To allow end-to-end QuicDataChannel usage with a
PeerConnection, RTCConfiguration has been modified to
include a boolean for whether to do QUIC, since negotiation of
QUIC is not implemented. If one peer does QUIC, then it will be
assumed that the other peer must do QUIC or the connection
will fail.
PeerConnection has been modified to create data channels of type
QuicDataChannel when the peer wants to do QUIC.
WebRtcSession has ben modified to use a QuicDataTransport
instead of a DtlsTransportChannelWrapper/DataChannel
when QUIC should be used
QuicDataTransport implements the generic functions of
BaseChannel to manage the QuicTransportChannel.
Committed: https://crrev.com/34b54c36a533dadb6ceb70795119194e6f530ef5
Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2166873002
Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13645}
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13657}
Reason for revert:
Reverting because it broke an RTP data channel test on the FYI bots.
Original issue's description:
> Modified PeerConnection and WebRtcSession for end-to-end QuicDataChannel usage.
>
> To allow end-to-end QuicDataChannel usage with a
> PeerConnection, RTCConfiguration has been modified to
> include a boolean for whether to do QUIC, since negotiation of
> QUIC is not implemented. If one peer does QUIC, then it will be
> assumed that the other peer must do QUIC or the connection
> will fail.
>
> PeerConnection has been modified to create data channels of type
> QuicDataChannel when the peer wants to do QUIC.
>
> WebRtcSession has ben modified to use a QuicDataTransport
> instead of a DtlsTransportChannelWrapper/DataChannel
> when QUIC should be used
>
> QuicDataTransport implements the generic functions of
> BaseChannel to manage the QuicTransportChannel.
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/34b54c36a533dadb6ceb70795119194e6f530ef5
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13645}
TBR=pthatcher@webrtc.org,zhihuang@webrtc.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2206793007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13647}
To allow end-to-end QuicDataChannel usage with a
PeerConnection, RTCConfiguration has been modified to
include a boolean for whether to do QUIC, since negotiation of
QUIC is not implemented. If one peer does QUIC, then it will be
assumed that the other peer must do QUIC or the connection
will fail.
PeerConnection has been modified to create data channels of type
QuicDataChannel when the peer wants to do QUIC.
WebRtcSession has ben modified to use a QuicDataTransport
instead of a DtlsTransportChannelWrapper/DataChannel
when QUIC should be used
QuicDataTransport implements the generic functions of
BaseChannel to manage the QuicTransportChannel.
Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2166873002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13645}
This will make it much less likely for application developers to not
realize the object is reference counted.
It also fixes a bug in the Java PeerConnection binding, by allowing a
reference to be transferred in the OnRemoveStream call via std::move.
BUG=webrtc:5128
R=pthatcher@webrtc.org, tkchin@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1972793003 .
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12976}
But keep #including scoped_ptr.h in .h files, so as not to break
WebRTC users who expect those .h files to give them rtc::scoped_ptr.
BUG=webrtc:5520
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1930463002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12530}
This is a follow up to https://codereview.webrtc.org/1859933002 to change this test also to use a separate worker thread.
PeerConnectionEndToEndTest currently use the current thread both as a signaling thread and a worker thread. Although convenient while debugging, it can also hide real bugs. An example is https://codereview.webrtc.org/1766653002/#ps420001 where the worker thread is deadlocked in the track proxy due to that the worker thread waits for the signaling thread but the proxy in turns invokes the worker thread..... That bug was only discovered on Android.
BUG= webrtc:5426
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1860423002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12295}
In addition to the code moved from talk/app/webrtc
there were some files in webrtc/api/objctests that still
had the libjingle license header.
BUG=webrtc:5418
TBR=tkchin@webrtc.org
NOTRY=True
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1680293005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#11552}
The previously disabled warnings that were inherited from
talk/build/common.gypi are now replaced by target-specific disabling
of only the failing warnings. Additional disabling was needed since the stricter
compilation warnings that applies to code in webrtc/.
License headers will be updated in a follow-up CL.
Other modifications:
* Updated the header guards.
* Sorted the includes using chromium/src/tools/sort-headers.py
except for these files:
talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectionendtoend_unittest.cc
talk/app/webrtc/java/jni/androidmediadecoder_jni.cc
talk/app/webrtc/java/jni/androidmediaencoder_jni.cc
webrtc/media/devices/win32devicemanager.cc
The HAVE_SCTP define was added for the peerconnection_unittests target
in api_tests.gyp.
I also checked that none of
SRTP_RELATIVE_PATH
HAVE_SRTP
HAVE_WEBRTC_VIDEO
HAVE_WEBRTC_VOICE
were used by the talk/app/webrtc code.
For Chromium, the following changes will need to be applied to the roll CL that updates the
DEPS for WebRTC and libjingle:
https://codereview.chromium.org/1615433002
BUG=webrtc:5418
NOPRESUBMIT=True
R=deadbeef@webrtc.org, pthatcher@webrtc.org, tommi@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1610243002 .
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#11545}
