Boost tokenizer requires explicit "." after "$" to correctly extract
JSON path tokens. Without this, expressions like "$[0].key" cannot be
properly split, causing issues in downstream logic. This commit ensures
a "." is automatically added after "$" to maintain consistent token
parsing behavior.
### What problem does this PR solve?
only in branch-2.1 we do not support old indexDef to support Ip type
and fix array_contains && arrays_overlap for with type array<ip> which
backport: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/50637
Issue Number: close #xxx
### What problem does this PR solve?
Cherry-picked from #51651
### Release note
None
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [ ] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
### What problem does this PR solve?
Problem Summary:
pick from master (#50913)
### Release note
None
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [ ] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
Pick #50993
Introduced by #51050
The build block maybe be `clear_column_mem_not_keep` in build phase when
the operator is closed.
```cpp
Status HashJoinBuildSinkLocalState::close(RuntimeState* state, Status exec_status) {
if (_closed) {
return Status::OK();
}
auto& p = _parent->cast<HashJoinBuildSinkOperatorX>();
Defer defer {[&]() {
if (!_should_build_hash_table) {
return;
}
// The build side hash key column maybe no need output, but we need to keep the column in block
// because it is used to compare with probe side hash key column
if (p._should_keep_hash_key_column && _build_col_ids.size() == 1) {
p._should_keep_column_flags[_build_col_ids[0]] = true;
}
if (_shared_state->build_block) {
// release the memory of unused column in probe stage
_shared_state->build_block->clear_column_mem_not_keep(p._should_keep_column_flags,
p._use_shared_hash_table);
}
if (p._use_shared_hash_table) {
std::unique_lock lock(p._mutex);
p._signaled = true;
for (auto& dep : _shared_state->sink_deps) {
dep->set_ready();
}
for (auto& dep : p._finish_dependencies) {
dep->set_ready();
}
}
}};
```
```
*** Aborted at 1747343165 (unix time) try "date -d @1747343165" if you are using GNU date ***
*** Current BE git commitID: e7a3e78b97 ***
*** SIGSEGV address not mapped to object (@0x1) received by PID 7474 (TID 9641 OR 0x7f3f8c0e5640) from PID 1; stack trace: ***
0# doris::signal::(anonymous namespace)::FailureSignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*) at /root/doris/be/src/common/signal_handler.h:421
1# PosixSignals::chained_handler(int, siginfo*, void*) [clone .part.0] in /usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk-amd64/lib/server/libjvm.so
2# JVM_handle_linux_signal in /usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk-amd64/lib/server/libjvm.so
3# 0x00007F4368F76520 in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
4# doris::Status doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<7>::finish_probing > > >(doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed > >&, doris::vectorized::MutableBlock&, doris::vectorized::Block*, bool*, bool) at /root/doris/be/src/pipeline/exec/join/process_hash_table_probe_impl.h:738
5# std::__detail::__variant::__gen_vtable_impl (*)(doris::pipeline::HashJoinProbeOperatorX::pull(doris::RuntimeState*, doris::vectorized::Block*, bool*) const::$_1&&, std::variant > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber, doris::JoinHashTable, HashCRC32 > > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber, doris::JoinHashTable, HashCRC32 > > >, doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed > >, doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed, HashCRC32 > > >, doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed > >, doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed, HashCRC32 > > >, doris::vectorized::MethodStringNoCache > > >&, std::variant, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<2>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<8>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<1>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<4>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<3>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<7>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<9>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<10>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<11> >&)>, std::integer_sequence >::__visit_invoke(doris::pipeline::HashJoinProbeOperatorX::pull(doris::RuntimeState*, doris::vectorized::Block*, bool*) const::$_1&&, std::variant > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber, doris::JoinHashTable, HashCRC32 > > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber, doris::JoinHashTable, HashCRC32 > > >, doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed > >, doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed, HashCRC32 > > >, doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed > >, doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed, HashCRC32 > > >, doris::vectorized::MethodStringNoCache > > >&, std::variant, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<2>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<8>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<1>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<4>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<3>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<7>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<9>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<10>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<11> >&) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/variant:1013
6# doris::pipeline::HashJoinProbeOperatorX::pull(doris::RuntimeState*, doris::vectorized::Block*, bool*) const at /root/doris/be/src/pipeline/exec/hashjoin_probe_operator.cpp:281
7# doris::pipeline::StatefulOperatorX::get_block(doris::RuntimeState*, doris::vectorized::Block*, bool*) at /root/doris/be/src/pipeline/exec/operator.cpp:670
8# doris::pipeline::OperatorXBase::get_block_after_projects(doris::RuntimeState*, doris::vectorized::Block*, bool*) at /root/doris/be/src/pipeline/exec/operator.cpp:381
9# doris::pipeline::PipelineTask::execute(bool*) in /mnt/hdd01/ci/doris-deploy-master-local/be/lib/doris_be
10# doris::pipeline::TaskScheduler::_do_work(int) at /root/doris/be/src/pipeline/task_scheduler.cpp:144
11# doris::ThreadPool::dispatch_thread() at /root/doris/be/src/util/threadpool.cpp:622
12# doris::Thread::supervise_thread(void*) at /root/doris/be/src/util/thread.cpp:469
13# start_thread at ./nptl/pthread_create.c:442
14# 0x00007F436905A850 at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone3.S:83
```
Related PR: #xxx
Problem Summary:
None
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [ ] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been
changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
### What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #xxx
Related PR: #xxx
Problem Summary:
### Release note
None
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [ ] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
### What problem does this PR solve?
cherry-pick from master (#49381)
### Release note
None
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [ ] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
