All downstream code have been updated to the new location.
In PRESUBMIT.py:
* Remove webrtc/rtc_base from CPP_BLACKLIST
* Add webrtc/rtc_base to LEGACY_API_DIRS
Fix some duplicated paths in
webrtc/modules/audio_processing/test/conversational_speech/BUILD.gn
BUG=webrtc:7634
TBR=kwiberg@webrtc.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2973183002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#18948}
Reland the base->rtc_base without adding stub headers (will be
done in follow-up CL). This preserves git blame history of all files.
BUG=webrtc:7634
NOTRY=True
TBR=kwiberg@webrtc.org
Change-Id: Iea3bb6f3f67b8374c96337b63e8f5aa3e6181012
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/554611
Reviewed-by: Henrik Kjellander <kjellander@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#18821}
This refactoring takes a careful approach to avoid rushing the change:
* stub headers are left in all the old locations of webrtc/base
* existing GN targets are kept and now just forward to the moved ones
using public_deps.
The only exception to the above is the base_java target and its .java files,
which were moved to webrtc/rtc_base right away since it's not possible
to use public_deps for android_library.
To avoid breaking builds, a temporary Dummy.java file was added to
the new intermediate target in webrtc/rtc_base:base_java as well to avoid
hitting a GN assert in the android_library template.
The above approach should make the transition smooth without breaking
downstream.
A helper script was created (https://codereview.webrtc.org/2879203002/)
and was run like this:
stub-headers.py -s webrtc/base -d webrtc/rtc_base -i 7634
stub-headers.py -s webrtc/base/numerics -d webrtc/rtc_base/numerics -i 7634
Fixed invalid header guards in the following files:
webrtc/base/base64.h
webrtc/base/cryptstring.h
webrtc/base/event.h
webrtc/base/flags.h
webrtc/base/httpbase.h
webrtc/base/httpcommon-inl.h
webrtc/base/httpcommon.h
webrtc/base/httpserver.h
webrtc/base/logsinks.h
webrtc/base/macutils.h
webrtc/base/nattypes.h
webrtc/base/openssladapter.h
webrtc/base/opensslstreamadapter.h
webrtc/base/pathutils.h
webrtc/base/physicalsocketserver.h
webrtc/base/proxyinfo.h
webrtc/base/sigslot.h
webrtc/base/sigslotrepeater.h
webrtc/base/socket.h
webrtc/base/socketaddresspair.h
webrtc/base/socketfactory.h
webrtc/base/stringutils.h
webrtc/base/testbase64.h
webrtc/base/testutils.h
webrtc/base/transformadapter.h
webrtc/base/win32filesystem.h
Added new header guards to:
sslroots.h
testbase64.h
BUG=webrtc:7634
NOTRY=True
NOPRESUBMIT=True
R=kwiberg@webrtc.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2877023002 .
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#18816}
This CL adds the flag "PORTALLOCATOR_ENABLE_ANY_ADDRESS_PORTS", which will
force the creation of ports not bound to any specific network interface.
These are normally only used when network enumeration fails or is disabled,
but in some circumstances (such as the one the test case adds), they're the
only thing that works.
This will result in extra ports being gathered, which is why it's only enabled
behind a flag for now. In the future, we could probably introduce more
sophisticated "pruning" logic that would lessen the impact of the extra ports
when they're redundant, and make the flag the default.
Some other minor changes that were required to make this use case work:
* Allow a TCPPort to be used for outgoing connections even if it tries and
fails to create a server socket.
* Allow Bind to fail if being called before Connect, and the IP is an "any"
address (0.0.0.0 or ::), since this bind would have been mostly pointless
anyway.
* Prevent P2PTransprotChannel from keeping a "backup" candidate pair using
an "any address" network; we only want this for actual networks.
BUG=webrtc:7798
Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2936553003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#18578}
Mostly this consists of marking functions with override when
applicable, and moving function bodies from .h to .cc files.
Not inlining virtual functions with simple bodies such as
{ return false; }
strikes me as probably losing more in readability than we gain in
binary size and compilation time, but I guess it's just like any other
case where enabling a generally good warning forces us to write
slightly worse code in a couple of places.
BUG=163
R=kjellander@webrtc.org, tommi@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/47429004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#8656}
git-svn-id: http://webrtc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@8656 4adac7df-926f-26a2-2b94-8c16560cd09d
