Pick #49403
If the two arrays have the same non-null elements, they are considered
overlapping, and the result is 1.
If the two arrays have no common non-null elements and either array
contains a null element, the result is null.
Otherwise, the result is 0.
```
select arrays_overlap([1, 2, 3], [1, null]); -- result should be 1
select arrays_overlap([2, 3], [1, null]); -- result should be null
select arrays_overlap([2, 3], [1]); -- result should be 0
```
### What problem does this PR solve?
### What problem does this PR solve?
Problem Summary:
In HiveMetaStoreCache, the function FileInputFormat.setInputPaths is
used to set input paths. However, this function splits paths using
commas, which is not the expected behavior. As a result, when partition
values contain commas, it leads to incorrect path parsing and potential
errors.
```java
public static void setInputPaths(JobConf conf, String org.apache.hadoop.shaded.com.aSeparatedPaths) {
setInputPaths(conf, StringUtils.stringToPath(
getPathStrings(org.apache.hadoop.shaded.com.aSeparatedPaths)));
}
```
To prevent FileInputFormat.setInputPaths from splitting paths by commas,
we use another overloaded version of the method. Instead of passing a
comma-separated string, we explicitly pass a Path object, ensuring that
partition values containing commas are handled correctly.
```java
public static void setInputPaths(JobConf conf, Path... inputPaths) {
Path path = new Path(conf.getWorkingDirectory(), inputPaths[0]);
StringBuffer str = new StringBuffer(StringUtils.escapeString(path.toString()));
for(int i = 1; i < inputPaths.length;i++) {
str.append(StringUtils.COMMA_STR);
path = new Path(conf.getWorkingDirectory(), inputPaths[i]);
str.append(StringUtils.escapeString(path.toString()));
}
conf.set(org.apache.hadoop.shaded.org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.lib.input.
FileInputFormat.INPUT_DIR, str.toString());
}
```
### Release note
None
### What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #xxx
Related PR: #xxx
Problem Summary:
### Release note
None
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [ ] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
pick: #49087
Related PR: #40441
Problem Summary:
wrong calculation of emoji character length in some String function when
do constant folding in FE. For example:
select STRLEFT('😊😉👍', 2);
should return 😊😉, but fe return 😊 only when folding constant
fixed functions:
- left
- strleft
- right
- strright
- locate
- character_length
- split_by_string
- overlay
- replace_empty
…8872)
https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/48872
before
```
mysql> select STR_TO_DATE (' ', '%Y-%m-%d %H:%i:%s');
+-----------------------------------------+
| STR_TO_DATE (' ', '%Y-%m-%d %H:%i:%s') |
+-----------------------------------------+
| |
+-----------------------------------------+
```
now
```
mysql> select STR_TO_DATE (' ', '%Y-%m-%d %H:%i:%s');
+-----------------------------------------+
| STR_TO_DATE (' ', '%Y-%m-%d %H:%i:%s') |
+-----------------------------------------+
| NULL |
+-----------------------------------------+
```
Problem Summary:
None
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [x] Regression test
- [x] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been
changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [x] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [x] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
### What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #xxx
Related PR: #xxx
Problem Summary:
### Release note
None
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [ ] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
### What problem does this PR solve?
when nereids cast invalid date literal to date like type, it will throws
exceptions:
```
select '' = cast('2020-10-20' as date);
(1105, 'errCode = 2, detailMessage = date/datetime literal [] is invalid')
```
But old planner will not throw exceptions, so let neredis don't throw
exceptions too.
This PR is pick code from: #40202
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [x] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
### What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #xxx
Related PR: Pick #48554
Problem Summary:
### Release note
None
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [x] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [x] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [x] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
…ession #48103 (#48456)"
This reverts commit 4979d706127044598b1af853d1c2d69ab3f2cebb.
cherry-pick: #48688
revert: #48103
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [ ] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
if we set session variable for fold_constant_for_be = 1 and
enable_decimal256 = true
here will meet error in sql
```
SELECT ARRAY_AVG(CAST([] AS ARRAY < DECIMALV3(1,0) > ));
```
with core
```
SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /mnt/disk1/wangqiannan/amory/doris/be/src/vec/columns/column_decimal.h:200:15 in
0# doris::signal::(anonymous namespace)::FailureSignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*) at /mnt/disk1/wangqiannan/amory/doris/be/src/common/signal_handler.h:421
1# PosixSignals::chained_handler(int, siginfo*, void*) [clone .part.0] in /mnt/disk1/wangqiannan/tool/jdk-17.0.10/lib/server/libjvm.so
2# JVM_handle_linux_signal in /mnt/disk1/wangqiannan/tool/jdk-17.0.10/lib/server/libjvm.so
3# 0x00007FD98C1A2B50 in /lib64/libc.so.6
4# doris::vectorized::ColumnDecimal<doris::vectorized::Decimal<wide::integer<256ul, int> > >::get_data_at(unsigned long) const at /mnt/disk1/wangqiannan/amory/doris/be/src/vec/columns/column_decimal.h:201
5# doris::vectorized::DataTypeDecimalSerDe<doris::vectorized::Decimal<wide::integer<256ul, int> > >::write_column_to_pb(doris::vectorized::IColumn const&, doris::PValues&, long, long) const at /mnt/disk1/wangqiannan/amory/doris/be/src/vec/data_types/serde/data_type_decimal_serde.h:158
6# doris::vectorized::DataTypeNullableSerDe::write_column_to_pb(doris::vectorized::IColumn const&, doris::PValues&, long, long) const at /mnt/disk1/wangqiannan/amory/doris/be/src/vec/data_types/serde/data_type_nullable_serde.cpp:237
7# doris::FoldConstantExecutor::fold_constant_vexpr(doris::TFoldConstantParams const&, doris::PConstantExprResult*) at /mnt/disk1/wangqiannan/amory/doris/be/src/runtime/fold_constant_executor.cpp:118
8# doris::PInternalService::_fold_constant_expr(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, doris::PConstantExprResult*) at /mnt/disk1/wangqiannan/amory/doris/be/src/service/internal_service.cpp:1537
9# doris::PInternalService::fold_constant_expr(google::protobuf::RpcController*, doris::PConstantExprRequest const*, doris::PConstantExprResult*, google::protobuf::Closure*)::$_0::operator()() const at /mnt/disk1/wangqiannan/amory/doris/be/src/service/internal_service.cpp:1515
10# void std::__invoke_impl<void, doris::PInternalService::fold_constant_expr(google::protobuf::RpcController*, doris::PConstantExprRequest const*, doris::PConstantExprResult*, google::protobuf::Closure*)::$_0&>(std::__invoke_other, doris::PInternalService::fold_constant_expr(google::protobuf::RpcController*, doris::PConstantExprRequest const*, doris::PConstantExprResult*, google::protobuf::Closure*)::$_0&) at /mnt/disk1/wangqiannan/tool/ldb_toolchain_16/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/invoke.h:61
11# std::enable_if<is_invocable_r_v<void, doris::PInternalService::fold_constant_expr(google::protobuf::RpcController*, doris::PConstantExprRequest const*, doris::PConstantExprResult*, google::protobuf::Closure*)::$_0&>, void>::type std::__invoke_r<void, doris::PInternalService::fold_constant_expr(google::protobuf::RpcController*, doris::PConstantExprRequest const*, doris::PConstantExprResult*, google::protobuf::Closure*)::$_0&>(doris::PInternalService::fold_constant_expr(google::protobuf::RpcController*, doris::PConstantExprRequest const*, doris::PConstantExprResult*, google::protobuf::Closure*)::$_0&) at /mnt/disk1/wangqiannan/tool/ldb_toolchain_16/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/invoke.h:117
12# std::_Function_handler<void (), doris::PInternalService::fold_constant_expr(google::protobuf::RpcController*, doris::PConstantExprRequest const*, doris::PConstantExprResult*, google::protobuf::Closure*)::$_0>::_M_invoke(std::_Any_data const&) at /mnt/disk1/wangqiannan/tool/ldb_toolchain_16/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/std_function.h:291
13# std::function<void ()>::operator()() const at /mnt/disk1/wangqiannan/tool/ldb_toolchain_16/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/std_function.h:560
14# doris::WorkThreadPool<false>::work_thread(int) at /mnt/disk1/wangqiannan/amory/doris/be/src/util/work_thread_pool.hpp:158
15# void std::__invoke_impl<void, void (doris::WorkThreadPool<false>::* const&)(int), doris::WorkThreadPool<false>*&, int&>(std::__invoke_memfun_deref, void (doris::WorkThreadPool<false>::* const&)(int), doris::WorkThreadPool<false>*&, int&) at /mnt/disk1/wangqiannan/tool/ldb_toolchain_16/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/invoke.h:74
16# std::__invoke_result<void (doris::WorkThreadPool<false>::* const&)(int), doris::WorkThreadPool<false>*&, int&>::type std::__invoke<void (doris::WorkThreadPool<false>::* const&)(int), doris::WorkThreadPool<false>*&, int&>(void (doris::WorkThreadPool<false>::* const&)(int), doris::WorkThreadPool<false>*&, int&) at /mnt/disk1/wangqiannan/tool/ldb_toolchain_16/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/invoke.h:96
```
### What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #xxx
Related PR: #xxx
Problem Summary:
### Release note
None
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [ ] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
