There is no need to iterate through all outstanding data chunks to know
if a FORWARD-TSN can be sent. As the FORWARD-TSN will just move the
cumulative TSN ack, if a chunk is found that is not to be expired,
there is no need to continue any further. This makes it much faster
to know if to send a FORWARD-TSN when the congestion window is large.
Bug: webrtc:12799
Change-Id: I58bce408ae9814c8d3d7bbb480b0037a2cf88dd7
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/219625
Reviewed-by: Florent Castelli <orphis@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34176}
Specifying guards for functions and member variables. Also updating
a few places for VideoReceiveStream2 accordingly.
Bug: webrtc:11993
Change-Id: I2d13b009ec9853c6b2d90b08af555ecdd2b1ced6
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220765
Commit-Queue: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Markus Handell <handellm@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34174}
Before this CL, a SACK was generated from scratch based on information
about each received fragment, to generate correct gap-ack-blocks.
When there was a lot of data in the data tracker (due to packet loss),
this took considerate time, as generating a SACK was O(N), where N is
the amount of fragments in the data tracker.
By instead having precomputed gap-ack-blocks that are continuously
updated, generating a SACK is much faster and the memory usage goes down
a bit as well.
Bug: webrtc:12799
Change-Id: I924752c1d6d31f06d27246e10b595e9ccb19320f
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220763
Commit-Queue: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34171}
There limit that decides if an incoming TSN should be accepted or not
was decided based on very small transfers with no packet loss. But in
simulations where a socket tries to send a lot of data and when there
is moderate packet loss, the number of tracker data chunks on the
receive side will be considerably higher than what the limit was.
Set the limit to allow high data rate also on moderate packet loss.
Bug: webrtc:12799
Change-Id: I6ca237e5609d8b511e9b10c919da33dca7420c01
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220761
Reviewed-by: Florent Castelli <orphis@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34169}
The receive buffer mustn't be full; If it's full, and a message can't be
assembled, the socket can't accept more data. To avoid this, there is
a high watermark limit that, when reached, will make the socket only
accept chunks that advance the cumulative ack TSN.
Before this CL, the announced receiver window size in every sent SACK
was based on what the receive buffer could maximally be, which means
that in really high data rate applications, the amount of outstanding
data could actually fill the receive buffer (due to packet loss, that
prevents messages from being reassembled). As the socket started
behaving more conservatively when the high watermark limit was reached,
this resulted in unnecessary T3-RTXes. But by announcing the high
watermark limit instead, the sender will stay within it, and will have
a peer socket that behaves as expected.
Bug: webrtc:12799
Change-Id: Ife2f409914a230640217553c54f60d05843efc70
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220762
Reviewed-by: Florent Castelli <orphis@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34168}
Starting new audio codecs from the top of the lower range
reduces collisions with video codecs which are assigned from
the bottom of the lower range
BUG=webrtc:11640
Change-Id: If6d2b849b8e1de777a1d4352df533e4f1845fde9
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220022
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34166}
There were some missing unit tests that are now written. When doing
this, it was found that SACKs weren't sent for duplicate received
chunks, which they should be according to the spec.
Bug: webrtc:12614
Change-Id: I8296473c0c8cbaf0329785de95e9b9945f254339
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220607
Reviewed-by: Florent Castelli <orphis@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34165}
This is useful in tests and in scenarios where the connection is
monitored externally and the heartbeat monitoring would be of no use.
Bug: webrtc:12614
Change-Id: Ida4f4e2e40fc4d2aa0c27ae9431f434da4cc8313
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220766
Reviewed-by: Florent Castelli <orphis@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34164}
This is in preparation for actually doing this initialization
differently in the Call class. This CL takes the registration
steps that are inherently network thread associated and makes
them separate from the ctor/dtor.
Bug: webrtc:11993
Change-Id: Ice2e16c108e0c302157534a3aa2b46738aaa7a93
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220608
Commit-Queue: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34163}
This is part of moving the thread hops from the network thread to
worker (required by Call) into Call itself so that we can eventually
remove them.
Bug: webrtc:11993
Change-Id: Ib3ccdd6c75a3848daae2e3ce6c9a55d9617c2f50
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220604
Commit-Queue: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Markus Handell <handellm@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34160}
Increases readability of configuration setup by separating
first time configuration setup and reconfiguration.
Bug: None
Change-Id: Ifee29c31bce505a971ab5993cb862a72db94725a
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220700
Reviewed-by: Henrik Andreassson <henrika@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Markus Handell <handellm@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34159}
This change collects the receive stats that Call
maintains into a new thread-compatible
internal class which can easily be switched to
the network thread.
Bug: webrtc:11993
Change-Id: I9fa9a7f057149789aa327e5ba8a8cb3379762272
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220760
Reviewed-by: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Markus Handell <handellm@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34158}
* Use cgi.escape for Python 2.7 and html.escape for Python 3.
* Modify unittest to succeed in both Python 2.7 and 3.
No-Presubmit: True
Bug: None
Change-Id: Ie711873468145c9abbd12313086ebe7358e20ab7
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220621
Reviewed-by: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34156}
This is currently unused and since we ultimately don't want the delivery
of packets to be async at this stage (but rather stay on the network
thread), we don't need it.
Bug: webrtc:11993
Change-Id: I6809026b6901c8ecfacd961e98ddf79aaa16d0bd
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220601
Reviewed-by: Markus Handell <handellm@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Markus Handell <handellm@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34152}
This change creates trace events with a single parameter
composed of ClassName::Method.
The change additionally causes the duration of the proxy call to be
traced, not only the occurrence.
Fixed: webrtc:12787
Change-Id: I1689862318d4c6fc1dcef343c3ccf3ae9f7e17df
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/219788
Commit-Queue: Markus Handell <handellm@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34149}
This is similar to Change-Id: I12a16f44f775da3711f3aa52a68a0bf24f70d2f8
but with the entire send buffer as scope, not a single stream.
This can be used by clients to take alternate action (such as delaying
transmission or using other buffering) if the send buffer ever becomes
full, as they can now be notified when the send buffer is no longer
full.
Bug: webrtc:12794
Change-Id: Icf3be3b118888ffb5ced955fd7ba4826a37140f9
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220360
Commit-Queue: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34143}
This adds the necessary properties and callback to the Send Queue to
support the bufferedAmount & bufferedAmountLowThreshold properties and
the bufferedamountlow event in RTCDataChannel.
The public API changes and socket support comes in a follow-up CL.
Bug: webrtc:12794
Change-Id: I12a16f44f775da3711f3aa52a68a0bf24f70d2f8
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/219690
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34142}
If a not fully sent message is abandoned, there must be a TSN
representing the end of that message (even if that fragment is never
sent), as the receiver can otherwise reject the next sent message as it
hasn't seen any end of the previous one.
A long explanation can be found at
https://github.com/sctplab/usrsctp/issues/592#issuecomment-849047689
Bug: webrtc:12812
Change-Id: I09c571bd6dd2774b0c147d4e5ddac67d2aa64fea
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220361
Commit-Queue: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34140}
Recalculating outstanding bytes is expensive when the congestion window
is large, as it iterates over all inflight data chunks. By doing it
incrementally, it will be a constant operation in most cases, and
in the remaining cases, a function of the number of chunks acked in a
single SACK, which is typically just a few chunks.
Implementing this fix required some refactoring to calculate it
correctly (and to be honest, it was likely done incorrectly previously).
Previously, the state of an item in the retransmission queue was
simplified as "in flight", "acked", "nacked", "abandoned", but these
were not completely orthogonal. A chunk could be abandoned while it was
in-flight or it could be abandoned because it was lost. The difference
between these if that chunk should be accounted for in
outstanding_bytes() or not.
Unit tests have been added to verify this.
Bug: webrtc:12799
Change-Id: I72341538bb0c4f8f89555b08f0c8a28815f0f828
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/219623
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34139}
We need to specify that the cursor should be included in the stream as
by default xdg-desktop-portal defaults to hidden cursor.
Bug: chromium:1202526
Change-Id: Ic4742da2e51f7ed28cb9d7b6b0c069c1fa7d0cee
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/214782
Reviewed-by: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Erik Språng <sprang@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34137}
Since all test cases that used RtpSenderEgress have been refactored or
moved, we can now get rid of lot of test fixture crud:
* Remove RtpSenderContext helper, make sender normal member.
* Remove test transport helper
* Remove task queue helper (needed for thread checks in egress)
* Remove various mocks no longer used
* Remove RtpSenderWithoutPacer subclass
* Remove WithWithoutOverhead parametrization (only affect egress)
..plus some cleanup of how configs are created.
Bug: webrtc:11340
Change-Id: I5c581d60862fc6dc2b99f76058782309dc7aef4d
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220280
Commit-Queue: Erik Språng <sprang@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Danil Chapovalov <danilchap@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34135}
Thus removing dependency on RtpSenderEgress, allowing simplification of
the test fixture in a follow-up.
Bug: webrtc:11340
Change-Id: I9772bab18d1f4a04e0deccc9125d4b1c16c30d7a
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/219627
Commit-Queue: Erik Språng <sprang@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Danil Chapovalov <danilchap@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34132}
Deprecate CreateDataChannel, and make it a simple wrapper function.
Bug: webrtc:12796
Change-Id: I053d75a264596ba87ca734a29df9241de93a80c3
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/219784
Reviewed-by: Xavier Lepaul <xalep@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34130}
Reland of commit a743303211b89bbcf4cea438ee797bbbc7b59e80
Previously, RTP header extensions with encryption had been filtered
if the encryption had been activated (not the other way around) which
was likely an unintended logic inversion.
In addition, it ensures that encrypted RTP header extensions are only
negotiated if RTP header extension encryption is turned on. Formerly,
which extensions had been negotiated depended on the order in which
they were inserted, regardless of whether or not header encryption was
actually enabled, leading to no extensions being sent on the wire.
Further changes:
- If RTP header encryption enabled, prefer encrypted extensions over
non-encrypted extensions
- Add most extensions to list of extensions supported for encryption
- Discard encrypted extensions in a session description in case encryption
is not supported for that extension
- Mark FindHeaderExtensionByUri without filter argument as deprecated
Bug: webrtc:11713
Change-Id: I52a5ade1b94bc01d1c2a35cb56023684fcaf9982
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/219081
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34129}
