Mostly this consists of marking functions with override when
applicable, and moving function bodies from .h to .cc files.
Not inlining virtual functions with simple bodies such as
{ return false; }
strikes me as probably losing more in readability than we gain in
binary size and compilation time, but I guess it's just like any other
case where enabling a generally good warning forces us to write
slightly worse code in a couple of places.
BUG=163
R=kjellander@webrtc.org, tommi@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/47429004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#8656}
git-svn-id: http://webrtc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@8656 4adac7df-926f-26a2-2b94-8c16560cd09d
I'm reverting the patch due to compilation issues. It would be great if we could make sure Chromium is ready for the patch before we land it in WebRTC.
As is, we're trying to roll webrtc into Chromium and we can't (this is not the only reason though). I might reland this after the roll, depending on how that goes though.
Here's an example failure:
e:\b\build\slave\win_gn\build\src\jingle\glue\channel_socket_adapter_unittest.cc(77) : error C2259: 'jingle_glue::MockTransportChannel' : cannot instantiate abstract class
due to following members:
'bool cricket::TransportChannel::GetSslCipher(std::string *)' : is abstract
e:\b\build\slave\win_gn\build\src\third_party\webrtc\p2p\base\transportchannel.h(107) : see declaration of 'cricket::TransportChannel::GetSslCipher'
ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
> This CL adds an API to the SSL stream adapters and transport channels to get the SSL cipher that was negotiated with the remote peer.
>
> BUG=3976
> R=davidben@chromium.org, juberti@webrtc.org, pthatcher@webrtc.org
>
> Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/26009004TBR=pthatcher@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/40689004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#8282}
git-svn-id: http://webrtc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@8282 4adac7df-926f-26a2-2b94-8c16560cd09d
