### What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close#41460
Problem Summary:
When reading the Iceberg table, previously read `DeleteRows` should not
be released immediately, as the Iceberg data file is split into multiple
`IcebergSplit`s for execution. These `IcebergSplit`s belong to the same
data file, meaning they share the same `DeleteRows`. Therefore,
`DeleteRows` in the `DeleteFile` should not be released prematurely.
Instead, they should be released when the shared_kv is reset, at which
point all `DeleteRows` will be freed along with the cached `DeleteFile`.
### Release note
None
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [ ] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
### What problem does this PR solve?
bp https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/47697
### Release note
None
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [ ] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [x] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [x] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [x] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [x] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
### What problem does this PR solve?
sql
```
SELECT *, ROW_NUMBER() OVER ( PARTITION BY orderid ORDER BY v DESC ) AS row_idfirst FROM test_v_legacy order by orderid;
```
core:
```
F20250225 11:23:08.735848 1788347 column_object.h:439] should not call the method in column object
*** Check failure stack trace: ***
F20250225 11:23:08.736686 1788345 column_object.h:439] should not call the method in column object
*** Check failure stack trace: ***
@ 0x5555fa0821b6 google::LogMessage::SendToLog()
@ 0x5555fa0821b6 google::LogMessage::SendToLog()
@ 0x5555fa07ec00 google::LogMessage::Flush()
@ 0x5555fa07ec00 google::LogMessage::Flush()
@ 0x5555fa0829f9 google::LogMessageFatal::~LogMessageFatal()
@ 0x5555fa0829f9 google::LogMessageFatal::~LogMessageFatal()
@ 0x5555dd722b1c doris::vectorized::ColumnObject::get_permutation()
@ 0x5555dd722b1c doris::vectorized::ColumnObject::get_permutation()
@ 0x5555dd6b933c doris::vectorized::ColumnNullable::get_permutation()
@ 0x5555dd6b933c doris::vectorized::ColumnNullable::get_permutation()
@ 0x5555dde3997f doris::vectorized::sort_block()
@ 0x5555dde3997f doris::vectorized::sort_block()
@ 0x5555e2f13646 doris::vectorized::Sorter::partial_sort()
@ 0x5555e2f13646 doris::vectorized::Sorter::partial_sort()
@ 0x5555e2f1503b doris::vectorized::FullSorter::_do_sort()
@ 0x5555e2f1503b doris::vectorized::FullSorter::_do_sort()
@ 0x5555e2f15a2f doris::vectorized::FullSorter::prepare_for_read()
@ 0x5555e2f15a2f doris::vectorized::FullSorter::prepare_for_read()
@ 0x5555f97fb76a doris::pipeline::SortSinkOperatorX::sink()
@ 0x5555f97fb76a doris::pipeline::SortSinkOperatorX::sink()
@ 0x5555fa018798 doris::pipeline::PipelineXTask::execute()
@ 0x5555fa018798 doris::pipeline::PipelineXTask::execute()
@ 0x5555fa04efe5 doris::pipeline::TaskScheduler::_do_work()
@ 0x5555fa04efe5 doris::pipeline::TaskScheduler::_do_work()
@ 0x5555fa052f2b doris::pipeline::TaskScheduler::start()::$_0::operator()()
@ 0x5555fa052f2b doris::pipeline::TaskScheduler::start()::$_0::operator()()
```
Issue Number: close #xxx
Related PR: #xxx
Problem Summary:
### Release note
None
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [x] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
pick:#47966
Related PR: #40744， #47228
Problem Summary:
When numeric function input or output out of boundary when fe folding
constant, it would throw an exception before. Now
we change it to match with be execution result, which is NullLiteral
### What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #xxx
Related PR: #xxx
Problem Summary:
### Release note
None
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [ ] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
### What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #xxx
Related PR: #xxx
Problem Summary:
### Release note
None
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [ ] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
