricket::DataContentDescription class into
> > > two classes: cricket::RtpDataContentDescription (used for RTP data)
> > > and cricket::SctpDataContentDescription (used for SCTP only).
> > >
> > > SctpDataContentDescription no longer inherits from
> > > MediaContentDescriptionImpl, and no longer contains "codecs".
> > >
> > > Due to usage of internal interfaces by consumers, shimming the old
> > > DataContentDescription API is needed.
> > >
> > > A new cricket::DataContentDescription class is defined, which is
> > > a shim over RtpDataContentDescription and SctpDataContentDescription.
> > > It exposes as little functionality as possible, but supports the
> > > concerned consumer's usage
> > >
> > > Design document:
> > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1H5LfQxJA2ikMWTQ8FZ3_GAmaXM7knfVQWiSz6ph8VQ0/edit#
> > >
> > > Version 1 reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/132700
> > >
Bug: webrtc:10358
Change-Id: Ia9fb8f4679e082e3d18fbbb6b03fc13a08e06110
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/136581
Reviewed-by: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27933}
This reverts commit 37f2b43274a0d718de53a4cfcf02226356edcf6e.
Reason for revert: fuzzer failures
Original change's description:
> Reland "Version 2 "Refactoring DataContentDescription class""
>
> This is a reland of 14b2758726879d21671a21291dfed8fb4fd5c21c
>
> Original change's description:
> > Version 2 "Refactoring DataContentDescription class"
> >
> > (substantial changes since version 1)
> >
> > This CL splits the cricket::DataContentDescription class into
> > two classes: cricket::RtpDataContentDescription (used for RTP data)
> > and cricket::SctpDataContentDescription (used for SCTP only).
> >
> > SctpDataContentDescription no longer inherits from
> > MediaContentDescriptionImpl, and no longer contains "codecs".
> >
> > Due to usage of internal interfaces by consumers, shimming the old
> > DataContentDescription API is needed.
> >
> > A new cricket::DataContentDescription class is defined, which is
> > a shim over RtpDataContentDescription and SctpDataContentDescription.
> > It exposes as little functionality as possible, but supports the
> > concerned consumer's usage
> >
> > Design document:
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1H5LfQxJA2ikMWTQ8FZ3_GAmaXM7knfVQWiSz6ph8VQ0/edit#
> >
> > Version 1 reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/132700
> >
> > Bug: webrtc:10358
> > Change-Id: Icf95fb7308244d6f2ebfdb403aaffc544e358580
> > Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/133900
> > Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27853}
>
> Bug: webrtc:10358
> Change-Id: Iff45c4694167f0b31b34ff2167c1f4ffa650bcc4
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/135281
> Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
> Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27896}
TBR=steveanton@webrtc.org,kwiberg@webrtc.org,hbos@webrtc.org,hta@webrtc.org,shampson@webrtc.org
Change-Id: Ied6d9fb96aafe9c957f2658b34b5331b1f359b26
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: webrtc:10358
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/135986
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27917}
This is a reland of 14b2758726879d21671a21291dfed8fb4fd5c21c
Original change's description:
> Version 2 "Refactoring DataContentDescription class"
>
> (substantial changes since version 1)
>
> This CL splits the cricket::DataContentDescription class into
> two classes: cricket::RtpDataContentDescription (used for RTP data)
> and cricket::SctpDataContentDescription (used for SCTP only).
>
> SctpDataContentDescription no longer inherits from
> MediaContentDescriptionImpl, and no longer contains "codecs".
>
> Due to usage of internal interfaces by consumers, shimming the old
> DataContentDescription API is needed.
>
> A new cricket::DataContentDescription class is defined, which is
> a shim over RtpDataContentDescription and SctpDataContentDescription.
> It exposes as little functionality as possible, but supports the
> concerned consumer's usage
>
> Design document:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1H5LfQxJA2ikMWTQ8FZ3_GAmaXM7knfVQWiSz6ph8VQ0/edit#
>
> Version 1 reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/132700
>
> Bug: webrtc:10358
> Change-Id: Icf95fb7308244d6f2ebfdb403aaffc544e358580
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/133900
> Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27853}
Bug: webrtc:10358
Change-Id: Iff45c4694167f0b31b34ff2167c1f4ffa650bcc4
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/135281
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27896}
This reverts commit 14b2758726879d21671a21291dfed8fb4fd5c21c.
Reason for revert: Internal import failed.
Original change's description:
> Version 2 "Refactoring DataContentDescription class"
>
> (substantial changes since version 1)
>
> This CL splits the cricket::DataContentDescription class into
> two classes: cricket::RtpDataContentDescription (used for RTP data)
> and cricket::SctpDataContentDescription (used for SCTP only).
>
> SctpDataContentDescription no longer inherits from
> MediaContentDescriptionImpl, and no longer contains "codecs".
>
> Due to usage of internal interfaces by consumers, shimming the old
> DataContentDescription API is needed.
>
> A new cricket::DataContentDescription class is defined, which is
> a shim over RtpDataContentDescription and SctpDataContentDescription.
> It exposes as little functionality as possible, but supports the
> concerned consumer's usage
>
> Design document:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1H5LfQxJA2ikMWTQ8FZ3_GAmaXM7knfVQWiSz6ph8VQ0/edit#
>
> Version 1 reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/132700
>
> Bug: webrtc:10358
> Change-Id: Icf95fb7308244d6f2ebfdb403aaffc544e358580
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/133900
> Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27853}
TBR=danilchap@webrtc.org,steveanton@webrtc.org,kwiberg@webrtc.org,hbos@webrtc.org,hta@webrtc.org,shampson@webrtc.org
Change-Id: Ibc16ba14c1cbf50345a9b79151b79df140482539
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: webrtc:10358
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/135280
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27855}
(substantial changes since version 1)
This CL splits the cricket::DataContentDescription class into
two classes: cricket::RtpDataContentDescription (used for RTP data)
and cricket::SctpDataContentDescription (used for SCTP only).
SctpDataContentDescription no longer inherits from
MediaContentDescriptionImpl, and no longer contains "codecs".
Due to usage of internal interfaces by consumers, shimming the old
DataContentDescription API is needed.
A new cricket::DataContentDescription class is defined, which is
a shim over RtpDataContentDescription and SctpDataContentDescription.
It exposes as little functionality as possible, but supports the
concerned consumer's usage
Design document:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1H5LfQxJA2ikMWTQ8FZ3_GAmaXM7knfVQWiSz6ph8VQ0/edit#
Version 1 reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/132700
Bug: webrtc:10358
Change-Id: Icf95fb7308244d6f2ebfdb403aaffc544e358580
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/133900
Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27853}
Adding additional usage bits to the UsagePattern to:
- Track whether a mDNS candidate was collected
- Track whether a mDNS candidate was received from the remote peer
- Track whether a private IP address was received from the remote peer
The definition of a private IP address is extended to include 100.64/10 addresses.
Bug: None
Change-Id: I77182685120413d5c13c5f67e480d33fdcaefc6a
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/134000
Commit-Queue: Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Qingsi Wang <qingsi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27747}
This is a reland of cd8d1cf68e4eeed71fba51c97006a91bfd41813d
Original change's description:
> Surface ICE candidates that match an updated candidate filter.
>
> After this change an ICE agent can surface candidates that do not match
> the previous filter but are allowed by the updated one. The candidate
> filter, as part of the internal implementation in the ICE transport,
> manifests the RTCIceTransportPolicy field in RTCConfiguration.
>
> This new feature would allow an ICE agent to gather new candidates when
> the transport policy changes from e.g. 'relay' to 'all' without an ICE
> restart.
>
> A caveat in the current implementation remains, and a candidate can
> surface multiple times if the transport policy, or the candidate filter
> directly, performs multiple transitions from a value that disallows to
> one that allows the underlying candidate type. For example, if the
> transport policy is updated by 'all' -> 'relay' -> 'all', the same host
> candidate can surface after the second update.
>
>
> Bug: webrtc:8939
> Change-Id: I92c2e07dafab225c702c5de28f47958a0d3270cc
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/132282
> Commit-Queue: Qingsi Wang <qingsi@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Seth Hampson <shampson@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27674}
Bug: webrtc:8939
Change-Id: I9c32b1ea05028ecd937ab4912779dd958faf734f
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/133582
Reviewed-by: Seth Hampson <shampson@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Qingsi Wang <qingsi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27694}
This reverts commit cd8d1cf68e4eeed71fba51c97006a91bfd41813d.
Reason for revert: breaks an internal project
Original change's description:
> Surface ICE candidates that match an updated candidate filter.
>
> After this change an ICE agent can surface candidates that do not match
> the previous filter but are allowed by the updated one. The candidate
> filter, as part of the internal implementation in the ICE transport,
> manifests the RTCIceTransportPolicy field in RTCConfiguration.
>
> This new feature would allow an ICE agent to gather new candidates when
> the transport policy changes from e.g. 'relay' to 'all' without an ICE
> restart.
>
> A caveat in the current implementation remains, and a candidate can
> surface multiple times if the transport policy, or the candidate filter
> directly, performs multiple transitions from a value that disallows to
> one that allows the underlying candidate type. For example, if the
> transport policy is updated by 'all' -> 'relay' -> 'all', the same host
> candidate can surface after the second update.
>
>
> Bug: webrtc:8939
> Change-Id: I92c2e07dafab225c702c5de28f47958a0d3270cc
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/132282
> Commit-Queue: Qingsi Wang <qingsi@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Seth Hampson <shampson@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27674}
TBR=shampson@webrtc.org,qingsi@webrtc.org,jeroendb@webrtc.org,sukhanov@webrtc.org
Change-Id: Idd51a640e55a612b42fe8b69e05dff57a22d021a
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: webrtc:8939
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/133581
Reviewed-by: Qingsi Wang <qingsi@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Qingsi Wang <qingsi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27677}
After this change an ICE agent can surface candidates that do not match
the previous filter but are allowed by the updated one. The candidate
filter, as part of the internal implementation in the ICE transport,
manifests the RTCIceTransportPolicy field in RTCConfiguration.
This new feature would allow an ICE agent to gather new candidates when
the transport policy changes from e.g. 'relay' to 'all' without an ICE
restart.
A caveat in the current implementation remains, and a candidate can
surface multiple times if the transport policy, or the candidate filter
directly, performs multiple transitions from a value that disallows to
one that allows the underlying candidate type. For example, if the
transport policy is updated by 'all' -> 'relay' -> 'all', the same host
candidate can surface after the second update.
Bug: webrtc:8939
Change-Id: I92c2e07dafab225c702c5de28f47958a0d3270cc
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/132282
Commit-Queue: Qingsi Wang <qingsi@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Seth Hampson <shampson@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27674}
This patch makes VideoBitrateAllocatorFactory injectable
by adding to PeerConnectionDependencies instead of allowing it to be
overridden using MediaEngine (on PeerConnectionFactory).
With this patch VideoBitrateAllocatorFactory is owned
by the PeerConnection.
WANT_LGTM (examples) : sakal@
WANT_LGTM (api/pc) : steveanton@
Bug: webrtc:10547
Change-Id: I768d400a621f2b7a98795eb7f410adb48651bfd6
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/132706
Commit-Queue: Jonas Oreland <jonaso@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Sami Kalliomäki <sakal@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Rasmus Brandt <brandtr@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27654}
The new processing applies only in Unified Plan mode.
Plan B retains the old-style processing.
This is a reland of 1fa06041bcd8a0119e557d16e7b54a9110c5ad03
Original change's description:
> Make negotiationneeded processing in PeerConnection spec compliant.
>
> This CL fixes the problem of misfired negotiationneeded notifications due
> to the lack of a NegotiationNeeded slot and the proper procedure to
> update it.
>
>
> Change-Id: Ie273c691f11316c9846606446f6cf838226b5d5c
> Bug: chromium:740501
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/131283
> Commit-Queue: Guido Urdaneta <guidou@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Magnus Jedvert <magjed@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27594}
Bug: chromium:740501
Change-Id: I048ae81b2b00086f6d669e94eecf426f0db0ec08
TBR: steveanton@webrtc.org
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/133162
Commit-Queue: Guido Urdaneta <guidou@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27640}
This reverts commit 1fa06041bcd8a0119e557d16e7b54a9110c5ad03.
Reason for revert: Likely cause for breaking downstream projects
Original change's description:
> Make negotiationneeded processing in PeerConnection spec compliant.
>
> This CL fixes the problem of misfired negotiationneeded notifications due
> to the lack of a NegotiationNeeded slot and the proper procedure to
> update it.
>
>
> Change-Id: Ie273c691f11316c9846606446f6cf838226b5d5c
> Bug: chromium:740501
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/131283
> Commit-Queue: Guido Urdaneta <guidou@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Magnus Jedvert <magjed@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27594}
TBR=steveanton@webrtc.org,magjed@webrtc.org,sakal@webrtc.org,hbos@webrtc.org,guidou@webrtc.org
Change-Id: Iad7b7d4e37227fa6a76ff830160ca3da9dbe4719
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: chromium:740501
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/132761
Reviewed-by: Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27599}
This CL fixes the problem of misfired negotiationneeded notifications due
to the lack of a NegotiationNeeded slot and the proper procedure to
update it.
Change-Id: Ie273c691f11316c9846606446f6cf838226b5d5c
Bug: chromium:740501
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/131283
Commit-Queue: Guido Urdaneta <guidou@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Magnus Jedvert <magjed@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27594}
This is a reland of 07f3279a730980583403b78c3762c5d246d1d9be
Original change's description:
> Adding a restriction for legal RID values.
>
> According to the spec, RID values should be constrained to only
> alpha-numeric values. This was not enforced in our implementation to
> allow for more flexibility.
> It has been brought to our attention that some values that we currently
> consider legal (such as the '~', '=' ';' characters) might cause confusion
> with the simulcast syntax that uses these characters to indicate other
> meanings.
> What's worse, is that some characters, when used in RIDs (such as
> \u{1f937} \u{1f4a9} and \u{1f926}) cause uncontrollable laughter for some
> users which might also be a health hazard.
> This change resolves these issues by restricting RIDs to alpha-numeric.
>
> Bug: webrtc:10491
> Change-Id: I16e262c87525d0289764beacd098e1525a355463
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/132061
> Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
> Commit-Queue: Amit Hilbuch <amithi@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27499}
TBR=steveanton@webrtc.org
Bug: webrtc:10491
Change-Id: I856581306a9258480ee9184f12b55c2a23dd8636
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/131983
Commit-Queue: Amit Hilbuch <amithi@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Amit Hilbuch <amithi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27530}
This reverts commit 07f3279a730980583403b78c3762c5d246d1d9be.
Reason for revert: Suspect of producing consistent failure in some Chrome trybots, blocking rolls.
Failed test:
external/wpt/webrtc/RTCPeerConnection-addTransceiver.https.html
First failure:
https://ci.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/try/linux-rel/64597
Original change's description:
> Adding a restriction for legal RID values.
>
> According to the spec, RID values should be constrained to only
> alpha-numeric values. This was not enforced in our implementation to
> allow for more flexibility.
> It has been brought to our attention that some values that we currently
> consider legal (such as the '~', '=' ';' characters) might cause confusion
> with the simulcast syntax that uses these characters to indicate other
> meanings.
> What's worse, is that some characters, when used in RIDs (such as
> \u{1f937} \u{1f4a9} and \u{1f926}) cause uncontrollable laughter for some
> users which might also be a health hazard.
> This change resolves these issues by restricting RIDs to alpha-numeric.
>
> Bug: webrtc:10491
> Change-Id: I16e262c87525d0289764beacd098e1525a355463
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/132061
> Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
> Commit-Queue: Amit Hilbuch <amithi@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27499}
TBR=steveanton@webrtc.org,amithi@webrtc.org
Change-Id: I89f9d8a8d3fa82de8a7d429f11ad7cc30812ba7c
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: webrtc:10491
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/132244
Reviewed-by: Guido Urdaneta <guidou@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Guido Urdaneta <guidou@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27525}
According to the spec, RID values should be constrained to only
alpha-numeric values. This was not enforced in our implementation to
allow for more flexibility.
It has been brought to our attention that some values that we currently
consider legal (such as the '~', '=' ';' characters) might cause confusion
with the simulcast syntax that uses these characters to indicate other
meanings.
What's worse, is that some characters, when used in RIDs (such as
\u{1f937} \u{1f4a9} and \u{1f926}) cause uncontrollable laughter for some
users which might also be a health hazard.
This change resolves these issues by restricting RIDs to alpha-numeric.
Bug: webrtc:10491
Change-Id: I16e262c87525d0289764beacd098e1525a355463
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/132061
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Amit Hilbuch <amithi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27499}
Plus all the annotations that were necessary to make things compile
again. I also had to send copies of some values owned by the signal
thread to the network thread, instead of letting the latter read them
itself.
Bug: webrtc:9987
Change-Id: Ic4b38696245584bab44956e60ac63753146e3ff4
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/131020
Commit-Queue: Karl Wiberg <kwiberg@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27437}
Previously, legacy GetStats would look up the track ID by querying the
local/remote SDP by SSRC. This doesn't work with Unified Plan since the
RtpSender/RtpReceiver track IDs may not correspond to the track ID
stored in the SDP.
This CL changes legacy GetStats to pull the track ID directly from the
RtpSenders and RtpReceivers as it generates the stats. This has a few
additional benefits:
1) Unsignaled receive SSRC stats should now get correctly matched to
the unsigneled RtpReceiver track ID for both Plan B and Unified
Plan.
2) Removes a couple methods on PeerConnection that were only used by
the legacy StatsCollector.
3) Keeps the SSRC -> track ID mapping more localized which should make
the code easier to understand.
Bug: chromium:943493
Change-Id: I43ecde8c3a3d1c5f9c749ba6c8dfb11e8c4950fd
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/129782
Commit-Queue: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Amit Hilbuch <amithi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27324}