A follow-up to 585a2e4e. A couple of tests with the new rich tooltip were flaky.
We suppose the reason is some problem related to widgets lifecycle. This PR
doesn't fix the issue, but isolates testing of the tooltip related logic related
inside its own test, which should make it not flaky.
This is a temporal solution, we're going to move all these code to using
glimmer components.
Without this fix, the following error is raised:
```
ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid:
PG::SyntaxError: ERROR: syntax error at or near ")"
LINE 4: WHERE thread_id IN ()
```
This is not a valid route and is causing routing errors to be raised in
the test env adding noise to the logs. We'll just "handle" the route in
the test env.
Why this change?
The process's pid is useful when we're trying to link output from
different processes together. In this case, we want to be able to link
the Rails server logs to the right rspec process.
Before:
[2] Viewing sidebar mobile collapses the sidebar when clicking outside of it
After:
[2] (#176342) Viewing sidebar mobile collapses the sidebar when clicking outside of it
Why this change?
Chat system tests that opens the message actions on mobile have been
flaky on our CI. Those system test usually fails when the message
actions do not show up as expected causing subsequent actions to fail.
In the case of the `Reply to message - channel - mobile when the message has an existing thread replies to the existing thread`
system test, failure screenshot shows that we ended up navigating to the
thread instead of opening the message actions button. To understand why
this happens, we first need to understand that by default Capybara clicks
on the centre of an element. Also, we need to note that the HTML structure of
a chat message is like so:
```
<div class="chat-message-container">
<div class="chat-message">
<div class="chat-message-avatar" />
<div class="chat-message-content" />
<div class="chat-message-thread-indicator" />
</div>
</div>
```
Since `PageObjects::Pages::ChatChannel#expand_message_actions_mobile`
attempts to click on the `.chat-message-contaier`, there is a
possibility that the center of that element is the
`.chat-message-thread-indicator` element which would explain why we
navigated to the thread list instead of opening up the message actions.
This is possible because the content of the original chat message as
well as the message excerpt in the thread is randomly generated where the
length of the message and how the text wraps on mobile can affect the
height of the `.chat-message-content` element as thus its position in
the `.chat-message-container` element. In most cases, the middle of the
`.chat-message-container` happens to be the `.chat-message-content`
which is why this test "flakes" sometimes.
What is the solution?
Instead of clicking on the `.chat-message-container`, we be more
specific and click on the `.chat-message-content` element instead.
Why is this change required?
We've been seeing flaky tests due to server errors on CI but are unable
to debug it because we do not log any of the errors. This change gives
us a fighting chance the next time we encounter a server error during
system test runs.
See
https://github.com/discourse/discourse/actions/runs/5459248864/jobs/9935049920?pr=22424
for an example of server errors encountered during system tests.
Previously , the test was flaky and failing with a selenium stale
element error because we were retrieving the tag nodes with `all` and
then calling `.map(&:text)` on it. However, there is a chance that a
re-render happens and those nodes will end up being stale resulting in
the selenium error.
It's very simple import script and currently imports only the following content:
* Users
* Messages as Discourse topics/posts
* Attachments
Each channel can be mapped to a category and tags. It uses regular expressions to convert formatted messages ("rich text") into Markdown used by Discourse. In the future we could convert the `blocks` attribute from each message into Markdown instead of applying regular expressions on the `text` attribute.
Previously, the `@model` argument would be unset before the component's `willDestroy` hook was called. Wrapping up the component and the opts in a single tracked `activeModal` field, and then using the `#each` helper with an array of 1 element means that Glimmer will keep the `@model` argument available until the end of the component's lifecycle.
* UX: make timestamp font size smaller
* UX: participants use copy instead of avatar
* FIX: Move thread participant count into i18n
---------
Co-authored-by: Martin Brennan <martin@discourse.org>
* DEV: Fix flaky thread nav spec
When we transitioned from the chat thread panel under some conditions
the request for the thread would come back and realise the component
was destroyed, which was trying to do a transition to the channel
itself.
Now we check for the previous route here too and transition to the
correct route.
* DEV: Fix chat transcript spec relying on animation
The on-animation-end modifier is not reliable in system specs
because it fires instantly (we have disabled capybara animations)
so the showCopySuccess boolean can be mutated back to false straight
away.
Better to have a separate boolean tracked with a data-attr that we
can reliably inspect in the system spec.
Why this change?
By ensuring the reset happens in an `ensure` code block, we ensure that
the code will always be run even if code fails or an error is raised.
This helps to prevent leaking custom network condition states and
improves the stability of our system tests.
Recently, site setting watched_precedence_over_muted was introduced - https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/22252
In this PR, we are allowing users to override it. The option is only displayed when the user has watched categories and muted tags, or vice versa.
What is the problem?
Before this change, we were relying on the `/tags` endpoint which
returned all the tags that are visible to a give user on the site leading to potential performance problems.
The attribute keys of the response also changes based on the `tags_listed_by_group` site setting.
What is the fix?
This commit fixes the problems listed above by creating a dedicate `#list` action in the
`TagsController` to handle the listing of the tags in the edit
navigation menu tags modal. This is because the `TagsController#index`
action was created specifically for the `/tags` route and the response
body does not really map well to what we need. The `TagsController#list`
action added here is also much safer since the response is paginated and
we avoid loading a whole bunch of tags upfront.
What is the problem?
This regressed in fe294ab1a77c1026b6996550eb8c36b6f07e1b73 and we did
not have any tests on mobile to catch the regression. The problem was
that we were conditionally rendering the edit nav menu modals component
in the sidebar. However, the sidebar is collapsed on mobile when a
button is clicked. When the sidebar collapses, the edit nav menu modals
ended up being destroyed with it.
Why this change?
A new component based API for modals was introduced in
b3a23bd9d6abdff2d87d4f32866a27cb6770f499. This commit moves the edit
navigation menu tags and categories modal to the new API.
This allows us to use `getOwner(this)` on widgets (without needing to resort to our custom `discourse-common/lib/get-owner` implementation which has a hacky fallback)
`_self` is the default, so we should treat it the same as having no value specified. This fixes navigation to links like `/my/...` in custom sidebar links.
- Inline mentions on posts
- Inline mentions on chat messages
- The user autocomplete for the composer
- The user autocomplete for chat
- The chat section of the sidebar
