hcq/MaxScale
hcq/MaxScale
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fixed weightby overflow being silently ignored in readwritesplit

Browse Source 
If individual servers had a weightby parameter value greater than INT_MAX * 1000
the integer used for calculation would overflow and the server would end up
having a negative weight. This would cause all connections to pile up on this
server.

The same overflow was possible for the sum of all the weightby parameter values
even if no single parameter exceeded the limit.
This commit is contained in:
Markus Makela 2015-11-25 22:30:51 +02:00
parent b0458b3cc4
commit 8ae187622c
1 changed files with 73 additions and 52 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

125
server/modules/routing/readwritesplit/readwritesplit.c
View File

@ -620,60 +620,81 @@ createInstance(SERVICE *service, char **options)
*/
router->available_slaves = true;
/*
* If server weighting has been defined calculate the percentage
* of load that will be sent to each server. This is only used for
* calculating the least connections, either globally or within a
* service, or the number of current operations on a server.
*/
if ((weightby = serviceGetWeightingParameter(service)) != NULL)
{
int n, total = 0;
BACKEND *backend;
/*
* If server weighting has been defined calculate the percentage
* of load that will be sent to each server. This is only used for
* calculating the least connections, either globally or within a
* service, or the number of current operations on a server.
*/
if ((weightby = serviceGetWeightingParameter(service)) != NULL)
{
int total = 0;
for (n = 0; router->servers[n]; n++)
{
backend = router->servers[n];
total += atoi(serverGetParameter(
backend->backend_server, weightby));
}
if (total == 0)
{
MXS_WARNING("Weighting Parameter for service '%s' "
"will be ignored as no servers have values "
"for the parameter '%s'.\n",
service->name, weightby);
}
else
{
for (n = 0; router->servers[n]; n++)
{
int perc;
int wght;
backend = router->servers[n];
wght = atoi(serverGetParameter(backend->backend_server,
weightby));
perc = (wght*1000) / total;
if (perc == 0 && wght != 0)
{
perc = 1;
}
backend->weight = perc;
for (int n = 0; router->servers[n]; n++)
{
BACKEND *backend = router->servers[n];
char *param = serverGetParameter(backend->backend_server, weightby);
if (param)
{
total += atoi(param);
}
}
if (total == 0)
{
MXS_WARNING("Weighting Parameter for service '%s' "
"will be ignored as no servers have values "
"for the parameter '%s'.",
service->name, weightby);
}
else if (total < 0)
{
MXS_ERROR("Sum of weighting parameter '%s' for service '%s' exceeds "
"maximum value of %d. Weighting will be ignored.",
weightby, service->name, INT_MAX);
}
else
{
for (int n = 0; router->servers[n]; n++)
{
BACKEND *backend = router->servers[n];
char *param = serverGetParameter(backend->backend_server, weightby);
if (param)
{
int wght = atoi(param);
int perc = (wght * 1000) / total;
if (perc == 0)
{
if (wght != 0)
{
perc = 1;
}
MXS_ERROR("Weighting parameter '%s' with a value of %d for"
" server '%s' rounds down to zero with total weight"
" of %d for service '%s'. No queries will be "
"routed to this server.", weightby, wght,
backend->backend_server->unique_name, total,
service->name);
}
else if (perc < 0)
{
MXS_ERROR("Weighting parameter '%s' for server '%s' is too large, "
"maximum value is %d. No weighting will be used for this server.",
weightby, backend->backend_server->unique_name, INT_MAX / 1000);
perc = 1000;
}
backend->weight = perc;
}
else
{
MXS_WARNING("Server '%s' has no parameter '%s' used for weighting"
" for service '%s'.", backend->backend_server->unique_name,
weightby, service->name);
}
}
}
}
if (perc == 0)
{
MXS_ERROR("Server '%s' has no value "
"for weighting parameter '%s', "
"no queries will be routed to "
"this server.\n",
router->servers[n]->backend_server->unique_name,
weightby);
}
}
}
}
/**
* vraa : is this necessary for readwritesplit ?
* Option : where can a read go?