that's selecting into a RECORD variable returns zero rows, make it
assign an all-nulls row to the RECORD; this is consistent with what
happens when the SELECT INTO target is not a RECORD. In support of
this, tweak the SPI code so that a valid tuple descriptor is returned
even when a SPI select returns no rows.
datetime token tables. Even more embarrassing, the regression tests
revealed some of the problems --- but evidently the bogus output wasn't
questioned. Add code to postmaster startup to directly check the tables
for correct ordering, in hopes of not being embarrassed like this again.
fix uses explicit joins to avoid using the genetic query optimizer for
consistent results.
Modified Files:
Tag: REL7_3_STABLE
jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc1/AbstractJdbc1DatabaseMetaData.java
>
> I'd suggest that the runtime.sgml description explicitly say "values of
> at least a few thousand are recommended for production installations".
Neil Conway
per gripe from Csaba Nagy. There is still potential for platform-specific
behavior for values that are exactly halfway between integers, but at
least we now get the expected answer for all other cases.
believe I didn't notice this before -- once 64k was sent to/from the
server the client would crash. Basicly, in 7.3 the server SSL code set
the initial state to "about to renegotiate" without actually starting
the renegotiation. In addition, the server and client didn't properly
handle the SSL_ERROR_WANT_(READ|WRITE) error. This is fixed in the
second patch.
Nathan Mueller
first, that I missed when checking over 7.3.1, was that the client
method was switched to SSLv23 along with the server. The SSLv23 client
method does SSLv2 by default, but can also understand SSLv3. In our
situation the SSLv2 backwords compatibility is really only needed on the
server. This is the first patch.
The last thing is that I found a way for the server to understand SSLv2
HELLO messages (sent by pre-7.3 clients) but then get them to talk
SSLv3. This is the last one.
Nathan Mueller
> The big problem is that while pg_dump's dump_trigger() looks at
> tginitdeferred and dumps accordingly, pg_get_constraintdef doesn't look
> at tginitdeferred, and therefore doesn't record the requirement as part
> of ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT.
pg_get_constraintdef should probably be looking at condeferrable and
condeferred in the pg_constraint row it's looking at. Maybe something
like the attached.
(Added, output only non-default values.)
Stephan Szabo
the index AM when we know we are fetching a unique row. However, this
logic did not consider the possibility that it would be asked to fetch
backwards. Also fix mark/restore to work correctly in this scenario.
match parent table. This used to work, but was broken in 7.3 by
rearrangement of code that handles targetlist sorting. Add a regression
test to catch future breakage.
