
I gave up on removing proxy_info, user_agent and tcp_options. I don't think it's feasible to remove them without removing all the proxy code. The assumption that you can set the proxy and user agent long after you have created the factory is entrenched in unit tests and the code itself. So is the ability to set tcp opts depending on protocol or endpoint properties. It may be easier to untangle proxy stuff from the factory later, when it becomes a more first-class citizen and isn't passed via the allocator. Requires https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1778870 to land first. Bug: webrtc:7447 Change-Id: Ib496e2bb689ea415e9f8ec1dfedff13a83fa4a8a Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/150799 Commit-Queue: Patrik Höglund <phoglund@webrtc.org> Reviewed-by: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29091}
How to write code in the api/
directory
Mostly, just follow the regular style guide, but:
- Note that
api/
code is not exempt from the “.h
and.cc
files come in pairs” rule, so if you declare something inapi/path/to/foo.h
, it should be defined inapi/path/to/foo.cc
. - Headers in
api/
should, if possible, not#include
headers outsideapi/
. It’s not always possible to avoid this, but be aware that it adds to a small mountain of technical debt that we’re trying to shrink. .cc
files inapi/
, on the other hand, are free to#include
headers outsideapi/
.
That is, the preferred way for api/
code to access non-api/
code is to call
it from a .cc
file, so that users of our API headers won’t transitively
#include
non-public headers.
For headers in api/
that need to refer to non-public types, forward
declarations are often a lesser evil than including non-public header files. The
usual rules still apply, though.
.cc
files in api/
should preferably be kept reasonably small. If a
substantial implementation is needed, consider putting it with our non-public
code, and just call it from the api/
.cc
file.