Introduces the concept of image thumbnails in chat, prior to this we uploaded and used full size chat images within channels and direct messages.
The following changes are covered:
- Post processing of image uploads to create the thumbnail within Chat::MessageProcessor
- Extract responsive image ratios into CookedProcessorMixin (used for creating upload variations)
- Add thumbnail to upload serializer from plugin.rb
- Convert chat upload template to glimmer component using .gjs format
- Use thumbnail image within chat upload component (stores full size img in orig-src data attribute)
- Old uploads which don't have thumbnails will fallback to full size images in channels/DMs
- Update Magnific lightbox to use full size image when clicked
- Update Glimmer lightbox to use full size image (enables zooming for chat images)
I took the wrong approach here, need to rethink.
* Revert "FIX: Use Guardian.basic_user instead of new (anon) (#24705)"
This reverts commit 9057272ee242b3bc977e50977b4142066c36c05d.
* Revert "DEV: Remove unnecessary method_missing from GuardianUser (#24735)"
This reverts commit a5d4bf6dd28a8304ccd519536f33bd4a13232ed4.
* Revert "DEV: Improve Guardian devex (#24706)"
This reverts commit 77b6a038bae010c9e9e630a137f9ccd570f60784.
* Revert "FIX: Introduce Guardian::BasicUser for oneboxing checks (#24681)"
This reverts commit de983796e1b66aa2ab039a4fb6e32cec8a65a098.
This consistently fails on core now, see
https://github.com/discourse/discourse/actions/runs/7109919490/job/19355591619?pr=24738
Error: QUnit Test Failure: Browser Id 2 - Discourse Chat | Component | chat message collapser images: escapes link
not ok 444 Chrome 120.0 - [58 ms] - Browser Id 2 - Discourse Chat | Component | chat message collapser images: escapes link
---
actual: >
false
expected: >
true
stack: >
Expected value is %3Cscript%3Esomeeviltitle%3C/script%3E and actual value is
<script>someeviltitle</script>
c.f. de983796e1b66aa2ab039a4fb6e32cec8a65a098
There will soon be additional login_required checks
for Guardian, and the intent of many checks by automated
systems is better fulfilled by using BasicUser, which
simulates a logged in TL0 forum user, rather than an
anon user.
In some cases the use of anon still makes sense (e.g.
anonymous_cache), and in that case the more explicit
`Guardian.anon_user` is used
The previous query would look at the existing messages, count them, and update the associated thread.
But, if for some reason messages were **ALL** deleted without updating the `replies_count`, then the query wouldn't find any message, and wouldn't update any thread's `replies_count`.
We're seeing some deprecation warnings in production. This is because we're passing a raw Ruby timestamp, which gets stringified implicitly when written to Redis. As per #15842, this conversion needs to be done explicitly.
This outlet allows to redefine the button displayed when asking the user to join a channel.
The following outletArgs are sent to the outlet:
```
onJoinChannel
channel
icon
title
label
disabled
```
Prior to this fix direct message would always show "Chat in ..." when hovering the channel even if you were hovering a direct message channel with another user (or yourself).
We will now correctly show:
- `Chat in ...` for group channels
- `Chat with ...` for direct message channels
Previously the spec could be flakey as the long message could show on the screen while we await for processing. Now we will first check to have the error message on screen, at this point the erroneous message should never be visible.
In other kind of channels we will only unfollow but for group channels we don't want people to keep appearing in members list.
This commit also creates appropriate services:
- `Chat::LeaveChannel`
- `Chat::UnfollowChannel`
And dedicated endpoint for unfollow: `DELETE /chat/api/channels/:id/memberships/me/follows`
This change refactors the check `user.groups.any?` and instead uses
`user.staged?` to check if the user is staged or not.
Also fixes several tests to ensure the users have their auto trust level
groups created.
Follow up to:
- 8a45f84277e6e13bc48b8f4e40350a9cbd5cd2ee
- 447d9b210556e64c14f9ca9f8f9b52f54090cd41
- c89edd9e86870f97a770816210d71400f09181f2
This PR introduces thread support for channel archives. Now, threaded messages are rendered inside a `details` HTML tag in posts.
The transcript markdown rules now support two new attributes: `threadId` and `threadTitle`.
- If `threadId` is present, all nested `chat` tags are rendered inside the first one.
- `threadTitle` (optional) defines the summary content.
```
[chat threadId=19 ... ]
thread OM
[chat ... ]
thread reply
[/chat]
[/chat]
```
If threads are split across multiple posts when archiving, the range of messages in each part will be displayed alongside the thread title. For example: `(message 1 to 16 of 20)` and `(message 17 to 20 of 20)`.
This bug was very reproducible when your last read was a message you didn't read and an admin would delete it. When coming back to the channel you would get a not found, in this case we will now reset last read and present you the last message of the channel.
We could be more fancy and try to detect the next readable message but that would be more code and complexity for such a rare case.
