
This carries around unsupported content descriptions (i.e. things where webrtc does not understand the media type or protocol) in a special data type so that a rejected content or mediasection is added to the answer SDP. BUG=webrtc:3513 Change-Id: Ifc4168eae11e899f2504649de5e1eecb6801a9fb Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/179082 Reviewed-by: Kári Helgason <kthelgason@webrtc.org> Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org> Commit-Queue: Philipp Hancke <philipp.hancke@googlemail.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32410}
How to write code in the api/
directory
Mostly, just follow the regular style guide, but:
- Note that
api/
code is not exempt from the “.h
and.cc
files come in pairs” rule, so if you declare something inapi/path/to/foo.h
, it should be defined inapi/path/to/foo.cc
. - Headers in
api/
should, if possible, not#include
headers outsideapi/
. It’s not always possible to avoid this, but be aware that it adds to a small mountain of technical debt that we’re trying to shrink. .cc
files inapi/
, on the other hand, are free to#include
headers outsideapi/
.
That is, the preferred way for api/
code to access non-api/
code is to call
it from a .cc
file, so that users of our API headers won’t transitively
#include
non-public headers.
For headers in api/
that need to refer to non-public types, forward
declarations are often a lesser evil than including non-public header files. The
usual rules still apply, though.
.cc
files in api/
should preferably be kept reasonably small. If a
substantial implementation is needed, consider putting it with our non-public
code, and just call it from the api/
.cc
file.