Modify bitrate controller to update bitrate based on process call and not
only whenever a RTCP receiver block is received.
Additionally:
Add condition to only start rampup after a receiver block is received. This was same as old behaviour but now an explicit check is needed to verify process does not ramps up before the first block.
Fix logic around capping max bitrate increase at 8% per second. Before it was only increasing once every 1 second and each increase would be as high as 8%. If receiver blocks had a different interval before it would lose an update or waste an update slot and not ramp up as much as a 8% (e.g. if RTCP received < 1 second).
Did not touch decrease logic, however since it can be triggered more often it
may decrease much faster and closer to the original written cap of once every
300ms + rtt.
Note:
rampup_tests.cc don't seem to be affected by this since there is no packet loss or REMB that go higher than expected cap.
bitrate_controller_unittests.cc are don't really simulate a clock and the process thread, but trigger update by inserting an rtcp block.
BUG=3065
R=stefan@webrtc.org, mflodman@webrtc.org
git-svn-id: http://webrtc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@5794 4adac7df-926f-26a2-2b94-8c16560cd09d
This triggered an occasional TSAN failure in
CallTest.ReceivesPliAndRecoversWithNack e.g.:
http://build.chromium.org/p/client.webrtc/builders/Linux%20Tsan/builds/1444/steps/memory%20test%3A%20video_engine_tests/logs/stdio
I managed to reproduce this locally and verified that reverting this CL
corrected it.
> Modify bitrate controller to update bitrate based on process call and not
> only whenever a RTCP receiver block is received.
>
> Additionally:
> Add condition to only start rampup after a receiver block is received. This was same as old behaviour but now an explicit check is needed to verify process does not ramps up before the first block.
>
> Fix logic around capping max bitrate increase at 8% per second. Before it was only increasing once every 1 second and each increase would be as high as 8%. If receiver blocks had a different interval before it would lose an update or waste an update slot and not ramp up as much as a 8% (e.g. if RTCP received < 1 second).
>
> Did not touch decrease logic, however since it can be triggered more often it
> may decrease much faster and closer to the original written cap of once every
> 300ms + rtt.
>
> Note:
> rampup_tests.cc don't seem to be affected by this since there is no packet loss or REMB that go higher than expected cap.
> bitrate_controller_unittests.cc are don't really simulate a clock and the process thread, but trigger update by inserting an rtcp block.
>
> BUG=3065
> R=stefan@webrtc.org, mflodman@webrtc.org
>
> Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/10529004TBR=andresp@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/10079005
git-svn-id: http://webrtc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@5785 4adac7df-926f-26a2-2b94-8c16560cd09d
only whenever a RTCP receiver block is received.
Additionally:
Add condition to only start rampup after a receiver block is received. This was same as old behaviour but now an explicit check is needed to verify process does not ramps up before the first block.
Fix logic around capping max bitrate increase at 8% per second. Before it was only increasing once every 1 second and each increase would be as high as 8%. If receiver blocks had a different interval before it would lose an update or waste an update slot and not ramp up as much as a 8% (e.g. if RTCP received < 1 second).
Did not touch decrease logic, however since it can be triggered more often it
may decrease much faster and closer to the original written cap of once every
300ms + rtt.
Note:
rampup_tests.cc don't seem to be affected by this since there is no packet loss or REMB that go higher than expected cap.
bitrate_controller_unittests.cc are don't really simulate a clock and the process thread, but trigger update by inserting an rtcp block.
BUG=3065
R=stefan@webrtc.org, mflodman@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/10529004
git-svn-id: http://webrtc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@5775 4adac7df-926f-26a2-2b94-8c16560cd09d
- Move condition of 0 bps as max meaning 1gbps from SendSideBandwidthEstimation to BitrateController.
- Remove condition on bitrate=0 meaning bandwidth estimation off as that could only happen when no observers existed
and in which case the estimation would be ignored.
- Add MaybeTriggerOnNetworkChanged which only runs rate allocation if any of the dependent variables has changed
thus allowing to remove many of the bool returns that try to indicate if the estimation has changed which would not
be aware if the observers have changed.
- SendSideBandwidthEstimation now has a UpdateBitrate and has clear code paths to which calls update bitrate.
- Changes in enforce_min_bitrate so the 10kbps min is set from the BitrateController and not from the outside this keep valid as observers are changed.
R=henrik.lundin@webrtc.org, stefan@webrtc.org
BUG=3065
Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/10189004
git-svn-id: http://webrtc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@5752 4adac7df-926f-26a2-2b94-8c16560cd09d
This CL implements an alternative to the bitrate clamping that is done
in BitrateControllerImpl. The default behavior is unchanged, but if
the new algorithm is enabled the behavior is as follows:
When the new bitrate is lower than the sum of min bitrates, the
algorithm will give each observer up to its min bitrate, one
observer at a time, until the bitrate budget is depleted. Thus,
with this change, some observers may get less than their min bitrate,
or even zero.
Unit tests are implemented.
Also fixing two old lint warnings in the affected files.
This change is related to the auto-muter feature.
BUG=2436
R=stefan@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/2439005
git-svn-id: http://webrtc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@5007 4adac7df-926f-26a2-2b94-8c16560cd09d
